Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Generalized Model of Voting One Issue at a Time with Applications to Congress

Bibliographic Data

ID6231771
AuthorsJames M Enelow (corresponding author)
Year1984
Volume28
Issue3
Pages587
Publication date1984-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2110906
OpenAlexW2332891297
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited4

Earlier work by Enelow and Hinich that develops a theory of how voter expectations affect preferences on a single issue is extended by building into the model a dependence between futureissue decisions and present alternatives. It is assumed that each voter forecasts future issue decisions with a multidimensional random variable whose mean is linear in the alternatives of the present issue. If voters have quadratic utility (i.e., are risk-averse) and maximize expected utility, it is shown that symmetric, single-peaked preferences are induced on each issue based on the preference and forecast parameters of each voter. Consequently, an equilibrium decision exists on each issue. This equilibrium is a generalization of the one derived by Enelow and Hinich. The author argues that the model developed in the paper is useful for representing and providing insights into the type of single-issue voting that occurs in Congress, and demonstrates through examples both that the problem addressed by the model arises frequently in congressional voting and that the assumption of a linear dependence between present alternatives and mean forecasts on future issues is reasonable in many real world instances of congressional decision making

Econometrics · Economics · Expected utility hypothesis · Generalization · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Preference · Voting · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Mathematics

  • The stability of logrolling

    Open Access•James M Enelow•Public Choice•1986

  • Spatial Models of Legislative Choice

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1988

  • A Change of Mind or a Change of Focus? A Theory of Choice Reversals in Politics

    Bryan D Jones•Journal of Public Administration…•1994

  • Shaping the Congressional Debate on the Gulf War

    David Niven•Congress & the Presidency•1996

  • The Strategic Agenda in Legislative Politics

    Open Access•Calvin Mouw, Calvin J Mouw et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Sequential Voting with Endogenous Voter Forecasts

    Open Access•Dennis Epple, Joseph B Kadane•American Political Science Review•1990

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • Voter Expectations in Multi-Stage Voting Systems

    James M Enelow, Melvin J Hinich•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Structure-Induced Equilibria and Perfect-Foresight Expectations

    Arthur T Denzau, Robert J Mackay•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • Voting One Issue at a Time

    Open Access•James M Enelow, Melvin J Hinich•American Political Science Review•1983

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,15
Citation span1986 - 1996 (11)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae