Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel

Bibliographic Data

ID6231970
AuthorsKenneth N Bickers, Robert M Stein (0000-0001-9586-380X)
Year1996
Volume40
Issue4
Pages1300
Publication date1996-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111752
OpenAlexW1969768715
LanguageEN
Citations received129
References cited19

Theory: This paper articulates a model of distributive policy activity that links decreases in the flow of distributive policy benefits to House districts to an increased likelihood that quality challengers will oppose incumbents in primary and/ or general elections. Hypotheses: Do electorally vulnerable legislators seek to increase the flow of new awards early in the subsequent electoral cycle in order to help overcome their vulnerability? Do heightened levels of new awards reduce the probability that incumbent legislators will face quality challengers in upcoming primary or general elections? Methods: Congressional district-level data on new awards, where the time from application to final award was less than four months, are regressed on electoral margins, open-seat status, and political action committee campaign contributions for the 100th and 101st Congresses. Results: The flow of new awards early in a Congressional term is higher in districts where the incumbent was elected in an open seat race and when the open seat incumbent was elected by a narrow margin. This is especially true of programs in the Small Business Administration that provide loans and loan guarantees to small businesses. While only a minority of incumbents typically face quality challengers, high levels of new awards early in the Congressional term reduce the likelihood that incumbents will face quality challengers in the subsequent primary or general election. Increases in the number of discretionary awards going to recipients other than small businesses tend to be more useful in fending off quality challengers than loans and loan guarantees from the Small Business Administration

Administration (probate law · Business · Business cycle · Demographic economics · Economics · Face (sociological concept · Loan · Macroeconomics · Margin (machine learning · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Quality (philosophy · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Finance · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Distributive Politics

    Open Access•Sanford C Gordon, Woo Chang Kang•Emerging Trends in the Social and…•2015

  • The Particularistic President

    Open Access•Douglas L Kriner, Andrew Reeve et al.•Particularistic President•2015

  • Congress in Black and White

    Open Access•Christian R Grose•Congress in Black and White•2011

  • Issue Politics in Congress

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin•Issue politics in Congress•2005

  • Greasing the Wheels

    Open Access•Diana Evans•Greasing the Wheels•2004

  • Allocative claims and pork barrel politics

    Open Access•Marius Sältzer, Hauke Peters et al.•Party Politics•2026

  • Welfare for the Wealthy

    Open Access•Christopher Faricy, Christopher G Faricy•Welfare for the Wealthy•2012

  • Responsive States

    Open Access•Andrew Karch, Shanna Rose•Responsive States•2019

  • All politics is local

    Open Access•Reza Houston, Stephen P Ferris et al.•Contemporary Economic Policy•2026

  • Shaping Appropriations

    Open Access•Fred Gui, Lawrence S Rothenberg•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Party, Electoral Vulnerability, and Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Jeffrey Lazarus•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Voting's Rewards

    P S Martins, Paul S Martin•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Recentralizing the U.S. House Appropriations Process, 1919–20

    Gregory L Bovitz, Jamie L Carson et al.•Historical Methods A Journal of…•2012

  • Return to Spender

    Open Access•Dave Bridge•The Forum•2015

  • The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Jessica A Schoenherr, Elizabeth A Lane et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • The distributive politics of tax expenditures

    Christopher Faricy•Politics Groups and Identities•2015

  • Congressional modification of benefit-cost analysis as a vehicle for particularized benefits and a limitation on agency discretion

    Open Access•Russell W Mills•Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis•2013

  • Desirable pork

    Open Access•Travis Braidwood•Research & Politics•2015

  • Presidents and the Conditional Core-Swing Targeting of the National Subsidy in South Korea, 1989–2018

    Open Access•Wooseok Kim•Journal of East Asian Studies•2021

  • Using tax dollars for re-election

    Open Access•J Zachary Klingensmith•Constitutional Political Economy•2018

  • Congressional Earmarks and Credit Claiming in a Partisan Era

    Open Access•James M Curry, Sylvester•American Politics Research•2025

  • Electoral Benefits of Pork Barrel Politics in the US

    Open Access•Stephanie Mae Pedron, Lara Wessel•Political Studies Review•2025

  • Votes, money can buy. The conditional effect of EU Structural Funds on government MPs’ electoral performance

    Open Access•Zsófia Papp•European Union Politics•2019

  • Beyond Credit Claiming

    Open Access•Peter T Mclaughlin, Nathan T Barron•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Politics, management, and the allocation of arts funding

    Anthony M Bertelli, Jennifer M Connolly et al.•International Journal of Cultural…•2013

  • US Federal research & development funding

    Jonathan Gordon, Hyung Min Kim et al.•Review of International Political…•2007

  • Is need enough? The determinants of intergovernmental grants to local homeless programs

    David Lee•Journal of Urban Affairs•2019

  • District Size and Proximity to the Pork Barrel in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Brian T Hamel, Linda M Richards et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Explaining How Subnational Politics Shapes Committee Assignment in a Federal Country

    Open Access•Gabriel Levita, Victoria Ortiz De Rozas•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • The Partisanship of House Committees and Member Self‐Selection

    Open Access•James M Ryan•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Do Your Job, Keep Your Seat

    Open Access•Serika Atsumi•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • The responsiveness of state legislatures and their agenda concerning gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender interests

    Open Access•Robert Herrick•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • The Presidential Pork Barrel and the Conditioning Effect of Term

    Open Access•Andrew J Taylor•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • The Contemporary Presidency

    Open Access•Nicholas Stramp, Nicholas R Stramp•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Career motives of presidential appointees and agency communication across American states

    Open Access•Huchen Liu•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Technical Management in an Age of Openness

    Open Access•Sarah E Anderson, Heather Hodges et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2013

  • Contracts, Agency Vulnerability, and the Allocation of Federal Funds

    Open Access•Stuart Kasdin, Luona Lin•The American Review of Public…•2019

  • Electoral systems and geographically targeted oversight

    Open Access•Yen‐chieh Liao, Yen-Chieh Liao et al.•Electoral Studies•2026

  • Geographic Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Aid for incumbents

    Open Access•Jeffrey Clemens, Julia A Payson et al.•Public Choice•2026

  • Electoral misgovernance cycles

    Open Access•Spyros Skouras, Nicos Christodoulakis•Public Choice•2014

  • Granting votes

    Open Access•Josip Glaurdić, Vuk Vuković•Public Choice•2017

  • Elections and the Politics of Pork in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Michael H Crespin, Charles J Finocchiaro•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • Legislative influence on administrative decision making in Pennsylvania's Abandoned and Orphan Well Plugging Program

    Open Access•Insik Bang, In Sik Bang et al.•Public Administration•2021

  • Understanding public blame attributions when private contractors are responsible for civilian casualties

    Open Access•Mark D Ramirez•Policy Sciences•2020

  • Public policy for business and the economy Ideological dissensus, change and consensus

    Open Access•Carl Grafton, Anne Permaloff•Policy Sciences•2001

  • Electoral Cycles in Government Policy Making

    Open Access•Daniel Strobl, Hanna Bäck et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Distributive Politics and Party Participation in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke•American Politics Research•2018

  • Earmarks and Subcommittee Government in the U.S. Congress

    Open Access•Austin C Clemens, Austin Clemens et al.•American Politics Research•2015

  • Voting for development? Ruling coalitions and literacy in India

    Open Access•Rikhil R Bhavnani, Francesca R Jensenius•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Earmarks as a Means and an End

    Michael S Rocca, Stacy B Gordon•The Journal of Politics•2012

  • The 2011 Portuguese Presidential Elections

    Carlos Jalali•South European Society & Politics•2011

  • Should I Stay or Should I Go?” Explaining Political Ambition by Electoral Success in Brazil

    Open Access•C Pereira, Lúcio R Rennó•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2013

  • And keep your enemies closer

    Open Access•Santiago Olivella, Kristin Kanthak et al.•Electoral Studies•2017

  • The optimal allocation of campaign funds in U.S. House elections

    Open Access•Devin Incerti•Electoral Studies•2018

  • Earmarks and Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives

    Jeffrey Lazarus, Jeffrey M Glas et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2012

  • Rivals or Allies? A Multilevel Analysis of Cosponsorship within State Delegations in the U.S. Senate

    Justin H Gro, Justin H Gross et al.•Congress & the Presidency•2018

  • Giving the People What They Want? The Distribution of Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Electoral Institutions, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities

    Open Access•Sedi Hirano, Shigeo Hirano•World Politics•2006

  • Nyc 311

    Open Access•Scott L Minkoff•Urban Affairs Review•2016

  • Exchange Theory, Political Parties, and the Allocation of Federal Distributive Benefits in the House of Representatives

    Damon M Cann, Damon Cann et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • The Congressional Pork Barrel in a Republican Era

    Kenneth N Bickers, Robert M Stein•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Organized Interests and the Politics of Federal Discretionary Grants

    Robert C Lowry, Matthew Potoski•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • Secretaries of Pork? A New Theory of Distributive Public Policy

    Anthony M Bertelli, Christian R Grose•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Pork Barreling Is Not Credit Claiming or Advertising

    David Samuels, David J Samuels•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Representation and Public Policy

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Strategic States

    Open Access•Peter T Mclaughlin, Charles J Finocchiaro et al.•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2024

  • Patterns of Personal Vote Seeking in Mixed Electoral Systems

    Thomas Zittel•Representation•2014

  • Politics versus Risk in Allocations of Federal Security Grants

    Holly T Goerdel•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2013

  • Leaving Money on the Table

    Sean Nicholson‐crotty, Nicholson-Crotty et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2012

  • Gender, Issue Stereotypes, and the Electoral Returns to Distributive Politics in the United States

    Open Access•Brian T Hamel, Nichole M Bauer•Politics & Gender•2024

  • Strategic government communication about performance

    Open Access•Justin De Benedictis-Kessner•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • The Electoral Benefits of Distributive Spending

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus, Shauna Reilly•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • The Distributive Politics of “Compassion in Action

    Open Access•Michael Leo Owens, Amy T Yuen et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2012

  • The Effects of Political Representation on the Electoral Advantages of House Incumbents

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, David C Kimball et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Policy Consequences of Revolving-Door Lobbying

    Open Access•Amy Melissa Mckay, Jeffrey Lazarus•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Women’s Representation in the Highest Court

    Open Access•Melody E Valdini, Christopher Shortell•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • The Partisanship of Bipartisanship

    Open Access•Sean Westwood•Political Behavior•2022

  • Policy Entrepreneurs, Legislators, and Agenda Setting

    Open Access•Sarah E Anderson, Rob A Deleo et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2020

  • Constituency Pressures on Committee Selection

    Christopher D Raymond, Jacob Holt•Parliamentary Affairs•2017

  • Yes, Minister

    Jane Suiter, Eoin O''Malley et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2014

  • Pork‐Barreling without Reelection? Evidence from the Mexican Congress

    Open Access•Yann P Kerevel•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Majority Party Strategy and Suspension of the Rules in the House

    Open Access•Austin Bussing•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Cultivating Votes in Rural Chile

    Open Access•Juan Ricardo Couyoumdjian, Juan Pablo Couyoumdjian et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Government Redistribution in the Shadow of Legislative Elections

    Open Access•Michael C Herron, Brett Theodos et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Priority Projects

    Open Access•Peter T Mclaughlin•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Military Base Closures and the 1996 Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Michael S Rocca•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • All the President's Senators

    Open Access•D P Christenson, Douglas L Kriner et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • District Complexity and the Personal Vote

    Open Access•Amber Wichowsky•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Experimental Evidence of the Benefits and Risks of Credit Claiming and Pork Busting

    Open Access•Nathan T Barron, Peter T Mclaughlin•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Term Limits and Pork

    Open Access•Michael C Herron, Kenneth W Shotts•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2006

  • Decentralizing Pork

    Open Access•Anthony M Bertelli, Pamela J Clouser Mccann•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Ambiguous Statutes and Judicial Deference To Federal Agencies

    Open Access•John Wright, John R Wright•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2010

  • Institutional earmarks

    Open Access•Peter T Mclaughlin•Journal of Public Policy•2023

  • Agency Structure and the Distribution of Federal Spending

    Sarah E Anderson, Matthew Potoski•Journal of Public Administration…•2016

  • Improving Outcomes in Fiscal Federalism

    Jessica N Terman, Jessica Terman et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • The electoral effects of closing military bases

    Colin Emrich•Journal of Legislative Studies•2021

  • Geographically targeted spending

    Open Access•M Tavits•European Political Science Review•2009

  • Privileging One’s Own? Voting Patterns and Politicized Spending in India

    Open Access•Francesca R Jensenius, Pradeep Chhibber•Comparative Political Studies•2023

  • The Presidency, Regionalism, and Distributive Politics in South Korea

    Open Access•Yusaku Horiuchi, Seungjoo Lee•Comparative Political Studies•2008

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin I Page•Political Science Quarterly•1975

  • Congress and the Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Morris S Ogul•Political Science Quarterly•1980

  • The Personal Vote

    Open Access•William H Flanigan•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • Strategic Decisions on Candidacy in U. S. Congressional Districts

    Open Access•William T Bianco•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1984

  • Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections

    Jon R Bond, Cary R Covington et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections

    Jonathan S Krasno, Donald P Green•The Journal of Politics•1988

  • Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat

    Robert S Erikson•Polity•1976

  • Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections

    Morris P Fiorina•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • A Dynamic Analysis of The Role of War Chests in Campaign Strategy

    J M Box-Steffensmeier•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays

    Steven D Levitt, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Policy and Pork

    Diana Evans•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Political Preferences for the Pork Barrel

    Kenneth A Shepsle, Barry R Weingast•American Journal of Political…•1981

  • Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102d House

    Timothy Groseclose, Keith Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • The Effects of Campaign Spending in Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Gary C Jacobson•American Political Science Review•1978

  • The Allocation of Federal Aid Monies

    Open Access•Robert M Stein•American Political Science Review•1981

Unique citing works129
Citations per year4,61
Citation span1998 - 2026 (29)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 129

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae