Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Majority Party Strategy and Suspension of the Rules in the House

Bibliographic Data

ID6301336
AuthorsAustin Bussing (0000-0002-7631-5493, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume46
Issue4
Pages921-959
Publication date2021-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/lsq.12302
OpenAlexW3045900007
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited50

Most bills that pass the House of Representatives do so under suspension of the rules. Despite the procedure’s prevalence, however, we know little about its systematic use. Although the supermajoritarian threshold for passage of bills under suspension typically precludes the majority party from using these bills for partisan policy, I argue that leadership control over the procedure still allows for the pursuit of party goals. Speakers split the suspension agenda between noncontroversial but substantively important legislation and parochial bills that serve credit‐claiming goals of individual members. While the minority party is not entirely shut out of the process, I argue that Speakers have been strategic in appeasing minority party demands for inclusion. Using data on bills considered under suspension from 1973 to 2015, I demonstrate that the distribution of suspension bills systematically favors electorally vulnerable majority party incumbents, and largely excludes their minority party counterparts

Business · Economics · Inclusion (mineral · Law and economics · Legislation · Political science · Sociology · Suspension (topology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law

  • Toward a theory of minority-party influence in the U.S. Congress

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Nathan W Monroe et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2023

  • Partisan Governance and Minority Party Vetoes

    Open Access•Robert L Oldham, Robert Oldham•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2024

  • Majority Party Agenda Setting

    Open Access•Austin Bussing, Sarah A Treul•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Pork barrel politics

    John A Ferejohn•Pork barrel politics•1974

  • Unorthodox Lawmaking

    Barbara Sinclair•Unorthodox Lawmaking: New…•2017

  • New Directions in Congressional Politics

    Jamie L Carson, Michael S Lynch•New Directions in Congressional…•2020

  • Is Bipartisanship Dead?

    Open Access•Laurel Harbridge•Is Bipartisanship Dead?•2015

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Legislating in the Dark

    James M Curry•Legislating in the Dark•2015

  • Legislative Entrepreneurship in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Gregory J Wawro, Gregory Wawro•Legislative Entrepreneurship in…•2000

  • Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman•Legislative Effectiveness in the…•2014

  • Perpetuating the Pork Barrel

    Open Access•Robert M Stein, Kenneth N Bickers•Perpetuating the Pork Barrel•1995

  • Party, Electoral Vulnerability, and Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Jeffrey Lazarus•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Insecure Majorities

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•Insecure Majorities•2016

  • Short-Term Goals and Long-Term Effects

    Open Access•Scott A Hendrickson, Jason M Roberts•Journal of Policy History•2016

  • Geographic Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Geographic Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Frances E Lee, Frances Lee•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Congress, The Electoral Connection

    Michael J Ross, David R Mayhew•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • Measuring variations in party unity voting

    Open Access•Michael H Crespin, David W Rohde et al.•Party Politics•2013

  • The Development of Special Orders and Special Rules in the U.S. House, 1881–1937

    Open Access•Jason M Roberts•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • The Keys to Legislative Success in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•William D Anderson, J M Box-Steffensmeier et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Giving the People What They Want? The Distribution of Earmarks in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Buying Negative Agenda Control in the U.S. House

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Nathan W Monroe•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Congressional Elections and the Pork Barrel

    Robert M Stein, Kenneth N Bickers•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • It’s Nothing Personal

    Gary C Jacobson•The Journal of Politics•2015

  • The Electoral Benefits of Distributive Spending

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus, Shauna Reilly•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Party Loyalty and Legislative Success

    Open Access•Edward B Hasecke, Jason D Mycoff•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Abandoning the Regular Order

    Open Access•Peter C Hanson•Political Research Quarterly•2014

  • Partisan vote buying and suspensions in the Postreform House

    Open Access•Kenneth W Moffett•Party Politics•2016

  • All in a Day's Work

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, J Tobin Grant•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1999

  • Congressional Vote Options

    Open Access•David C King, Richard Zeckhauser et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2003

  • Bill Introduction in the Nineteenth Century

    Open Access•Joseph Cooper, Cheryl D Young•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1989

  • Bypassing Congressional Committees

    Open Access•William Bendix•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Knowledge, Expertise, and Committee Power in the Contemporary Congress

    Open Access•James M Curry•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Suspension of the Rules, the Order of Business, and the Development of Congressional Procedure

    Open Access•Stanley Bach•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Joe Cannon and the Minority Party

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel, Alan E Wiseman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • The Cost of Majority‐Party Bias

    Open Access•Michael S Lynch, Anthony J Madonna et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Legislative Productivity in the 93d–105th Congresses

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, William C Terry•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Congressional Party Leadership

    Open Access•Kathleen Bawn•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1998

  • Partisan agenda control in the US house

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Nathan W Monroe•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2012

  • The Electoral Dynamics of the Federal Pork Barrel

    Kenneth N Bickers, Robert M Stein•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • Partisanship, Blame Avoidance, and the Distribution of Legislative Pork

    Steven J Balla, Eric D Lawrence et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Cardinals or Clerics? Congressional Committees and the Distribution of Pork

    Open Access•Christopher R Berry, Anthony Fowler•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • Political Parties and the Distribution of Federal Outlays

    Steven D Levitt, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Gregory Koger et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Re-Thinking Legislative Productivity

    Lawrence Cloyd Dodd, Scot Schraufnagel•Congress & the Presidency•2009

  • The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting

    Open Access•Robert S Erickson•American Political Science Review•1971

  • The Contributions of Samuel J. Randall to the Rules of the National House of Representatives

    Open Access•Albert V House•American Political Science Review•1935

  • How Words and Money Cultivate a Personal Vote

    Open Access•Justin Grimmer, Messing et al.•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Out of Step, Out of Office

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•2002

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,75
Citation span2022 - 2024 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae