Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a Heterogeneous

Bibliographic Data

ID6232575
AuthorsThomas W Gilligan, Keith Krehbiel
Year1989
Volume33
Issue2
Pages459
Publication date1989-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2111156
OpenAlexW2335175875
LanguageEN
Citations received146

Business · Economics · Law and economics · Legislature · Political science · Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection · Computer Science · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Legal Language and Interpretation

  • Unorthodox Lawmaking and the Value of Committee Assignments

    James M Curry, Leah Rosenstiel•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • The Reach of Political Economy

    Barry R Weingast, Donald Wittman et al.•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • Resolving Controversy in the European Union

    Open Access•Rob Thomson, Robert Thomson•Resolving Controversy in the…•2011

  • Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving

    Open Access•E Scott Adler, John D Wilkerson et al.•Congress and the Politics of…•2013

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Competitive lobbying for a legislator's vote

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•1992

  • Parliamentary committee factors and performance of public accounts committee

    Open Access•Joshua Mugambwa, Mahadih Kyambade et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2024

  • Information disclosure with many alternatives

    Open Access•Salvador Barberà, Antonio Nicolò•Social Choice and Welfare•2021

  • A Theory of Policy Expertise

    Steven Callander•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2008

  • Does Informative Opposition Influence Electoral Accountability

    Satoshi Kasamatsu, Daiki Kishishita•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2024

  • Legislative Organization and Political Representation

    Michael P Olson, Jon C Rogowski•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2024

  • Big 4 Office Political Connections and Client Restatements

    Anastasios Elemes, Jeff Zeyun Chen•European Accounting Review•2022

  • Communication and Binary Decisions

    Open Access•Frédéric Loss, Estelle Malavolti-Grimal et al.•SSRN Electronic Journal•2010

  • Consensus Building

    Bernard Caillaud, Jean Tirole•American Economic Review•2007

  • On Judicial Review in a Separation of Powers System

    Open Access•Tiberiu Dragu, Oliver Board•Political Science Research and…•2015

  • The committee outlier debate

    Open Access•Tim Groseclose•Public Choice•1994

  • Technocratic or democratic interest representation? How different types of information affect lobbying success

    Open Access•Linda Flöthe•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2019

  • Trading control

    Open Access•Mareike Kleine•International Theory•2013

  • Why are some parliamentarians’ bills more likely to progress? Sponsorship as a signal

    Open Access•Andrés Dockendorff•The British Journal of Politics…•2020

  • Trawling for subsidies

    Urs Steiner Brandt, Gert Tinggaard Svendsen•Journal of European Public Policy•2009

  • Out of the Past

    Open Access•Elaine K Swift, D Brady et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•1991

  • The Deinstitutionalization (?) of the House of Representatives

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Charles Stewart•Studies in American Political…•2018

  • Organizing Staff in the U.S. Senate

    Nicholas O Howard, Mark Owens•Congress & the Presidency•2021

  • Expertise, turnover and refreshment within the committees of the European Parliament

    Open Access•David A Alexander•Journal of European Integration•2022

  • Information and political institutions

    Open Access•Alan E Wiseman•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2013

  • Delegation, capture and endogenous information structures

    Open Access•Perrin Lefebvre, David Martimort•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2022

  • The role of oversight committees in closed rule legislation

    Open Access•Wim Van Gestel, Christophe Crombez•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2014

  • An informational rationale for committee gatekeeping power

    Open Access•David Epstein, David Mark Epstein•Public Choice•1997

  • Looking for a smoking gun

    Open Access•Charles R Shipan•Public Choice•1995

  • Exclusive Committee Assignments and Party Pressure in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Kristin Kanthak•Public Choice•2004

  • Human capital, committee power and legislative outcomes

    Open Access•Jason L Saving•Public Choice•1997

  • Arthur Lupia and Mathew D. McCubbins, The democratic dilemma

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith•Public Choice•1999

  • Elections with Privately Informed Parties and Voters

    Open Access•César Martinelli•Public Choice•2001

  • Budgetary Devices for Curbing Spending Prone Ministers and Bureaucrats

    Open Access•Otto H Swank•Public Choice•2002

  • Learning and signalling by advisor selection

    Open Access•Wilko Letterie, Otto H Swank•Public Choice•1997

  • Committee jurisdiction, congressional behavior and policy outcomes

    Open Access•John M De Figueiredo•Public Choice•2013

  • Lobbying when the decisionmaker can acquire independent information

    Open Access•Eric Rasmusen•Public Choice•1993

  • The Politics of the U.S. Federal Judiciary's Requests for Institutional Reform

    Open Access•David A Hughes, Richard L Vining et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • The Chief Justice as Effective Administrative Leader

    Open Access•Richard L Vining, Teena Wilhelm et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Recent Work in Game Theory and Coalition Theory

    Open Access•Stewart Wood, Ian Mclean et al.•Political Studies•1995

  • Issue Specialization and Effective Lawmaking in the U.S. Congress

    Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman•The Journal of Politics•2026

  • Strategic Transmission of Correlated Information

    Open Access•Sergio Currarini, Giovanni Ursino et al.•The Economic Journal•2020

  • A Model of Public Consultation

    Open Access•Kohei Kawamura•The Economic Journal•2011

  • Institutions, information asymmetry and democratic responsiveness

    Open Access•Isa Camyar•Acta Politica•2014

  • Democracy in parliament vs. democracy through parliament? Defining the rules of the game in the European Parliament

    Nathan Brack, Olivier Costa•Journal of Legislative Studies•2018

  • Parliamentary committees in european democracies

    Kaare Strom•Journal of Legislative Studies•1998

  • Achieving Consensus Through Committees

    Open Access•Pierpaolo Settembri, Christine Neuhold•JCMS Journal of Common Market…•2009

  • The policy impact of leadership in committees

    Open Access•R Costello, Rob Thomson•European Union Politics•2010

  • Rapporteurship Allocation in the European Parliament

    Open Access•Michael Kaeding•European Union Politics•2004

  • The Rationale behind Committee Assignment in the European Parliament

    Open Access•Nikoleta Yordanova•European Union Politics•2009

  • Uncertainty and political elites’ behavior

    Open Access•Barbara Vis, Olaf Van Der Veen•European Political Science Review•2026

  • Testing Committee Composition Hypotheses for the U.S. Congress

    Tim Groseclose•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • Policy-Development Monopolies

    Alexander V Hirsch, Kenneth W Shotts•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Retesting Committee Composition Hypotheses for the U.S. Congress

    Open Access•Rodolfo Espino, Michael M Franz•Political Analysis•2004

  • Why Information? Choosing Committee Informativeness in U.S. State Legislatures

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Why conference committees? A theory of conference use in structuring bicameral agreement

    Open Access•Ryan J Vander Wielen•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2012

  • Urgency Petitions and the Informational Problem in the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies

    Open Access•Acir Almeida, Fabiane Vinente Dos Santos•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2009

  • Project selection with biased advice

    Open Access•Miguel Martinez-Carrasco, Eric Schmidbauer et al.•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2025

  • Explaining Reforms of Parliamentary Minority Rights

    Ulrich Sieberer, Wolfgang C Müller•West European Politics•2015

  • Local Logrolling? Assessing the Impact of Legislative Districting in Los Angeles

    Open Access•Charla M Burnett, Craig M Burnett et al.•Urban Affairs Review•2014

  • Procedural Choice and the House Committee on Rules

    Douglas Dion, John D Huber•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Patronage, the Pendleton Act, and the Power of the People

    Sean M Theriault•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Rules of Method and Rules of Conduct

    James W Endersby•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • Delegation and Positive-Sum Bureaucracies

    Alan E Wiseman•The Journal of Politics•2009

  • Intercameral Bargaining and Intracameral Organization in Legislatures

    Sean Gailmard, Thomas H Hammond et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Self-Enforcing Partisan Procedures

    Daniel Diermeier, Carlo Prato et al.•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • Comparing Floor-Dominated and Party-Dominated Explanations of Policy Change in the House of Representatives

    Cary R Covington, Andrew A Bargen et al.•The Journal of Politics•2004

  • The House Discharge Procedure and Majoritarian Politics

    John W Patty•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Cabinets, Committees, and Careers

    Alessio Cirone, Alexandra Cirone et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • A Jamming Theory of Politics

    William Minozzi•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Committee Theories and Committee Votes

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2006

  • State Legislative Committees and Economic Connections

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2012

  • Amicus Coalition Heterogeneity and Signaling Credibility in Supreme Court Agenda Setting

    Greg Goelzhauser, Nicole Vouvalis•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2015

  • Divided government, delegation, and civil service reform

    Open Access•Elliott Ash, Massimo Morelli et al.•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • The Effects of Measurement and Methods Decisions on Committee Preference Outlier Results

    Open Access•Mary Sprague•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • The Position-taking Value of Bill Sponsorship in Congress

    Open Access•Michael S Rocca, Stacy B Gordon•Political Research Quarterly•2010

  • Jurisdiction, Institutional Structure, and Committee Representativeness

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • The Role of Media Distrust in Partisan Voting

    Open Access•Jonathan Mcdonald Ladd•Political Behavior•2010

  • Polarization and Ideology

    Open Access•John H Aldrich, Jacob M Montgomery et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • Performance of an Institutionalized Legislature

    Open Access•Thomas W Gilligan•Political Analysis•1991

  • The “Israel Lobby” and American Politics

    Open Access•Robert C Lieberman•Perspectives on Politics•2009

  • Power behind the Scenes

    Open Access•Philip Norton•Parliamentary Affairs•2019

  • Personal Ambitions, Expertise and Parties’ Control

    Open Access•Daniela Giannetti, Andrea Pedrazzani et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2019

  • A Lab Experiment on Committee Hearings

    Open Access•Ju Yeon Park•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Geographic Representation in Party‐Dominated Legislatures

    Open Access•Thomas Zittel, Dominic Nyhuis et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • How Responsive Are Legislators to Policy Information? Evidence from a Field Experiment in a State Legislature

    Open Access•Adam Zelizer•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Knowledge, Expertise, and Committee Power in the Contemporary Congress

    Open Access•James M Curry•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Uncertainty and the Prevalence of Committee Outliers

    Open Access•Jesse Richman•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Chamber Size Effects on the Collaborative Structure of Legislatures

    Open Access•Justin H Kirkland•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • The Cost of Majority‐Party Bias

    Open Access•Michael S Lynch, Anthony J Madonna et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2016

  • Informative Committees and Legislative Performance in the American States

    Open Access•Nick C N Lin•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2015

  • On the buyability of voting bodies

    Open Access•John Morgan, Felix Várdy•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2011

  • Learning from others

    Open Access•Douglas Glick, David M Glick et al.•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2015

  • Committee Assignments in a Nascent Party System

    Open Access•Sabri Ciftci, Walter Forrest et al.•International Political Science…•2008

  • The Messenger Game

    Open Access•Tao Li•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2007

  • Committee Gatekeeping and Proposal Power under Single and Multiple Referral

    Open Access•Garry Young•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1996

  • Informational loss in bundled bargaining

    Open Access•Ying Chen, Hülya Eraslan•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2013

  • Why does the majority party bother to have minority party members on committees

    Open Access•Hong Min Park•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2012

  • The role of procedural commitment in informational theories of legislative organization

    Open Access•Fang-Yi Chiou, Fang‐yi Chiou•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2011

  • Contemporary Theory of Institutions in Perspective

    Open Access•Itai Sened•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1991

Unique citing works146
Citations per year3,95
Citation span1989 - 2026 (38)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 146

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae