Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Laboratory Experiments in Political Economy

Bibliographic Data

ID6232803
AuthorsThomas R Palfrey (0000-0003-0769-8109, California Institute of Technology, corresponding author)
Year2009
Volume12
Issue1
Pages379-388
Publication date2009-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnnual Review of Political Science (BOOK_SERIES)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1094-2939 • E-ISSN: 1545-1577
PublisherAnnual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.091007.122139
OpenAlexW2139523938
LanguageEN
Citations received28
References cited51

This article summarizes a small part of the literature on laboratory experiments in political economy. The experiments discussed are primarily aimed at testing predictions of equilibrium models of voting in committees and elections. The specific topics discussed are voter turnout, the Condorcet jury theorem, and the swing voter's curse. The latter two topics address questions of information aggregation by voting rules. All the experiments find significant evidence of strategic voting and, with a few exceptions, find support for the equilibrium predictions of the theories

Condorcet method · Curse · Economics · Information aggregation · Jury · Mathematical economics · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public economics · Ranked voting system · Sociology · Turnout · Voting · Voting behavior · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law

  • Efficiency, Legitimacy, and the Administrative State

    Open Access•Samuel Decanio•Social Philosophy and Policy•2021

  • Fostering trust in human-robot interaction via perspective-taking and anthropomorphism

    Open Access•Maximilian Wittmann, Runjie Xie et al.•International Journal of…•2026

  • Other people’s money

    Open Access•Joy Buchanan, Joy A Buchanan et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • Law or strategic calculus? Abstention in the Argentine Supreme Court

    Open Access•Sergio Muro, Alejandro Chehtman•International Review of Law and…•2020

  • Conflicted voters

    Open Access•Sacha Bourgeois-Gironde, João V Ferreira•Journal of Economic Behavior &…•2016

  • Political autonomy and independence

    Open Access•Klaus Abbink, Jordi Brandts•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2016

  • Putting Politics in the Lab

    Open Access•Damien Bol•Government and Opposition•2019

  • Increased Realism at Lower Cost

    Open Access•Delia Dumitrescu, André Blais•PS Political Science & Politics•2011

  • Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies

    Open Access•Rachael Shwom, David Bidwell et al.•Global Environmental Change•2010

  • The Promise of Experiments for Studying the Presidency

    Open Access•Jeffrey E Cohen•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Other-regarding preferences, in-group bias and political participation

    Open Access•Pedro Robalo, Arthur Schram et al.•Journal of Economic Psychology•2017

  • Voting Islamist or voting secular? An empirical analysis of voting outcomes in Egypt’s “Arab Spring”

    Open Access•May Elsayyad, Shimaa Hanafy et al.•Public Choice•2014

  • Voting “Ford” or Against

    Open Access•Carla M N Caruana, R Michael Mcgregor et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2018

  • Vote Trading in Power-Sharing Systems

    Open Access•Nikolas Tsakas, Dimitrios Xefteris et al.•The Economic Journal•2021

  • Please Don't Vote for Me

    Open Access•Jörg L Spenkuch•The Economic Journal•2015

  • The Principles of Experimental Design and Their Application in Sociology

    Michelle Jackson, D R Cox•Annual Review of Sociology•2013

  • Do Politicians Take Risks Like the Rest of Us? An Experimental Test of Prospect Theory Under MPs

    Open Access•Jona Linde, Barbara Vis•Political Psychology•2017

  • Voting correctly in lab elections with monetary incentives

    Open Access•André Blais, Simon Labbé St-Vincent et al.•Party Politics•2016

  • Balancing the ticket while appealing to the base

    Open Access•Thomas P Krumel, Ali Enami•Party Politics•2017

  • Voting systems and strategic manipulation

    Open Access•Anna Bassi, Anna Maria Bassi•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2015

  • The effects of direct voting and deliberation on legitimacy beliefs

    Open Access•Mikael Persson, Peter Esaiasson et al.•European Political Science Review•2013

  • Which decision‐making arrangements generate the strongest legitimacy beliefs? Evidence from a randomised field experiment

    Open Access•Peter Esaiasson, Mikael Gilljam et al.•European Journal of Political…•2012

  • Anxiety and Vote Decision Making in Winner-Take-All Elections

    Open Access•Delia Dumitrescu, André Blais•Canadian Journal of Political…•2014

  • Field Experimental Work on Political Institutions

    Christian R Grose•Annual Review of Political Science•2014

  • Transparency, Replication, and Cumulative Learning

    Thad Dunning•Annual Review of Political Science•2016

  • Political Economy Models of Elections

    Torun Dewan, Kenneth A Shepsle•Annual Review of Political Science•2011

  • Congress, Lawmaking, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, 1971–2000

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton•American Journal of Political…•2012

  • Taking Others into Account

    Open Access•Jan Sauermann, Andrea Kaiser et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • A Decade of Experimental Research on Spatial Models of Elections and Committees

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Peter C Ordeshook•Advances in the Spatial Theory of…•1990

  • Experimental Foundations of Political Science

    Donald Kinder, Thomas R Palfrey•Experimental foundations of…•1993

  • Perfect Equilibrium in a Bargaining Model

    Ariel Rubinstein•Econometrica•1982

  • An Experimental Study of the Centipede Game

    Richard D Mckelvey, Thomas R Palfrey•Econometrica•1992

  • The Probability Weighting Function

    Drazen Prelec•Econometrica•1998

  • Quantal Response Equilibria for Extensive Form Games

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Thomas R Palfrey•Experimental Economics•1998

  • Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Thomas R Palfrey•Games and Economic Behavior•1995

  • Elections with limited information

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Peter C Ordeshook•Journal of Economic Theory•1985

  • A Group Rule—Utilitarian Approach to Voter Turnout

    Stephen Coate, Michael Conlin•American Economic Review•2004

  • General Conditions for Global Intransitivities in Formal Voting Models

    Richard D Mckelvey•Econometrica•1979

  • Mixed Equilibrium in a Downsian Model with a Favored Candidate

    Open Access•Enriqueta Aragones, Thomas R Palfrey•Journal of Economic Theory•2002

  • An experiment on coordination in multi-candidate elections

    Open Access•Robert Forsythe, Roger Myerson et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•1993

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • An experimental study of storable votes

    Open Access•Alessandra Casella, Andrew Gelman et al.•Games and Economic Behavior•2006

  • Self-Interest, Inequality, and Entitlement in Majoritarian Decision-Making

    Daniel Diermeier, Sean Gailmard•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2006

  • Why people vote

    Open Access•Arthur Schram, Joep Sonnemans•Journal of Economic Psychology•1996

  • A strategic calculus of voting

    Open Access•Thomas R Palfrey, Howard L Rosenthal•Public Choice•1983

  • The Downsian model of electoral participation

    Open Access•Stephen Hansen, Thomas R Palfrey et al.•Public Choice•1987

  • Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo

    Open Access•Thomas Romer, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Public Choice•1978

  • Valence Politics and Equilibrium in Spatial Election Models

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•Public Choice•2000

  • Retrospective voting

    Open Access•Kenneth E Collier, Richard D Mckelvey et al.•Public Choice•1987

  • Rational expectations in elections

    Open Access•Richard D Mckelvey, Peter C Ordeshook•Public Choice•1984

  • The rationally uninformed electorate

    Open Access•Kenneth Collier, Kenneth E Collier et al.•Public Choice•1989

  • An Experimental Test of the Core in a Simple N-Person Cooperative Nonsidepayment Game

    Open Access•Janet E Berl, Richard D Mckelvey et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1976

  • Beliefs and Voting Decisions

    Open Access•John Duffy, M Tavits•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Fairness in Majority Rule Games with a Core

    Cheryl L Eavey, Gary J Miller•American Journal of Political…•1984

  • A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage

    Tim Groseclose•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Neighborhood Information Exchange and Voter Participation

    Open Access•Jens Großer, Arthur Schram•American Political Science Review•2006

  • Bureaucratic Agenda Control

    Open Access•Cheryl L Eavey, Gary J Miller•American Political Science Review•1983

  • The Paradox of Voter Participation? A Laboratory Study

    Open Access•David K Levine, Thomas R Palfrey•American Political Science Review•2007

  • Efficiency, Equity, and Timing of Voting Mechanisms

    Open Access•Marco Battaglini, Rebecca B Morton et al.•American Political Science Review•2007

  • An Explanation of Anomalous Behavior in Models of Political Participation

    Open Access•Jacob K Goeree, Charles A Holt•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Stability and Coordination in Duverger's Law

    Open Access•Mark Fey•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Bargaining in Legislatures

    Open Access•David P Baron, John Ferejohn et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • A Theory of Voting Equilibria

    Open Access•Roger B Myerson, Roger Myerson et al.•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith et al.•American Political Science Review•1996

  • An Experimental Study of Jury Decision Rules

    Open Access•Serena Guarnaschelli, Richard D Mckelvey et al.•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Bargaining in Legislatures

    Guillaume R Fréechette, John H Kagel et al.•American Political Science Review•2003

  • Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty

    Open Access•Thomas R Palfrey, Howard Rosenthal et al.•American Political Science Review•1985

  • Minority Representation in Multimember Districts

    Open Access•Elisabeth R Gerber, Rebecca B Morton et al.•American Political Science Review•1998

  • Information Asymmetries and Simultaneous versus Sequential Voting

    Open Access•Rebecca B Morton, Kenneth C Williams•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Convicting the Innocent

    Open Access•Timothy Feddersen, Wolfgang Pesendorfer•American Political Science Review•1998

  • The Effect of Candidate Quality on Electoral Equilibrium

    Open Access•Enriqueta Aragones, Thomas R Palfrey•American Political Science Review•2004

  • The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout

    Open Access•Alan S Gerber, Donald P Green•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Committee Decisions under Majority Rule

    Open Access•Morris P Fiorina, Charles R Plott•American Political Science Review•1978

Unique citing works28
Citations per year1,75
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 28

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae