Citizen and Provincial Power Under Alternative Amending Formulae
An Extension of Kilgour's Analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6239600 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Terrence J Levesque (Wilfrid Laurier University), James W Moore (0000-0001-5273-7168, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) |
| Year | 1984 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 157-166 |
| Publication date | 1984-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Canadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0008423900051313 |
| OpenAlex | W2034855031 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 1 |
In a recent number of this Journal, D. Marc Kilgour describes a formal analysis of the power of provinces and citizens to effect a constitutional amendment, given the requirements specified by paragraph 38(l)(b) of the Constitution Act, 1982. He concludes that the amending formula—essentially the Fulton-Favreau formula proposed in 1964—distributes power more equitably among provinces than it does among citizens when power measures the capacity of provinces and citizens to change the outcome of the amending process by changing their positions on the issue
Constitution · Extension (predicate logic · Law and economics · Paragraph · Political science · Power (physics · Sociology · Computer Science · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Issues in South Africa · Legal principles and applications · Public Administration
Appendix C
Rational Choice? Crisis Bargaining Over the Meech Lake Accord
Voting games and constitutional decision
Banzhaf’s Power Index and Canada’s Constitutional Amending Formula
Empirical Banzhaf indices
The Canadian constitutional amending formula
Bibliographie d’histoire de l’Amérique française (publications récentes)
The Chain Store Paradox and Constitutional Politics in Canada
The Regional Veto Formula and Its Effects on Canada's Constitutional Amendment Process
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,21 |
| Citation span | 1984 - 2008 (25) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |