Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Dissent in Iberia

The ideal points of justices on the Spanish and Portuguese Constitutional Tribunals

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6258232
AutoresChris Hanretty (0000-0002-8932-9405, University of East Anglia, autor correspondente)
Ano2012
Volume51
Fascículo5
Páginas671-692
Data de publicação2012-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoEuropean Journal of Political Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0304-4130 • E-ISSN: 1475-6765
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02056.x
OpenAlexW1539861460
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas41
Referências citadas19

In this article, the non‐unanimous decisions of the Portuguese and Spanish Constitutional Tribunals for the periods 1989–2009 and 2000–2009 are analysed. It is shown that judicial dissent can be predicted moderately well on the basis of judicial ideal points along a single dimension. This dimension is equivalent to the left–right cleavage in both Portugal and Spain. The characteristics of the recovered dimension are demonstrated by analysing both the properties of the cases and the properties of the justices who decided them

Dimension (graph theory · Dissent · Ideal (ethics · Linguistics · Political science · Portuguese · Pure mathematics · European and International Law Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal Language and Interpretation · Mathematics · Philosophy

  • Judicial conflicts on international law

    Open Access•Olof Larsson, Johan Karlsson Schaffer et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2026

  • Ideology and Agenda Setting in the High Court of Australia

    Open Access•Patrick Leslie, Tonja Jacobi et al.•Journal of Empirical Legal Studies•2026

  • Disagreeing in private or dissenting in public

    Open Access•Nuno Garoupa, Laura Salamero-Teixidó et al.•European Journal of Law and…•2022

  • Punishing terrorists in the Spanish Supreme Court

    Open Access•Nuno Garoupa, Fernando Gómez Pomar et al.•European Journal of Law and…•2023

  • No War of Courts in the protection of fundamental rights

    Open Access•Julio López-Laborda, Julio López Laborda et al.•International Review of Law and…•2024

  • Loyalty to the party or loyalty to the party leader

    Open Access•Nuno Garoupa, Marian Gili et al.•International Review of Law and…•2021

  • Hybrid Constitutionalism

    Open Access•Eric C Ip•Hybrid Constitutionalism•2019

  • Mapeando o Supremo

    Open Access•J M Silva•Novos Estudos - CEBRAP•2018

  • How Docket Control Shapes Judicial Behavior

    Open Access•Jon Kåre Skiple, Henrik L Bentsen et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Court Leadership, Agenda Transformation, and Judicial Dissent

    Open Access•Henrik L Bentsen•Journal of Law and Courts•2018

  • Scaling Court Decisions with Citation Networks

    Open Access•Christian Arnold, Benjamin G Engst et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • Judicial Behavior under Austerity

    Open Access•Susana Coroado, Nuno Garoupa et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2017

  • Law and Politics in the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

    Open Access•Øyvind Stiansen, Daniel Naurin et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • The Czech Constitutional Court Database

    Open Access•Štěpán Paulík•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • A game of tug-of-war

    Open Access•Luz Muñoz, Andreu Rodilla•Territory Politics Governance•2024

  • Constitutional courts and citizens’ perceptions of judicial systems in Europe

    Open Access•Rosa M Navarrete, Pablo José Castillo Ortiz et al.•Comparative European Politics•2019

  • Lifting the veil of secrecy – dissenting opinions in the subnational constitutional courts of Germany

    Open Access•Stefan Thierse•Regional & Federal Studies•2022

  • Judicial Disagreement need not be Political

    Chris Hanretty•Europe Asia Studies•2015

  • Gender Bias in Asylum Adjudications

    Open Access•Alejandro Ecker, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik et al.•Sex Roles•2019

  • The Government Deference Dimension of Judicial Decision Making

    Open Access•Jon Kåre Skiple, Henrik Littleré Bentsen et al.•Scandinavian Political Studies•2020

  • How to Place Non-Majoritarian Institutions and Political Actors in a Common Policy Space

    Benjamin G Engst, David M Grundmanns et al.•The Journal of Politics•2024

  • Decision Making on the World Court

    Open Access•Arthur Dyevre•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2025

  • Breaking the Principle of Secrecy

    Open Access•Benjamin Bricker•Law & Policy•2017

  • Judicial ideology in economic cases

    Open Access•Wessel Wijtvliet, Arthur Dyevre•European Union Politics•2021

  • Beyond the Myth of Legality? Framing Effects and Public Reactions to High Court Decisions in Europe

    Open Access•Pedro C Magalhães, Jon Kåre Skiple et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2023

  • Judicial self-perceptions and the separation of powers in varied political regime contexts

    Max Steuer•European Politics and Society•2023

  • EU judicial behaviour research

    Arthur Dyevre•European Politics and Society•2023

  • From a potentially powerful to a polarised court

    Open Access•Monika Glavina•European Politics and Society•2023

  • Strategic Delay and the Use of Incompatibility Rulings at the German Constitutional Court

    Jay N Krehbiel•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Not just about the ruling

    Andreu Rodilla•South European Society & Politics•2025

  • Supreme Court Justices’ Economic Behaviour

    Open Access•Jon Kåre Skiple, Gunnar Grendstad et al.•Scandinavian Political Studies•2016

  • Ideología y comportamiento judicial en jueces de carrera

    Open Access•Andrés Pavón Mediano, Diego Carrasco et al.•Revista de ciencia política•2023

  • The role of the Italian Constitutional Court in the policy agenda

    Open Access•Elisa Rebessi, Francesco Zucchini•Italian Political Science…•2018

  • The political determinants of judicial dissent

    Open Access•Lydia Brashear Tiede•European Political Science Review•2016

  • Constitutional courts as veto players

    Open Access•Sylvain Brouard, Christoph Hönnige•European Journal of Political…•2017

  • The legitimacy‐conferring capacity of constitutional courts

    Open Access•Sebastian Sternberg, Sylvain Brouard et al.•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • The Dilemma of Dissent

    Open Access•Daniel Naurin, Øyvind Stiansen•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • The Politics of Judicial Procedures

    Open Access•Jay N Krehbiel•American Journal of Political…•2016

  • The Evolution of Constitutional Adjudication in the Chinese Special Administrative Regions

    Eric Ip, Eric C Ip•The American Journal of…•2013

  • Estimating Judicial Ideology

    Open Access•Adam Bonica, Malcolm Sen et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2021

  • Measuring Judicial Ideal Points in New Democracies

    Open Access•Lucia Dalla Pellegrina, Laarni Escresa et al.•Asian Journal of Law and Society•2014

  • The Determinants of Judiciary Independence

    Nadia Fiorino, Fabio Padovano et al.•Journal of Institutional and…•2007

  • Party Policy in Modern Democracies

    Kenneth Benoit, Michael Laver•Party Policy in Modern Democracies•2006

  • The Birth of Judicial Politics in France

    Alec Stone Sweet, Alec Stone•The birth of judicial politics in…•1992

  • The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology

    Donald Collier, J M Box-Steffensmeier et al.•The Oxford handbook of political…•2008

  • General Theory of Law and State

    Milton R Konvitz, Hans Kelsen et al.•The Philosophical Review•1947

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • Do ECJ judges all speak with the same voice? Evidence of divergent preferences from the judgments of chambers

    Michael Malecki•Journal of European Public Policy•2011

  • Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Albert D Cover•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Practical Issues in Implementing and Understanding Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation

    Open Access•Joseph Bafumi, Andrew Gelman et al.•Political Analysis•2005

  • Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation

    Open Access•Simon Jackman•Political Analysis•2001

  • Judicialization and the Construction of Governance

    Open Access•Alec Stone Sweet•Comparative Political Studies•1999

  • Bayesian Analysis for Political Research

    Simon Jackman•Annual Review of Political Science•2004

  • Six Notions of ‘Political’ and the United States Supreme Court

    Open Access•Richard Hodder-Williams, Richard Hodder‐william et al.•British Journal of Political…•1992

  • The Study of Judicial Decision-Making as an Aspect of Political Behavior

    Open Access•Glendon A Schubert, Glendon Schubert•American Political Science Review•1958

Obras citantes distintas41
Citações por ano3,15
Intervalo de citações2013 - 2026 (14)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 40
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae