Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consensus by Default? Interaction of Government and Opposition Parties in the Committees of the German Bundestag

Bibliographic Data

ID6263258
AuthorsBernhard Miller (0000-0002-4385-7245), Christian Stecker (0000-0001-9577-7151)
Year2008
Volume17
Issue3
Pages305-322
Publication date2008-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueGerman Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-4008 • E-ISSN: 1743-8993
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09644000802300551
OpenAlexW2041504534
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited13

Consensus implies accommodating opposition. In the parliamentary process evidence on the interaction of opposition and governing parties is sketchy and theoretical approaches are manifold and ambivalent. Most prominently, there are contradicting hypotheses about the role of parliamentary committees in this interaction. While some authors consider committees as arenas for opposition influence and consensus others regard them as an apex of majoritarian dominance only. We argue that behavioural patterns in committees do not follow a static majoritarian or consensual pattern but a dynamic one which varies with context. This article elaborates this argument with regard to the committees of the German Bundestag. Based on novel data we show that different majority constellations in the Bundesrat induce different behavioural patterns in Bundestag committees. Under an opposition-controlled Bundesrat and consent bills decision-making in committees follows a more consensual approach

Ambivalence · Dominance (genetics · Economics · German · Law and economics · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Psychology · Public Administration and Political Analysis · Social Psychology

  • Conflict or cooperation? How opposition party behaviour affects voters’ party evaluations

    Open Access•Robert Welz, Sascha Huber et al.•Political Research Exchange•2025

  • Preparatory Bodies as Mediators of Political Conflict in Trilogues

    Open Access•Ariadna Ripoll Servent, Lara Panning•Politics and Governance•2019

  • Agenda Control by Committee Chairs in Fragmented Multi-party Parliaments

    Maoz Rosenthal•Israeli Studies Review•2018

  • Unity and divisions on departmental select committees

    Open Access•Philip Lynch, Richard Whitaker•The British Journal of Politics…•2020

  • Free trade agreements and regional alliances

    Open Access•Asbel Bohigues, José Manuel Rivas•Revista Brasileira de Política…•2019

  • Achieving cross‐sectoral policy integration in multilevel structures—Loosely coupled coordination of “energy transition” in the German “Bundesrat

    Open Access•Nathalie Behnke, Yvonne Hegele•Review of Policy Research•2023

  • The information ecology of parliamentary monitoring websites

    Arthur Edwards, Dennis De Kool et al.•Information Polity•2015

  • MPs’ principals and the substantive representation of disadvantaged immigrant groups

    Lucas Geese, Carsten Schwemmer•West European Politics•2019

  • Parties on the Chain of Federalism

    Christian Stecker•West European Politics•2015

  • Veto power fosters cooperative behaviour

    Lukas Hohendorf, Thomas Saalfeld et al.•West European Politics•2021

  • Representation of Partisan, Territorial, and Institutional Interests in Second Chambers

    Open Access•Patrick Finke, Markus M Müller et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2020

  • Institutional Change and Legislative Vote Consensus in New Zealand

    Open Access•Brian D Williams, Brian Williams•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Every Single Word

    Open Access•Tobias Remschel, Corinna Kroeber•Government and Opposition•2022

  • Immigration-related Speechmaking in a Party-constrained Parliament

    Lucas Geese•German Politics•2020

  • The Organization of Democratic Legislatures

    Gary W Cox•The Oxford handbook of political…•2009

  • Information and Legislative Organization

    Keith Krehbiel•Information and Legislative…•1991

  • The Theory of Democracy Revisited

    Giovanni Sartori•Democracy•2016

  • Die Umsetzung von EU-Richtlinien im Zeichen der Parteipolitik

    Open Access•Oliver Treib•Politische Vierteljahresschrift.…•2003

  • Peter Schindler, Datenhandbuch zur Geschichte des Deutschen Bundestages 1949 bis 1999

    Adolf Laufs•Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung…•2001

  • Coalition Policymaking and Legislative Review

    Open Access•Leonard W Martins, Georg Vanberg•American Political Science Review•2005

  • Polarization and Publicity

    David Stasavage•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Legislative Self‐Restraint Under Divided Government In Germany, 1976–2002

    Open Access•Philip Manow, Simone Burkhart•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2007

  • Social choice and comparing legislatures

    Anthony J Mcgann•Journal of Legislative Studies•2006

  • The Role of Parliamentary Committees in Coalition Governments

    Open Access•Dong-Hun Kim, Gerhard Loewenberg•Comparative Political Studies•2005

  • Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag

    Thomas Stratmann, Martin Baur•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • The Government Agenda in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•Leonard W Martins, Lanny W Martins•American Journal of Political…•2004

Unique citing works14
Citations per year1
Citation span2012 - 2025 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae