Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Legislative Self‐Restraint Under Divided Government In Germany, 1976–2002

Bibliographic Data

ID6301092
AuthorsPhilip Manow (0000-0002-7154-7789, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies), Simone Burkhart (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies)
Year2007
Volume32
Issue2
Pages167-191
Publication date2007-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegislative Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0362-9805 • E-ISSN: 1939-9162
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3162/036298007780907941
OpenAlexW2079602087
LanguageEN
Citations received31
References cited27

Using the Vanberg (1998) model of legislative autolimitation from the judicial review literature, we investigated the impact of divided government on the strategic choices of government and opposition. The main prediction of the model is that a strong opposition dominance in the second chamber (Bundesrat) usually does not lead to open party‐political conflict, but rather to a government's legislative self‐restraint. We tested the hypotheses following from the model on a detailed dataset comprising all legislative bills in Germany between 1976 and 2002. The results show that the main effects of divided government are, in fact, indirect and anticipatory. We conclude that when majorities in the Bundestag and Bundesrat diverge, the impact on legislation is substantial

Divided government · Dominance (genetics · Economics · Government (linguistics · Legislation · Legislature · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • The Institutions of Programmatic Action

    Open Access•Johanna Hornung•The Institutions of Programmatic…•2022

  • Second order“-Effekte und Determinanten der individuellen Wahlentscheidung bei Landtagswahlen

    Open Access•Jochen Müller, Marc Debus•Zeitschrift für Vergleichende…•2012

  • Party governments, clientelistic reforms, and varying levels of political constraints

    Open Access•Evelyne Hübscher•Comparative European Politics•2016

  • The effects of federalism reform on the legislative process in Germany

    Christian Stecker•Regional & Federal Studies•2016

  • Navigating complexity

    Martin Gro, Jochen Müller et al.•Regional & Federal Studies•2023

  • Strategic postponement of coalition policymaking in European Parliamentary democracies

    Open Access•Xiao Lu•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • Same old, same old? The return of the (not so) Grand Coalition after the 2025 German Bundestag election

    Thorsten Faas, Tristan Klingelhöfer•West European Politics•2026

  • Do elections set the pace? A quantitative assessment of the timing of European legislation

    Laszlo Kovats•Journal of European Public Policy•2009

  • The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament

    Open Access•Meg Russell, Patrick Cowley•Governance•2015

  • Shared Rule vs Self-Rule? Bicameralism, Power-Sharing and the ‘Joint Decision Trap

    Open Access•Arthur Benz, Benz Arthur•Perspectives on Federalism•2018

  • Consensus by Default? Interaction of Government and Opposition Parties in the Committees of the German Bundestag

    Bernhard Miller, Christian Stecker•German Politics•2008

  • Legislative Politics in Germany

    Christian Breunig•German Politics•2008

  • Parties on the Chain of Federalism

    Christian Stecker•West European Politics•2015

  • Veto power fosters cooperative behaviour

    Lukas Hohendorf, Thomas Saalfeld et al.•West European Politics•2021

  • Not just about the ruling

    Andreu Rodilla•South European Society & Politics•2025

  • Reforming Federalism in Germany

    Burkhart, Sarah Burkhart•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2008

  • When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science

    Open Access•Andréa Bäuchtiger, Dominik Hangartner•Political Studies•2010

  • Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity

    Open Access•Thomas Bräuninger, Marc Debus et al.•Political Science Research and…•2017

  • Judicialization of Politics by Elected Politicians

    Open Access•Aylin Aydin-Cakir, Aylin Aydın-Çakır•Political Research Quarterly•2014

  • Government Agenda-Setting and Bicameral Conflict Resolution

    Open Access•David Fortunato, Thomas König et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2013

  • Bicameralism, intra-party bargaining, and the formation of party policy positions

    Open Access•Hanna Bäck, Marc Debus et al.•Party Politics•2016

  • Bicameral Lawmaking

    Open Access•Eduardo Alemán, Nicolás Mimica et al.•Parliamentary Affairs•2022

  • The Unequal Distribution of Speaking Time in Parliamentary‐Party Groups

    Open Access•Hanna Bäck, Markus Baumanns et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2019

  • Temporal Strategies

    Open Access•Christoph Garwe, Benjamin G Engst et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2022

  • Every Single Word

    Open Access•Tobias Remschel, Corinna Kroeber•Government and Opposition•2022

  • Strategic Timing? Coalition Governments and the Introduction of Controversial Legislation Throughout the Electoral Cycle

    Open Access•Christian Bohlen•German Politics•2025

  • Legislating or rubber‐stamping? Assessing parliament's influence on law‐making with text reuse

    Open Access•Roy Gava, Julien M Jaquet et al.•European Journal of Political…•2021

  • Government dominance and the role of opposition in parliamentary democracies

    Open Access•Thomas König, Nick C N Lin et al.•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • The electoral connection in staggered parliaments

    Open Access•David M Willumsen, Christian Stecker et al.•European Journal of Political…•2018

  • Constitutional courts as veto players

    Open Access•Sylvain Brouard, Christoph Hönnige•European Journal of Political…•2017

  • Institutional Factors and Agreement in Lawmaking

    Open Access•Ángel Benítez, Beatriz Carrasco et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat

    Open Access•Gerhard Lehmbruch•Parteienwettbewerb im Bundesstaat•2000

  • Föderalismus als dynamisches System

    Open Access•Arthur Benz, Joachim Jens Hesse•Föderalismus Als Dynamisches System•1985

  • Bicameralism

    Open Access•George Tsebelis, John Money et al.•Bicameralism•1997

  • Divided we govern

    David R Mayhew•Divided we govern•1991

  • Veto Players

    George Tsebelis•Veto Players•2002

  • Democracy and the Market

    Open Access•Adam Przeworski•Democracy and the Market•1991

  • The Birth of Judicial Politics in France

    Alec Stone Sweet, Alec Stone•The birth of judicial politics in…•1992

  • The presidency and the political system

    Open Access•Thomas A Karel•Government Information Quarterly•1984

  • Abstract Judicial Review, Legislative Bargaining, and Policy Compromise

    Open Access•Georg Vanberg•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1998

  • The Formation of the National Party Systems

    Open Access•Joseph Lapalombara•Political Science Quarterly•2005

  • The Joint‐decision Trap

    Open Access•Fritz W Scharpf•Public Administration•1988

  • Divided We Govern? A Reassessment

    Sean Q Kelly•Polity•1993

  • Divided Government and the Passage of Partisan Legislation, 1947-1990

    Gregory R Thorson•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-94

    Open Access•William Howells, William G Howell et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Institutional and Partisan Sources of Gridlock

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•Journal of Theoretical Politics•1996

  • The Politics of Blame

    Tim Groseclose, Nolan Mccarty•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • The Legislative Impact of Divided Government

    George C Edwards, George C Edwards Iii et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Needed

    Open Access•James L Sundquist•Political Science Quarterly•1988

  • Barometer elections in comparative perspective

    Open Access•Christopher J Anderson, D S Ward•Electoral Studies•1996

  • The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies

    Open Access•John D Huber•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Unified Government, Divided Government, and Party Responsiveness

    Open Access•John J Coleman•American Political Science Review•1999

Unique citing works31
Citations per year1,72
Citation span2008 - 2026 (19)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 31

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae