Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Algorithms and Influence Artificial Intelligence and Crisis Decision-Making

Bibliographic Data

ID6274541
AuthorsMichael C Horowitz (0000-0002-3067-7157, University of Pennsylvania), Erik Lin-Greenberg (0000-0003-3627-9181, Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Year2022
Volume66
Issue4
Publication date2022-10-07
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/isq/sqac069
OpenAlexW4312848247
LanguageEN
Citations received20
References cited39

Countries around the world are increasingly investing in artificial intelligence (AI) to automate military tasks that traditionally required human involvement. Despite growing interest in AI-enabled systems, relatively little research explores whether and how AI affects military decision-making. Yet, national security practitioners may perceive the judgments of and actions taken by algorithms differently than those of humans. This variation may subsequently affect decisions on the use of force. Using two original survey experiments fielded on a sample of US national security experts, we find that AI use by both friendly and rival forces affects decision-making during interstate crises. National security experts are less likely to take military action when AI is used to analyze intelligence than when humans conduct the analysis. Experts also viewed an accident involving a rival's AI-enabled weapon that kills American troops as more deserving of retaliation than an accident involving only human operators, suggesting that national security practitioners are less forgiving of errant AI systems than of similarly erring humans. Our findings suggest emerging technologies such as AI can affect decisionmakers’ perceptions in ways that shape political outcomes. Even in a world of algorithms, human decisions will still have important consequences for international security

Action (physics · Affect (linguistics · Computer security · Human intelligence · National security · Perception · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · Law · Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

  • Systemic Thinking and AI-Driven Innovation in Higher Education

    Open Access•Olga Kapoula, Konstantinos Panitsidis et al.•Education Sciences•2026

  • The paradox of intelligence failures in the age of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Erica D Lonergan•Intelligence & National Security•2026

  • Information and communication technologies in political crisis management

    Open Access•Evgeny Pashentsev, Yury Y Kolotaev•Discover Global Society•2025

  • Black Box Warfare

    Open Access•Ryan Shandler, M L Gro et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2026

  • Synthetic biology/AI convergence (SynBioAI)

    Open Access•Nik Hynek•AI & Society•2026

  • Does AI Affect the Democratic Conduct of War? Analyzing US and Israeli Military AI Deployment

    Open Access•Alessandra Russo•Global Policy•2026

  • Artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Musckaan Chauhan, Isabel M Perera•French Politics•2024

  • War and peace in the age of AI

    Open Access•Valerie Sticher•The British Journal of Politics…•2024

  • Learning to trust Skynet

    Christopher Whyte•Arms Control•2023

  • A “journey to trust” for AI

    Daniel R Mccarthy•Arms Control•2026

  • Emerging technology and the cult of the offensive

    Erica D Lonergan•Arms Control•2024

  • Elevating humanism in high-stakes automation

    Open Access•Jenny L Davis•Australian Journal Of International…•2024

  • AI and the decision to go to war

    Open Access•Toni Erskine, Steven E Miller•Australian Journal Of International…•2024

  • Algorithmic war and the dangers of in-visibility, anonymity, and fragmentation

    Open Access•Bianca Baggiarini•Australian Journal Of International…•2024

  • Bolts from the blue

    Christopher Whyte•International Interactions•2026

  • Artificial Intelligence and U.S. Military Cadets’ Attitudes About Future War

    Open Access•Paul Lushenko, Robert Sparrow•Armed Forces & Society•2024

  • Mind over Metal

    Open Access•Ondrej Rosendorf, Michal Smetana et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Trends in Political Science Research

    Open Access•Wilson Wong•International Political Science…•2025

  • Bending the Automation Bias Curve

    Open Access•Michael C Horowitz, Lauren Kahn•International Studies Quarterly•2024

  • AI as Governance

    Open Access•Henry Farrell•Annual Review of Political Science•2025

  • The Dilemmas of Wonderland

    Yakov Ben-Haim•The Dilemmas of Wonderland•2018

  • The Causes of War

    Open Access•Geoffrey Blainey•The Causes of War•1988

  • Does automation bias decision-making?

    Open Access•Linda J Skitka, Linda Skitka et al.•International Journal of…•1999

  • Emotion and Decision Making

    Jennifer S Lerner, Ye Li et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2015

  • Escalation firebreaks in the cyber, conventional, and nuclear domains

    Open Access•Sarah E Krep, Sarah Kreps et al.•Journal of Cybersecurity•2019

  • War

    Richard Smoke•War•1977

  • When are artificial intelligence versus human agents faulted for wrongdoing? Moral attributions after individual and joint decisions

    Daniel B Shank, Alyssa DeSanti et al.•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Us and Them

    Open Access•Mina Cikara, Emile G Bruneau et al.•Current Directions in Psychological…•2011

  • Effects of Fear and Anger on Perceived Risks of Terrorism

    Open Access•Jennifer S Lerner, Roxana M Gonzalez et al.•Psychological Science•2003

  • Inferring Intentions from Consequences

    Open Access•Jonathan A Chu, Marcus Holmes et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2020

  • Who’s prone to drone? A global time-series analysis of armed uninhabited aerial vehicle proliferation

    Open Access•Michael C Horowitz, Joshua A Schwartz et al.•Conflict Management and Peace…•2020

  • Would China Go Nuclear? Assessing the Risk of Chinese Nuclear Escalation in a Conventional War with the United States

    Caitlin Talmadge•International Security•2017

  • Prediction and Judgment

    Alvin Goldfarb, Avi Goldfarb et al.•International Security•2022

  • Delegating strategic decision-making to machines

    James Johnson•Journal of Strategic Studies•2022

  • Cooperation under the Security Dilemma

    Open Access•Robert Jervis•World Politics•1978

  • Analysis, War, and Decision

    Open Access•Richard K Betts•World Politics•1978

  • Does Public Opinion Affect the Preferences of Foreign Policy Leaders? Experimental Evidence from the UK Parliament

    Jonathan A Chu, Stefano Recchia•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • Are Costly Signals More Credible? Evidence of Sender-Receiver Gaps

    Kai Quek•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • The Empathic Foundations of Security Dilemma De‐escalation

    Open Access•Joshua Baker•Political Psychology•2019

  • Presidential Risk Orientation and Force Employment Decisions

    Open Access•Julia Macdonald, Jacquelyn G Schneider et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2017

  • An Eye for an Eye

    Peter Liberman•International Organization•2006

  • Rationalist explanations for war

    Open Access•James D Fearon•International Organization•1995

  • Do Emerging Military Technologies Matter for International Politics

    Open Access•Michael C Horowitz•Annual Review of Political Science•2020

  • Experiments in International Relations

    Susan Hyde, Susan D Hyde•Annual Review of Political Science•2015

  • Experiments and Surveys on Political Elites

    Open Access•Joshua D Kertzer, Jonathan Renshon•Annual Review of Political Science•2022

  • External Validity

    Open Access•Michael G Findley, Kyosuke Kikuta et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2021

  • Re‐Assessing Elite‐Public Gaps in Political Behavior

    Open Access•Joshua D Kertzer•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Revenge in International Politics

    Oded Löwenheim, Gadi Heimann•Security Studies•2008

  • How to make elite experiments work in International Relations

    Open Access•Simone Dietrich, Heidi Hardt et al.•European Journal of International…•2021

  • Drivers are blamed more than their automated cars when both make mistakes

    Open Access•Emmanuelle Awad, Edmond Awad et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2019

Unique citing works20
Citations per year6,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae