Can We Generalize from Student Experiments to the Real World in Political Science, Military Affairs, and International Relations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6283483 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alex Mintz (Department of Political Science, Texas A&M University, Interdisciplinary Center-Herzliya, Israel), Steven B Redd (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee), Arnold Vedlitz (0000-0002-2070-2697, Texas A&M University) |
| Year | 2006 |
| Volume | 50 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 757-776 |
| Publication date | 2006-10-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022002706291052 |
| OpenAlex | W2130351304 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 90 |
| References cited | 32 |
The authors conducted an experiment with a group of military officers and replicated it with a group of students at a public university in the United States. The experimental scenario dealt with a decision problem in the area of counterterrorism. The authors found that while more than one-third of students recommended doing nothing, the overwhelming majority of military officers (more than 90 percent) recommended doing something. Also, military officers exhibited less maximizing and more satisfacing decision making than students. The results show that relying on experiments with students “playing” the role of real-world national security policy makers may bias the results. The two groups are, in fact, very different. Based on student samples, it is possible to accept propositions that would not be found with samples of elite decision makers and reject propositions that may be right. However, it is possible that students can be assigned to experiments where they represent the “public” and not elites
Elite · Epistemology · Foreign policy · International relations · Mathematics education · National security · Nothing · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Corruption and Economic Development · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research · Social Psychology
Are public managers more risk averse? Framing effects and status quo bias across the sectors
Examining the Distinct Effects of Emotive Triggers on Public Reactions to International Terrorism
Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science
Students as Experimental Participants
Why the unskilled are unaware
Cognitive Approaches to Foreign Policy Analysis
Who matters for memory
Conceiving of Future War
Seeing what you want
Who can serve as the proxy for public employees in public administration experiments? a cross-sample comparison
How Long Do News Framing Effects Last? A Systematic review of Longitudinal Studies
Advisors to Elites
Serious subjects
Learning about principles or prospects for success? An experimental analysis of information support for nonviolent resistance
Multilateralism and the Use of Force
Leadership Preferences in Ethno-Territorial Disputes
Public Support for Economic Sanctions
Play It Again, Sam! Teaching Transferable Skills Through Multiple Repetitions of ‘Simple’ Simulations (With Research Benefits)
Breaking the fourth wall in political studies
The State of Experimental Research in IR
Negotiation Inaction Inertia
Tracing Foreign Policy Decisions
Security through numbers? Experimentally assessing the impact of numerical arguments in security communication
Yes, But Did They Learn Anything? An Experimental Investigation of Voter Decision Making on Foreign Policy Issues
Colleague Crowdsourcing
Agenda Setting from the Oval Office
The Relevance of Emotions in Presidential Public Appeals
Where Does the Buck Stop? Applying Attribution Theory to Examine Public Appraisals of the President
Flip-Flops and High Heels
An Experimental Test of Selectorate Theory
Bolts from the blue
Coup-Proofing and Military Inefficiencies
Signaling Resolve
Never out of Now
The Rubicon Theory of War
Cheap fights, credible threats
How Public Managers Make Tradeoffs Regarding Lives
A Protocol for Identifying and Sampling From Proxy Populations
Public Opinion and Leaders’ Crisis Behavior Against Domestic Armed Groups
Examining the effects of political information and intervention stages on public support for military interventions
Between dominance and inequality
What Makes Foreign Policy Teams Tick
What makes political authorities legitimate? Students’ ideas about legitimacy in five European democracies and hybrid regimes
Change over Tenure
Sound the alarm! Updating beliefs and degradative cyber operations
Here’s What to Know About Clickbait
Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape
Democratic Reputations in Crises and War
How Activists Perceive the Utility of International Law
Exploring the Promise of Experimentation in Political Science
Coalition Formation and Selectorate Theory
Deployed to the Hill
Pretty Prudent” or Rhetorically Responsive
Priming and the Obama Effect on Public Evaluations of the United States
The Effect of Social Networks on the Quality of Political Thinking
Citizens, Representatives, and the Myth of the Decision-Making Divide
Beyond the “Narrow Data Base
Electoral Confidence, Overconfidence, and Risky Behavior
Listening to the Government
The External Validity of College Student Subject Pools in Experimental Research
Mayoral Decision-Making
Norms, Diplomatic Alternatives, and the Social Psychology of War Support
Signaling under the Security Dilemma
Democracy and War Effort
The Effect of Sociopsychological Barriers on the Processing of New Information about Peace Opportunities
Wargame of Drones
The Democratic Peace and the Wisdom of Crowds
On Behalf of a Grateful Nation
Audience Costs and the Credibility of Public versus Private Threats in International Crises
International Relations and the Psychology of Time Horizons1
The Dark Side of the Future
Experimental Approaches to International Relations
Folk Realism
No False Promises
Public Opinion and Decisions About Military Force in Democracies
Hawkish Biases and Group Decision Making
Losing Face and Sinking Costs
Decision Maker Preferences for International Legal Cooperation
Reputation and Status as Motives for War
Experiments in International Relations
Experiments and Surveys on Political Elites
Re‐Assessing Elite‐Public Gaps in Political Behavior
The Making of the Informed Voter
An Experimental Test for “Backlash” Against Social Pressure Techniques Used to Mobilize Voters
How to make elite experiments work in International Relations
Wargaming for International Relations research
The Multiple Effects of Casualties on Public Support for War
Nonrepresentative Representatives
Primaries and Candidate Polarization
Convenient yet not a convenience sample
Handbook of Social Psychology
Analogies at War
Experimental Foundations of Political Science
Process tracing methods
Reasons for Framing Effects
Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Origins of Containment
Models of Man
The effects of uncertainty and sex in a crisis simulation game
Conflict in World Politics
A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice
Transforming International Agreements into National Realities
The "Positivity Bias" in Evaluations of Public Figures
The Effects of Stakes and Threat on Foreign Policy Decision‐Making
Age difference in political decision making
Experimental Methodology in Political Science
Domestic Discontent and the External Use of Force
The Influence of Domestic and International Politics on the President's Use of Force
Foreign Policy Decision Making in Familiar and Unfamiliar Settings
The Influence of Advisers on Foreign Policy Decision Making
How Do Leaders Make Decisions
Experimentalmethods Inpoliticalscience
Racial Prejudice and Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action
College sophomores in the laboratory
Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty
The President and the Political Use of Force
The Effect of Dynamic and Static Choice Sets on Political Decision Making
| Unique citing works | 90 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,74 |
| Citation span | 2007 - 2026 (20) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 88 |