Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Cross-Cultural Exploration of the Reference Dependence of Crucial Group Decisions under Risk

Japan's 1941 Decision for War

Bibliographic Data

ID6284156
AuthorsAriel Levi (Wayne State University), Ariel S Levi (Wayne State University), Glen Whyte (University of Toronto)
Year1997
Volume41
Issue6
Pages792-813
Publication date1997-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022002797041006004
OpenAlexW2064429608
LanguageEN
Citations received23
References cited48

This study investigates risky group decision making in Japan from a prospect theory perspective. Hypotheses concerning the effects of the reference point on risk preferences in group decision making were tested by content analyzing transcripts of Japanese leaders' deliberations prior to their 1941 decision for war and subsequent attack on Pearl Harbor. Consistent with prospect theory, the results show systematic associations between the reference point used and the riskiness of policy recommendations. The highly risky decision for war appears to have been influenced by the group's reference point, which framed the group's alternatives as a choice between losses. The decision for war thus appears to have been motivated by a desire to avoid what were otherwise perceived as certain losses

Economics · Geography · Group (periodic table · Group Decision Making · Microeconomics · Pearl · Perspective (graphical · Point (geometry · Political science · Positive economics · Prospect theory · Computer Science · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Mathematics · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Social Psychology

  • Is Military Incompetence Adaptive?

    Open Access•R W Wrangham, Richard Wrangham•Evolution and Human Behavior•1999

  • Is military incompetence adaptive?

    Open Access•Dominic D P Johnson, Dominic Johnson et al.•Evolution and Human Behavior•2002

  • Reframing Legalization, Compliance and Rule by Law as Law as Practice

    Open Access•Stacey M Mitchell•Human Rights Review•2025

  • David versus Goliath

    Jeffrey D Berejikian•Foreign Policy Analysis•2016

  • Determining Support for Humanitarian Interventions

    Open Access•Zlatin Mitkov•Foreign Policy Analysis•2022

  • Prospect theory and foreign policy decision-making

    Open Access•Barbara Vis, Dieuwertje Kuijpers•Arms Control•2018

  • Why language matters

    Jeffrey D Berejikian, Zachary Zwald•Arms Control•2020

  • The use of fear and anger to alter crisis initiation

    Open Access•Lisa J Carlson, Raymond Dacey•Conflict Management and Peace…•2013

  • Sequential Analysis of Deterrence Games with a Declining Status Quo

    Open Access•Lisa J Carlson, Raymond Dacey•Conflict Management and Peace…•2006

  • Risk preferences, uncertainty, and war

    Ahmer Tarar•International Interactions•2021

  • Bad World

    Dominic D P Johnson, Dominic Johnson et al.•International Security•2019

  • Comparing rational choice and prospect theory analyses

    Rose Mcdermott, Jacek Kugler•Journal of Strategic Studies•2001

  • Applications of Prospect Theory to Political Science

    Open Access•Jack S Levy•Synthese•2003

  • Social norms and the traditional deterrence game

    Open Access•Lisa J Carlson, Raymond Dacey•Synthese•2010

  • Prospect Theory and Coercive Bargaining

    Open Access•Christopher K Butler•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2007

  • Support and Nonsupport for Nationalist Rebellion

    Open Access•Daniel Masters•Political Psychology•2004

  • Model Building With Prospect Theory

    Open Access•Jeffrey D Berejikian•Political Psychology•2002

  • The Prospects for Prospect Theory

    Open Access•William A Boettcher•Political Psychology•2004

  • Senator Opposition to Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Lawrence J Zigerell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • The Psychological Ideas of Amos Tversky and Their Relevance for Political Science

    Open Access•Rose Mcdermott•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2001

  • Presidential Risk Orientation and Force Employment Decisions

    Open Access•Julia Macdonald, Jacquelyn G Schneider et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2017

  • Military Intervention Decisions Regarding Humanitarian Crises

    Open Access•William A Boettcher•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2004

  • Prospect Theory and Political Science

    Jonathan Mercer•Annual Review of Political Science•2005

  • Decision making

    Irving Lester Janis•Decision making•1977

  • Pearl Harbor Reexamined

    Hilary Conroy, Harry Wray•Pearl Harbor Reexamined•1989

  • Bias in judgment

    Norbert L Kerr, Robert J Maccoun et al.•Psychological Review•1996

  • Rational Choice and the Framing of Decisions

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•The Journal of Business•1986

  • Motivated closing of the mind

    Arie W Kruglanski, Donna M Webster•Psychological Review•1996

  • Culture and Organizations

    Geert Hofstede•International Studies of…•1980

  • Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1991

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • War and Reason

    Bruce Bueno De Mesquita, David Lalman•War and Reason•2017

  • Japan's New Order in East Asia

    Edwin O Reischauer, F C Jones•The American Historical Review•1955

  • Decision-Making in Japan

    Fred N Kerlinger•Social Forces•1951

  • Choices, values, and frames

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•American Psychologist•1984

  • The lessons of Pearl Harbor

    J Garry Clifford•The Pacific Review•1991

  • The origins and function of the reference point in risky group decision making the case of the Cuban missile crisis

    Open Access•Glen Whyte, Ariel Levi et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•1994

  • Personality and behavior disorders

    David Rappaport•Journal of Consulting Psychology•1945

  • Mutual Images

    Charles E Neu, Akira Iriye•Journal of American History•1976

  • Dominoes and bandwagons

    Roger Carey•International Affairs•1992

  • Political Implications of Loss Aversion

    Robert Jervis•Political Psychology•1992

  • Prospect Theory and Political Analysis

    Eldar Shafir•Political Psychology•1992

  • Prospect Theory in International Relations

    Rose Mcdermott•Political Psychology•1992

  • Roosevelt and the Munich Crisis

    Barbara Farnham•Political Psychology•1992

  • Prospect Theory and International Relations

    Jack S Levy•Political Psychology•1992

  • Context, Methods, Numbers, And Words

    Open Access•William A Boettcher•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1995

  • A Cognitive Analysis of Japan's 1941 Decision for War

    Open Access•Ariel Levi, Philip E Tetlock•Journal of Conflict Resolution•1980

  • A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments

    Kari Edwards, Edward E Smith•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • International Co-Operation and Loss Avoidance

    Janice Gross Stein•International Journal Canada s…•1992

  • Choosing to Co-Operate

    Janice Gross Stein, Louis W Pauly•International Journal Canada s…•1992

  • Ten Years in Japan

    Tyler Dennett, Joseph C Grew•The Far Eastern Quarterly•1944

  • The group polarization phenomenon

    David G Myers, Helmut Lamm•Psychological Bulletin•1976

  • Pearl Harbor

    Open Access•Bruce Russett, Bruce M Russett•Journal of Peace Research•1967

  • Race to Pearl Harbor

    Akira Iriye, Stephen E Pelz•Pacific Affairs•1975

Unique citing works23
Citations per year0,85
Citation span1999 - 2025 (27)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 21

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae