Who Gets Smart? Explaining How Precision Bombs Proliferate
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6285301 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lauren Kahn (0000-0003-4175-8865, The Council on Foreign Relations, Washington, DC, USA), Michael C Horowitz (0000-0002-3067-7157, University of Pennsylvania, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 67 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-37 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00220027221111143 |
| OpenAlex | W4285006437 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 61 |
Smart weapons represent a key element of military power for countries around the world, and nothing symbolizes them more than smart bombs—the guided aerial bombs that the United States debuted in the Vietnam War. Yet, international relations scholars know little about these weapons and what explains their proliferation. In this paper, we theorize about the key drivers of smart bomb proliferation, including an interaction between the security environment, regime type, and the interest of states in precision to help them follow the law of war. We then introduce a new dataset on smart bombs from 1960-2017. The results show that internal and external security threats make countries more likely to acquire smart bombs. These effects interact with regime type and whether countries are more likely to ratify treaties related to the law of war. GDP per capita and economic capacity also appears fundamental to explaining smart bomb adoption
Business · Computer security · Economics · Element (criminal law · International trade · Key (lock · Nothing · Per capita · Political economy · Political science · Power (physics · Smart power · Sociology · Computer Science · Defense, Military, and Policy Studies · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
The sources of military doctrine
Nonproliferation Norms
Political Institutions and Military Change
Military Power
The Puzzle of Peace
V-Dem Codebook V10
Power versus Prudence
Nuclear Logics
Mobilizing for Human Rights
Military procurement as rational myth
Command of the skies
The MID5 Dataset, 2011–2014
Alliance Treaty Obligations and Provisions, 1815-1944
Estimating between‐ and within‐cluster covariate effects, with an application to models of international disputes
Power at Sea
Separating Fact from Fiction in the Debate over Drone Proliferation
Debating Drone Proliferation
Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons
Promoting Human Rights and Democracy in the Developing World
Precision‐guided munitions and conventional deterrence
Debate on precision‐guided munitions
Unclear physics
Technological Change and the Future of Warfare
Cooperation under the Security Dilemma
Explaining Fixed Effects
Back to the Future
The Determinants of Nuclear Force Structure
The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation
Arms Diffusion and War
Taking a Walk on the Supply Side
The Defense Cooperation Agreement Dataset (DCAD)
Determinants of Nuclear Weapons Proliferation
Ballistic Missiles and International Conflict
Democracy and the Preparation for War
The Army You Have
Military Technology and the Duration of Civil Conflict
A genealogy of the chemical weapons taboo
The Dynamics of International Law
Droning On
International Regimes for Human Rights
Making It Personal
The Causes of Nuclear Proliferation and the Utility of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Regime
United States Hegemony and the New Economics of Defense
Armed, unmanned, and in high demand
Organized violence, 1989-2019
A revolution of democratic warfare? Assessing regime type and capability-based explanations of military transformation processes
Give or Take
Tracking organizations in the world
Armed Conflict 1946-2001
When Do States Follow the Laws of War
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
The Wartime Utility of Precision Versus Brute Force in Weaponry
Measuring Social 'Informatization
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |