Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Inside the digital state

Frontline Work in the Context of Digital Layering

Bibliographic Data

ID6294355
AuthorsAnne Mette Møller (0000-0003-2328-8804, Copenhagen Business School, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume35
Issue2
Pages133-147
Publication date2025-05-16
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1053-1858 • E-ISSN: 1477-9803
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1093/jopart/muaf001
OpenAlexW4406289007
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited47

Following decades of incremental digital development, public agencies today are permeated by a plethora of digital systems and tools. Transcending the dominant focus on individual technologies in the extant literature, this study introduces the concept of “digital layering” to capture the characteristics of this setting and develop a unique contextualized understanding of frontline work in the digital age. Drawing on extensive ethnographic fieldwork in The Danish Agricultural Agency and the Danish Tax Agency, the study shows that digital layering creates a context for frontline work characterized by the experience of complexity, fragmentation, and instability or fragility of digital technologies, which deeply affects both backstage tasks and public encounters. In response, frontline workers employ a range of compensatory practices in the organizational backstage, including workarounds, temporal flexibility, and collaborative IT support, and take on new organizational roles as “digital janitors” and “digital liaisons” to fix errors and raise awareness of the consequences of higher-level decision-making on the ground. During public encounters, they avoid or take precautionary measures when using digital tools and engage in digital detective work on behalf of citizens. Conceptualized as “digital repair work,” these compensatory practices and roles are aimed at protecting professional and bureaucratic values such as efficiency, transparency, responsiveness, and trustworthiness. The study results in a novel theoretical framework to guide future inquiry into digital layering and its implications for (frontline) work and organizations, including employee well-being, the continued enactment of professional and bureaucratic values, and citizens’ trust in government

Archaeology · Business · Context (archaeology · Geography · Layering · State (computer science · Work (physics · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · E-Government and Public Services · Engineering · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Mechanical Engineering

  • Switching lane or carrying the load? A multidimensional impact analysis of government artificial intelligence application and work overload on urban public service

    Open Access•Zhuocheng Lu, Song Wang•Habitat International•2026

  • Reversing the Accountability Chain

    Open Access•Sara C Closs-Davies, Koen Pr Bartels et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2026

  • Policy metaphors we live by

    Open Access•Jade Wong, Kathryn R Berringer et al.•Critical Policy Studies•2026

  • Warm hands entangled in cold technology? Psychologists’ tinkering expertise in digital psychiatry

    Open Access•Emilie Kristine Dyrlev•Social Science & Medicine•2026

  • Framing artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Alexi Gugushvili, Felix Lennert•AI & Society•2026

  • Positioning public sector practitioners as ‘moral crumple zones’

    Open Access•Marta Choroszewicz•Government Information Quarterly•2026

  • Frontline Workers and Civic Tech

    Open Access•Gregory A Porumbescu, Vishal Trehan et al.•Public Administration Review•2025

  • Reading and Writing as Method

    Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, Dvora Yanow•Organizational Ethnography•2009

  • How to prove, how to interpret and what to do? Uncertainty experiences of street-level tax officials

    Open Access•Nadine Raaphorst•Public Management Review•2018

  • A Public Service Gap

    Peter Hupe, Aurélien Buffat•Public Management Review•2014

  • Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory

    Martha S Feldman, Wanda J Orlikowski•Organization Science•2011

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government

    Aurélien Buffat•Public Management Review•2015

  • When the State Meets the Street

    Bernardo Zacka•When the State Meets the Street•2017

  • A Research Agenda for Management and Organization Studies

    Barbara Czarniawska•Research Agenda for Management…•2016

  • Automation and discretion

    Open Access•Noortje De Boer, Nadine Raaphorst•Public Management Review•2023

  • Understanding data professionals in the police

    Open Access•Isabelle Fest, Mirko Tobias Schäfer et al.•Public Management Review•2023

  • Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy

    P L Hupe, Peter Hupe•Research Handbook on Street-Level…•2019

  • Repair Work Ethnographies

    Open Access•Ignaz Strebel, Alain Bovet et al.•Repair Work Ethnographies•2018

  • Digital discretion

    Open Access•Peter André Busch, Helle Zinner Henriksen•Information Polity•2018

  • Street-level morality at the digital frontlines

    Anja Svejgaard Pors, Anja Pors et al.•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2020

  • Opportunities and challenges of digitized discretionary practices

    Open Access•Peter André Busch, Helle Zinner Henriksen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • Co-production in digital transformation of public administration and public value creation

    Open Access•Ada Scupola, Ines Mergel•Government Information Quarterly•2021

  • Close encounters of the digital kind

    Open Access•Ida Lindgren, Christian Østergaard Madsen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Does digital government hollow out the essence of street‐level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools' foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street‐level decision‐making

    Open Access•Justine Marienfeldt•Social Policy and Administration•2024

  • Digital coping

    Open Access•Eric Breit, Cathrine Egeland et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2021

  • Digitalization, Street‐Level Bureaucracy and Welfare Users' Experiences

    Open Access•Hans‐tore Hansen, Kjetil G Lundberg et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2018

  • The Space before Action

    Laurie Goldman, Laurie S Goldman et al.•Social Service Review•2015

  • Serving Clients When the Server Crashes

    Open Access•Lidewij Tummers, Philip Rocco•Public Administration Review•2015

  • From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies

    Open Access•Mark Bovens, Stavros Zouridis•Public Administration Review•2002

  • Reconceptualizing layering—From mode of institutional change to mode of institutional design

    Open Access•Giliberto Capano•Public Administration•2018

  • Street‐level bureaucrats and policy entrepreneurship

    Open Access•Nissim Cohen, Neomi Frisch-Aviram•Public Administration•2021

  • E-government research

    Open Access•Mevlut Yildiz, Mete Yildiz•Government Information Quarterly•2007

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition

    Robert M Emerson, Rachel I Fretz et al.•Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes•2011

  • Organizational Ethnography

    Sierk Ybema, Dvora Yanow et al.•Organizational Ethnography•2009

  • The Bureaucratic Ethos in Street-Level Work

    Open Access•Anne Mette Møller, Kirstine Zinck Pedersen et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2022

  • Talking about machines

    Julian E Orr•Talking about machines•1996

  • Automated, administrative decision‐making and good governance

    Open Access•Ulrik Roehl, Morten Balle Hansen•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Repairing the State

    Open Access•Ayesha Masood, Muhammad Azfar Nisar•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Algorithmization of Bureaucratic Organizations

    Open Access•Albert Meijer, Albert J Meijer et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • Assessments of Digital Client Representations

    Open Access•Ida Bring Løberg•Journal of Public Administration…•2023

  • Deliberation and Deliberative Organizational Routines in Frontline Decision-Making

    Open Access•Anne Mette Møller•Journal of Public Administration…•2021

  • Linguistic Features of Public Service Encounters

    Open Access•Steffen Eckhard, Laurin Friedrich•Journal of Public Administration…•2024

  • Putting Street-Level Organizations First

    Evelyn Z Brodkin•Journal of Public Administration…•2011

  • New Public Management Is Dead--Long Live Digital-Era Governance

    Patrick Dunleavy•Journal of Public Administration…•2005

  • Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research

    Open Access•Bent Flyvbjerg•Qualitative Inquiry•2006

Unique citing works7
Citations per year7
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae