Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Majoritarian systems, rural groups, and (arrested) welfare state development

Bibliographic Data

ID6297892
AuthorsCarl Henrik Knutsen (0000-0002-5470-9045, University of Oslo, corresponding author), Magnus Bergli Rasmussen (0000-0003-3664-0555, Institute for Social Research)
Year2020
Volume41
Issue2
Pages238-254
Publication date2020-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0192-5121 • E-ISSN: 1460-373X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0192512118809106
OpenAlexW4241386581
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited28

While some scholars suggest that rural groups contribute to welfare state expansion, we highlight their incentives to restrain it. The ability of rural groups to achieve this preference hinges on their power resources, but also on the electoral system. We propose that in majoritarian systems, rural groups can often veto welfare legislation. In proportional systems this is less feasible, even for resource-rich groups. Instead, agrarian groups sometimes accept welfare legislation in return for other policy-concessions in post-electoral bargaining. We illustrate the argument with British and Norwegian historical experiences, and test the implications using panel data from 96 democracies. We find evidence that resourceful agrarian groups effectively arrest welfare state development in majoritarian systems, but not in proportional systems. As expected, the electoral system matters less for welfare state expansion when agrarian groups are weak. The results are robust to using alternative estimators, measures, samples and model specifications

Agrarian society · Agriculture · Economics · Incentive · Legislation · Market economy · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Public economics · State (computer science · Welfare · Welfare state · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Welfare state-based agricultural policies in Malaysia

    Open Access•Khoirul Hidayah, Mohd Halim Mahphoth et al.•Cogent Social Sciences•2023

  • Assessing village democracy and welfare in rural Indonesia

    Open Access•Lukman Hakim, Lala M Kolopaking et al.•Frontiers in Political Science•2025

  • The Politics of Time

    Open Access•Magnus Bergli Rasmussen•Social Science History•2024

  • The Economic Effects of Constitutions

    Torsten Persson, Guido Tabellini•Economic Effects of Constitutions•2003

  • The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America

    Peter Flora, Arnold J Heidenheimer•Development of Welfare States in…•2017

  • Welfare Policy and Industrialization in Europe, America, and Russia

    T B Bottomore, Tom Bottomore et al.•Journal of Economic Issues•1974

  • The Politics of Social Solidarity

    Open Access•Peter Baldwin•Politics of Social Solidarity•1990

  • Inequality and Democratization

    Open Access•Ben W Ansell, David Samuels et al.•Inequality and Democratization•2014

  • Strikes are more common in countries with majoritarian electoral systems

    Open Access•Kåre Vernby•Public Choice•2007

  • Unemployment Risks and the Origins of Unemployment Compensation

    Open Access•Wonik Kim•Studies in Comparative…•2010

  • Lloyd George, Liberalism and the Land

    Adam Sutcliffe•The English Historical Review•2002

  • The Political Economy of Agricultural Protection

    Cameron G Thies, Schuyler Porche•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Party Politics and the Organization of the Danish Welfare State, 1890–1920

    Open Access•Asbjørn Sonne Nørgaard•Scandinavian Political Studies•2000

  • A Cross-National Measure of Electoral Competitiveness

    Open Access•Mark Andreas Kayser, Mark Andreas Lindst Auml Dt Kayser et al.•Political Analysis•2015

  • Access to Protection

    Sean D Ehrlich•International Organization•2007

  • A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800–2007

    Open Access•Carles Boix, Michael K Miller et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • The Geographic Distribution of Political Preferences

    Judith Rodden, Jonathan Rodden•Annual Review of Political Science•2010

  • Majoritarian Electoral Systems and Consumer Power

    Ronald Rogowski, Mark Andreas Kayser et al.•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Democratic Pieces

    Open Access•Michael K Miller•British Journal of Political…•2015

  • Democratic differences

    Open Access•Stephanie J Rickard•European Journal of International…•2010

  • Trade and the variety of democratic institutions

    Open Access•Ronald Rogowski•International Organization•1987

  • Great Transformation

    Open Access•Vadim Radaev, Вадим Радаев•Journal of Economic Sociology•2002

  • Electoral rules, class coalitions and welfare state regimes, or how to explain Esping-Andersen with Stein Rokkan

    Philip Manow•Socio-Economic Review•2008

  • Constitutions and Economic Policy

    Open Access•Torsten Persson, Guido Tabellini•The Journal of Economic…•2004

  • Electoral Institutions and the Politics of Coalitions

    Open Access•Trine Iversen, Torben Iversen et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • Inefficient Redistribution

    Open Access•Daron Acemoglu, James A Robinson•American Political Science Review•2001

  • The Political Origins of Coordinated Capitalism

    Open Access•Cathie Jo Martins, Cathie Martins et al.•American Political Science Review•2008

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae