International Cooperation as Interagency Cooperation
Examples from Wildlife and Habitat Preservation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6317305 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Robert Pahre (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2009 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 883-899 |
| Publication date | 2009-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Perspectives on Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1537592709991861 |
| OpenAlex | W2026722665 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 59 |
Cooperation between two agencies presents much the same problem whether these agencies are found in different countries or in the same country. This similarity is generally overlooked because the issues over which agencies negotiate often differ—defense and trade policy at the international level, transportation or land use at the domestic level. Demonstrating the analytical similarity of international cooperation to domestic interagency cooperation requires holding issue area constant while allowing interstate and intrastate units to vary. To do this, I focus on cooperation over wildlife and habitat preservation at the domestic and international levels in the US and Canada. I explain this variation in cooperation in a simple theory in which agency goals and certain features of species interact. Variation between successful and unsuccessful cooperation in this issue area is governed solely by characteristics of the species and agency goals in each management unit, and does not depend on whether a problem is “international” or “domestic.” For scholars who think in terms of nation-states interacting in an anarchic international system, this points to a very different unit of analysis. For those who emphasize the domestic politics of international cooperation, this moves us away from executives constrained by legislatures to look at sub-units within each executive
Agency (philosophy · Business · Economics · Environmental resource management · International trade · Legislature · Negotiation · Political science · Sociology · Unit (ring theory · Variation (astronomy · Wildlife · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Forest Management and Policy · Law · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology
Keeping Faith with Nature
The Political System of the European Union
The Political System of the European Union
Sources, Sinks, and Population Regulation
Human Culture and Large Carnivore Conservation in North America
Veto Players
Interests, Institutions, and Information
Rules for the World
Security and International Relations
Double-Edged Diplomacy
Man, the State, and War
The Anarchical Society
Subnational Foreign Policy Actors
The Anarchical Society
The Dawn of Conservation Diplomacy
The Joint‐decision Trap
Tax Competition in Wilhelmine Germany and Its Implications for the European Union
Endogenous Domestic Institutions in Two-Level Games and Parliamentary Oversight of the European Union
Native American Sovereignty and Natural Resource Management
Legislative Politics in the European Union
The Dawn of Conservation Diplomacy
Theory of international politics
Information Systems in Treaty Regimes
Global Communications and National Power
Four Systems of Policy, Politics, and Choice
Europe's Foreign and Security Policy
When Do “Relative Gains” Impede Trade
Democratic Politics and International Trade Negotiations
Anarchy, Failed States, and Armed Groups
An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism
Diplomacy and domestic politics
Patently Misleading
Loosening the Ties that Bind
Formal Theory and Case-Study Methods in EU Studies
Why National States Comply with Supranational Law
Evidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study
The Anarchical Society
Linkages in the landscape
Conflicts and Choices in Biodiversity Preservation
Dispossessing the Wilderness
Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis
To Save the Wild Bison
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,12 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2013 (5) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |