Evidence and Inference in the Comparative Case Study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6248086 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Douglas Dion (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 127 |
| Publication date | 1998-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Comparative Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-4159 • E-ISSN: 2151-6227 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/422284 |
| OpenAlex | W2017659746 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 123 |
| References cited | 2 |
Comparative case studies often rely on a practice known as selecting on the dependent variable. This technique involves choosing some phenomenon of political interest, gathering data on occurrences of the phenomenon, then determining what characteristics the occurrences have in common. A methodological strategy with a long history, selecting on the dependent variable has found numerous applications in political science, including the study of economic growth, social revolutions, and international conflict.' Selecting on the dependent variable has provided an important method for gathering information when there is relatively little data, though it is not limited to such situations. Its use has recently come under rather sharp attack. If observations are selected based on the value of the dependent variable, then estimates obtained by ordinary least squares will be biased. This bias can not be corrected by the introduction of control variables. Gathering more data will not solve the problem; the bias remains even if the number of observations goes to infinity. In short, inferences drawn from cases selected on the dependent variable are highly suspect.2 Impressive treatments of the problem from the position of comparative case study work have been presented by Barbara Geddes and by Gary King, Robert Keohane, and Sidney Verba.3 They have not only alerted the discipline to an important problem but have suggested concrete ways to deal with problems of selection bias.4 I would like to offer a qualified defense of analyses of a small number of cases selected on the dependent variable. As is well-known, selecting on the dependent variable is perfectly admissible if one is evaluating necessary (as opposed to sufficient) conditions.5 However, with a few exceptions, this argument has gone unnoticed in the debate on case selection.6 By concentrating on the logic of testing necessary conditions, this paper attempts to show that the methodological implications of selecting on the dependent variable are much less threatening to the validity of small-n comparative case study work than has often been claimed
Inference · Political science · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Peace and Human Rights Education · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance
Excorsing Hidden Positovist Demons
Case-Oriented Research
Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America
Strategies of Causal Assessment in Comparative Historical Analysis
Can One or a Few Cases Yield Theoretical Gains?
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Mehr oder weniger? Quantitativer versus qualitativer Vergleich
War and Peace in International Rivalry
Democratization and Research Methods
Comparative Historical Analysis
Uses of Value Judgments in Science
Usos de los juicios de valor en la ciencia
Recruitment and disengagement
Integration of resources in social and healthcare services for ensuring the continuity of care to frail individuals aged 65 or over
The empirical evidence of audience costs theory
Ghosts of the Titanomachy
Case Selection for Case‐Study Analysis
A Tale of Two Cultures
Deterrence and ethnic conflict
Internationally Comparative Research Designs in the Social Sciences
The Contribution of Cultural Heritage Owned by Local Health Authorities in the Humanization of Care
Comparative political studies
Procedural justice in Canadian wind energy development
Development-induced impoverishment among involuntarily displaced populations
A Comparative Cyberconflict Analysis of Digital Activism Across Post-Soviet Countries
A Pragmatic Guide to Qualitative Historical Analysis in the Study of International Relations
Necessary Preconditions for Deliberative Environmental Democracy? Challenging the Modernity Bias of Current Theory
Substance and Methods in the Comparative Study of Policy Change
On the Applicability of the Most Similar Systems Design and the Most Different Systems Design in Comparative Research
L'approccio del case study nella ricerca socio-economica
The Life Cycle of Moral Conflicts
Reason for Hope? The Spotted Owl Injunctions and Policy Change
Uses of Value Judgments in Science
Case Studies
Counterfactuals and the Study of the American Presidency
Direct Democracy in Microstates and Small Island States
Fifteen Years of Empirical Research on Collective Action in Natural Resource Management
Local Means in Value Chain Ends
Culture, context and East Asian high-performing education systems
Ontology, Epistemology, and Multimethod Research in Political Science
Assessing the Trivialness, Relevance, and Relative Importance of Necessary or Sufficient Conditions in Social Science
Canons of research design in qualitative analysis
Overcoming the fear of commitment
Disciplinary Logics in Doctoral Admissions
Set Relations in Social Research
A Simple Multivariate Test for Asymmetric Hypotheses
Divided Government and International Cooperation in Austria-Hungary, Sweden-Norway and the European Union
Narrative Explanation
Quality Meets Quantity
Qualitative Methodology and Comparative Politics
Motivations Behind Donor Funding Refusal
Elite Interviews and State Politics Research
Las Cortes Supremas como mecanismo de distribución de poder
Linking democratic anchorage and regulatory authority
QCA, 25 Years after “The Comparative Method
How Good Is Good Enough? A Multidimensional, Best-Possible Standard for Research Design
An Introduction to Crisp Set QCA, with a Comparison to Binary Logistic Regression
Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research
Collective Action Meets Prospect Theory
Causal Complexity and the Study of Politics
Testing for Necessary and/or Sufficient Causation
A Tale of Two Cultures
Unifying the Study of Asymmetric Hypotheses
Selection Bias in Comparative Research
The Reverend and the Ravens
Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Introduction to the Special Issue “Causal Complexity and Qualitative Methods
Guarding Against False Positives in Qualitative Comparative Analysis
Watching Your Posterior
When More Is Less
Large-N Qualitative Analysis (LNQA)
International Cooperation as Interagency Cooperation
The Moderation Theory Revisited
Social distance in Bosnia‐Herzegovina and the North Caucasus region of Russia
Causation
Case Selection in Public Management Research
The Correlates of Nuclear Proliferation
Practicing Coercion
Rigor Mortis or Rigor, More Tests
Accounting for the Unaccounted
Reducing Uncertainty
Two Stages of Transition from a Region of War to a Region of Peace
Preventive War and Democratic Politics
Hierarchy and Judicial Institutions
Patently Misleading
Formal Theory and Case-Study Methods in EU Studies
Comparing blunders in government
Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA)
The Politics of Immigration Control in Britain and Germany
Toward a Unified Theory of Causality
From Methodology to Practice
Causal Mechanisms
Is There a Necessary Condition for Democracy? The Role of State Capacity in Postcommunist Countries
Comparative Democratization
The Enduring Indispensability of the Controlled Comparison
Methodological Rorschach Tests
The Logic of Historical Explanation in the Social Sciences
Qualitative Methods and Cross-Method Dialogue in Political Science
Is There a (Viable) Crucial-Case Method
Qualitative Research
| Unique citing works | 123 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,8 |
| Citation span | 1982 - 2026 (45) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | Yes |
| Citation types | Neutral: 122 |