Interpreting Subjective Data for Program Evaluation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6330253 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Brian Stipak (Portland State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 305-314 |
| Publication date | 1983-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy Studies Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1983.tb00272.x |
| OpenAlex | W2102440277 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 15 |
This paper examines how to interpret subjective data from citizen and client surveys for purposes of evaluating governmental programs. Six alternative models of the subjective response process are identified, and the implications of the different models are considered. Finally, different strategies for the statistical analysis of subjective data are discussed and illustrated
Data mining · Data science · Econometrics · Management science · Process (computing · Programming language · Statistical analysis · Statistics · Computer Science · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Mathematics · Psychology
Social Indicators of Well-Being
Readings in Attitude Theory and Measurement
Municipal Use of Citizen Surveys
Bureaucratic Encounters
Measurement of Subjective Phenomena
Urban Policy Making and Subjective Service Evaluations
Pseudo-Opinions on Public Affairs
Citizen Satisfaction with Urban Services
Subjective and Objective Measures of Police Service Delivery
Local Governments' Use of Citizen Surveys
Citizen Perception of Police Service Delivery
Statistical Inference in Contextual Analysis
Are there sensible ways to analyze and use subjective indicators of urban service quality
Density, crowding, and satisfaction with the residential environment
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |