Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consistency versus Responsiveness

Do Members of Congress Change Positions on Specific Issues in Response to Their Districts

Bibliographic Data

ID6340318
AuthorsAdam Cayton (0000-0002-4836-6963, University of West Florida, corresponding author), Adam F Cayton (University of West Florida, Pensacola, USA)
Year2017
Volume70
Issue1
Pages3-18
Publication date2017-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1065912916670271
OpenAlexW2523807728
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited58

While democratic theory suggests that representatives should be willing to adjust their issue positions to adapt to new circumstances, politicians face serious political risks from “flip flopping.” How do members of Congress balance these risks? Using an original data set of district economic conditions and opinion from 2007 to 2010 and sets of repeated roll call votes, I leverage the exogenous shock of the Great Recession to explain position change on three major economic policies. I find that position change occurs in response to the constituency on final passage votes, but that partisan pressures exert greater influence, especially on procedural votes. This novel test of responsiveness has implications for the nature of policy representation and the mechanisms behind aggregate responsiveness

Consistency (knowledge bases · Democracy · Economics · Great recession · Labour economics · Leverage (statistics · Macroeconomics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Recession · Shock (circulatory · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Finance

  • Drivers of Congressional Behavior

    Open Access•Benjamin Yoel, Caleb Lucas et al.•American Politics Research•2026

  • Perceived risk of lock-in in the front-end phase of major transportation projects

    Open Access•Chantal C Cantarelli, David Oglethorpe et al.•Transportation•2022

  • Elections and Policy Responsiveness

    Open Access•Richard J Mcalexander, Johannes Urpelainen•Review of Policy Research•2020

  • Do Lawmakers Respond to Crisis Ideologically or Pragmatically

    Open Access•Adam Cayton•American Politics Research•2022

  • Do consistent government policies lead to greater meaningfulness and legitimacy on the front line

    Open Access•Nadine Van Engen, Bram Steijn et al.•Public Administration•2018

  • Negative Voters? Electoral Competition with Loss-Aversion

    Open Access•Ben Lockwood, James Rockey•The Economic Journal•2020

  • Representation When Constituent Opinion and District Conditions Collide

    Open Access•E Scott Adler, Adam Cayton et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • How Public Opinion Information Changes Politicians’ Opinions and Behavior

    Open Access•Julie Sevenans•Political Behavior•2021

  • Why it matters to keep asking why legislatures matter

    Cristina Leston-Bandeira, David Judge•Journal of Legislative Studies•2021

  • Communicative responsiveness in the Mexican Senate

    Sergio A Bárcena Juárez, Yann P Kerevel•Democratization•2021

  • Congressional Communication in a Pandemic

    Lindsey Cormack, Kirsten Meidlinger•Congress & the Presidency•2022

  • Dynamics of the party system

    James L Sundquist•Dynamics of the party system•1983

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Issue Politics in Congress

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin•Issue politics in Congress•2005

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • No Middle Ground

    Seth E Masket, Seth Masket•No middle ground•2009

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • Home Style

    Richard F Fenno•Home Style•1978

  • Issue Evolution

    E G Carmines, James A Stimson•Issue Evolution•2020

  • Presidential Leadership in Congress on Foreign Policy

    Mark Kesselman•Midwest Journal of Political…•1965

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy

    Open Access•Paul Burstein•Political Research Quarterly•2003

  • Why is There so Little Money in U.S. Politics

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, John M De Figueiredo et al.•The Journal of Economic…•2003

  • Legislator voting and shirking

    Open Access•Bruce Bender, John R Lott•Public Choice•1996

  • Time series evidence on shirking in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•John R Lott, Stephen G Bronars•Public Choice•1993

  • Political Shirking, Opponent Quality, and Electoral Support

    Open Access•David Figlio, David N Figlio•Public Choice•2000

  • Changing minds? Not in Congress

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Public Choice•2007

  • Vote Switching on Foreign Policy in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Jungkun Seo•American Politics Research•2010

  • Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate

    Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Constituents’ Responses to Congressional Roll‐Call Voting

    Open Access•Stephen Ansolabehere, Philip Edward Jones•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting

    Gary W Cox, Keith T Poole•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Electoral Competition and Democratic Responsiveness

    John D Griffin•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Ideological Adaptation? The Survival Instinct of Threatened Legislators

    Thad Kousser, Jamie B Lewis et al.•The Journal of Politics•2007

  • Beyond the Demand-Input Model

    Patricia A Hurley, Kim Quaile Hill et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Public Opinion and American Democracy

    Robert Y Shapiro•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress

    Benjamin I Page, Robert Y Shapiro et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1984

  • How Citizens and Their Legislators Prioritize Spheres of Representation

    Open Access•John D Griffin, P Flavin•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Long-Term Change and Stability in House Voting Decisions

    Open Access•Scott R Meinke•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • Parties as Procedural Coalitions in Congress

    Open Access•J A Jenkins, Michael H Crespin et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2005

  • The Puzzle of Representation

    Heinz Eulau, Paul D Karps•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1977

  • Redistricting, Responsiveness, and Issue Attention

    Open Access•Mark Hayes, Matthew Hayes et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Multidimensional Responsiveness

    Open Access•Jeffrey J Harden•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Legislator-Constituency Relations and the Representative Process

    Open Access•Malcolm E Jewell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1983

  • Controlling the Floor

    Eric Schickler, Andrew Rich•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • The Public as Thermostat

    Christopher Wlezien•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Heterogeneity and Representation

    Michael A Bailey, Michael Bailey et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior

    Robert S Erikson•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Congressional Responsiveness to Constituency Change

    Amihai Glazer, Marc Robbins•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting

    Jane Mcintosh Snyder, James M Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2000

  • Voting Change in Congress

    Herbert B Asher, Herbert F Weisberg•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Congressional Behavior and Electoral Marginality

    John L Sullivan, Eric M Uslaner•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence Advantage

    Tim Groseclose•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Electoral Change and Policy Representation in Congress

    Open Access•Walter J Stone•British Journal of Political…•1982

  • Candidate Positioning in US Congressional Elections

    Open Access•Barry C Burden, Barry Burden•British Journal of Political…•2004

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Leapfrog Representation and Extremism

    Open Access•Joseph Bafumi, Michael C Herron•American Political Science Review•2010

  • Congressional Voting over Legislative Careers

    Open Access•Thomas Stratmann•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Political Participation and Government Responsiveness

    Open Access•James H Kuklinski, John E Stanga•American Political Science Review•1979

  • Dynamic Representation

    Open Access•James A Stimson, James Stimson et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • The Strategic Timing of Position Taking in Congress

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Laura W Arnold et al.•American Political Science Review•1997

  • Out of Step, Out of Office

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, D Brady et al.•American Political Science Review•2002

Unique citing works11
Citations per year1,38
Citation span2018 - 2026 (9)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae