Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Parties, Preferences, and Congressional Organization

Explaining Repeals in Congress from 1877 to 2012

Bibliographic Data

ID6340437
AuthorsJordan M Ragusa (College of Charleston), Jordan Ragusa (0000-0002-8600-4306, College of Charleston), Nathaniel A Birkhead (0000-0001-6834-2478, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, USA)
Year2015
Volume68
Issue4
Pages745-759
Publication date2015-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Research Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1065-9129 • E-ISSN: 1938-274X
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1065912915604052
OpenAlexW1410582092
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited30

When does Congress repeal laws enacted by prior generations? Although the substantial body of work on policy creation provides tentative explanations, we believe repeals represent an alternative way of examining the effects of congressional organization on legislative behavior. In this paper, we develop hypotheses based on both the conditional nature of party power and the location of pivot points, and test these hypotheses with a new data set of repeals from 1877 to 2012. We find that the largest effects on Congress’s capacity to repeal legislation are variation in the majority’s positive agenda control and shifts in the gridlock interval. We also find that when the majority claims control of both chambers after a long stretch in the minority, there is an increased likelihood of repeal beyond what is predicted by conditional party government alone. Because the partisan factors in our model have the largest substantive effects, and because repeals do not occur automatically in productive Congresses, we characterize repeals as long-term contests between two great “teams” over the location of the status quo

Control (management · Divided government · Economics · Government (linguistics · Gridlock · Law and economics · Legislation · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Public economics · Repeal · Status quo · Work (physics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Fiscal Policies and Political Economy · Law · Public Administration · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • Organized elite power and clean energy

    Open Access•Sojin Jang, Hongtao Yi•Review of Policy Research•2021

  • Dynamics of Partisan Competition for Legislative Majorities in the U.S. House & Senate, 1959–2020

    Open Access•C Algara•American Politics Research•2024

  • Partisanship, Slavery, and the Demise of the National Road

    Open Access•James Sievert•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Policy Disruption Through Regulatory Delay in the Trump Administration

    Open Access•Sharece Thrower•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Does Substandard Performance Encourage Innovation Adoption

    Open Access•Obed Pasha•The American Review of Public…•2018

  • Can impact assessments tame legislative drift? Event history analysis of modifications of laws across Europe

    Open Access•Dominik Brenner, Mihály Fazekas•Governance•2023

  • Between Two Fires

    Open Access•Sharece Thrower•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • To Revoke or Not Revoke? The Political Determinants of Executive Order Longevity

    Open Access•Sharece Thrower•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Legislative Gridlock and Policymaking Through the Appropriations Process

    Open Access•James M Ryan, Scott L Minkoff•American Politics Research•2023

  • Learning from laboratory mistakes

    Open Access•Megan E Hatch, Joseph Mead et al.•Public Policy and Administration•2021

  • Crossing Over

    Open Access•Nicholas G Napolio, Christian R Grose•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving

    Open Access•E Scott Adler, John D Wilkerson et al.•Congress and the Politics of…•2013

  • Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House

    David W Rohde•Parties and leaders in the…•1991

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Why Parties?

    John H Aldrich•Why Parties?•1995

  • Legislative Leviathan

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Legislative Leviathan•2007

  • Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error

    James J Heckman•Econometrica•1979

  • Polarized America

    Adam Bonica, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Polarized America•2016

  • Pivotal Politics

    Keith Krehbiel•Pivotal Politics•1998

  • Setting the Agenda in the U.S. Senate

    Open Access•Jack L Walker, Jack Walker•British Journal of Political…•1977

  • Agenda Control, Majority Party Power, and the House Committee on Rules, 1937–52

    Open Access•Eric Schickler, Kathryn Pearson•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • Discharge petitions and the conditional nature of agenda control in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Susan M Miller, L Marvin Overby•Party Politics•2012

  • Why Information? Choosing Committee Informativeness in U.S. State Legislatures

    Open Access•James Coleman Battista•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2009

  • War for the Floor

    Open Access•Charles J Finocchiaro, David W Rohde•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2008

  • The New Politics of the Welfare State

    Open Access•Paul Pierson•World Politics•1996

  • The President’s Role in the Partisan Congressional Arena

    Matthew J Lebo, Andrew J O’geen•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • The Politics of Agency Termination

    David E Lewis•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • Political Learning from Rare Events

    Open Access•Daniel Carpenter, Daniel P Carpenter et al.•Political Analysis•2004

  • Divided Government and the Legislative Productivity of Congress, 1945-94

    Open Access•William Howells, William G Howell et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2000

  • Nonproportional Hazards and Event History Analysis in International Relations

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Dan Reiter et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2003

  • After Enactment

    Open Access•Christopher R Berry, Barry C Burden et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1877–1994

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, John S Lapinski•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Change, Continuity, and the Evolution of the Law

    Open Access•Forrest Maltzman, Charles R Shipan•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Are Federal Programs Immortal

    Open Access•J Kevin Corder•American Politics Research•2004

  • The Lifecycle of Public Policy

    Open Access•Jordan Michael Ragusa, Jordan Ragusa•American Politics Research•2010

  • Change We Can Believe In? Using Political Science to Predict Policy Change in the Obama Presidency

    Open Access•Jonathan Woon•PS Political Science & Politics•2009

  • The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•American Political Science Review•1999

  • The Transition to Republican Rule in the House

    Open Access•John H Aldrich, David W Rohde•Political Science Quarterly•1997

Unique citing works11
Citations per year1,22
Citation span2017 - 2025 (9)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae