The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector

Linking Strategic Management and Performance

Bibliographic Data

ID6362365
AuthorsTheodore H Poister (Georgia State University, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume70
Issues1
Publication date2010-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02284.x
OpenAlexW2048709175
LanguageEN
Citations received63
References cited22

While it has become ubiquitous in the public sector over the past 25 years, strategic planning will need to play a more critical role in 2020 than it does at present if public managers are to anticipate and manage change adroitly and effectively address new issues that are likely to emerge with increasing rapidity. This article argues that making strategy more meaningful in the future will require transitioning from strategic planning to the broader process of strategic management, which involves managing an agency’s overall strategic agenda on an ongoing rather than an episodic basis, as well as ensuring that strategies are implemented effectively. Complementing this move to more holistic strategic management, we need to shift the emphasis of the performance movement from a principal concern with measurement to the more encompassing process of performance management over the coming decade in order to focus more proactively on achieving strategic goals and objectives. Finally, agencies will need to link their strategic management and ongoing performance management processes more closely in a reciprocating relationship in which strategizing is aimed largely at defining and strengthening overall performance while performance monitoring helps to inform strategy along the way. Guest editors’ note: In 1942, the University of Chicago Press published a book edited by Leonard D. White titled The Future of Government in the United States. Each chapter in the book presents predictions concerning the future of U.S. public administration. In this article, Theodore H. Poister examines John Vieg’s predictions on the future of government planning published in that book, comments on whether Vieg’s predictions were correct not, and then looks to the future to examine public administration in 2020

Agency (philosophy · Business · Government (linguistics · Performance Management · Political science · Principal (computer security · Process (computing · Process management · Public relations · Public sector · Sociology · Strategic Choice Theory · Strategic control · Strategic financial management · Strategic management · Strategic planning · Strategic thinking · White paper · Accounting and Organizational Management · Computer Science · Marketing · Public Policy and Administration Research