Alfarabi and the Creation of an Islamic Political Science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6401902 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel E Burns (0000-0002-8844-7573, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 365-389 |
| Publication date | 2016-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Review of Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034670516000322 |
| OpenAlex | W2470165166 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 9 |
When discussing the preconditions of liberal Islamic politics, liberal theorists often advocate the reinterpretation of traditional religious texts in light of liberal political theory. Such an interpretive project is worth comparing to a similar project conceived by the medieval Islamic philosopher Alfarabi, whose effort to introduce Greek political philosophy into his political-religious community parallels these efforts to introduce liberal theory into Islamic communities. Alfarabi argued that traditional texts should be reinterpreted in light of a new political science, one based on Greek sources but adapted to the unique needs of a community like his. This article shows how Alfarabi conceived of these adaptations, emphasizing the flexibility that he thought students of Greek political philosophy should adopt in accommodating even Islamic doctrines that they could not fully accept
Aesthetics · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Flexibility (engineering · Islam · Management · Parallels · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Reinterpretation · Social science · Sociology · Theology · Islamic Studies and History · Law · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,38 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |