Considering the animating ethos of designing digital first unemployment services
On the motivation of others
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6416190 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ray Griffin (0000-0003-4580-7310, SETU Waterford Ireland), Antoinette Jordan (0000-0002-9130-9964, SETU Waterford Ireland), Aisling Tuite (0000-0001-7141-5850, SETU Waterford Ireland) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 401-417 |
| Publication date | 2024-09-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/ajs4.365 |
| OpenAlex | W4402123035 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 55 |
This paper explores the animating ethos of digital unemployment services. Unlike human‐to‐human services, where the intention of policy is normally mediated by professionals, digital services are fully designed in the policy imagination. As a result, it is a pressing issue to understand the ethos that animates their development. To address this, we report on design thinking focus groups undertaken to support the development of a disruptive digital unemployment service that sought the views and responses of three different groups—senior policymakers, caseworkers and unemployed people in four European countries. Without prompting, each conversation variously problematised the imputed motivations of unemployed people, suggesting a form of paternalistic motivation that should only risked in‐person. From this, we suggest that the design of digital unemployment services may well be dominated by the axiomatic, uncritical mobilisation of motivation theory. Going further, we offer a brief genealogy of the form of motivation theory that surfaced in the study, highlighting its interesting, shared history in seminal studies on unemployment. As a result, we conclude, that rather than altering welfare, digitisation may reanimate, essentialise and make durable activation in new ways that deepen longstanding processes of “double activation”—activating public employment services as well as the unemployed
Advertising · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Ethos · Multimedia · Political science · Project commissioning · Public relations · Publishing · Sociology · Unemployment · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Law
The achieving society.
Getting Welfare to Work
Behavioral Decision Research
How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis
The Moral Economy of Activation
Focus Groups in Social Research
Carebots and Caregivers
Psycho-Sociological Problems of a Minority Group
Towards digital dole parole
Work, employment, and unemployment
Job search success among the formerly-unemployed
More E-Government, Less Street-Level Bureaucracy? On Legitimacy and the Human Side of Public Administration
Welfare fraud prevention in Australia
(In) Accuracy in Algorithmic Profiling of the Unemployed – An Exploratory Review of Reporting Standards
The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden
Digital welfare fraud detection and the Dutch SyRI judgment
Design Thinking in Policymaking Processes
Does digital government hollow out the essence of street‐level bureaucracy? A systematic literature review of how digital tools' foster curtailment, enablement and continuation of street‐level decision‐making
Violent bureaucracy
Rational skivers or desperate strivers? The problematisation of fraud in the Irish social protection system
Unemployed citizen or ‘at risk’ client? Classification systems and employment services in Denmark and Australia
Workfare as welfare
Motivation in adult education
Evidence for attitudinal-behavioural consistency
Room to move? Professional discretion at the frontline of welfare‐to‐work
Feeling motivated yet? Long‐term unemployed people's perspectives on the implementation of workfare in Australia
Digital by default? A qualitative study of exclusion in digitalised welfare
Inequalities in digital welfare take-up
Rethinking Social Welfare Fraud from a Complex Adaptive Systems Perspective
Inside the Welfare Contract
The Concept of Paternalism in Social Work
From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies
Attitudes versus Actions
Shame on Us
The stealth legitimization of a controversial policy tool
Reflections on Street‐Level Bureaucracy
Policy Work
The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods
Poverty Talk
Scrounger, Worker, Beggarman, Cheat
The Vignette Technique in Survey Research
The Imputation of Motives
Can Robots Understand Welfare? Exploring Machine Bureaucracies in Welfare-to-Work
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |