Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Social workers’ experiences of the use of experts in child protection cases

A comparative study from Norway and England

Bibliographic Data

ID6423769
AuthorsVibeke Samsonsen (0009-0009-8540-789X, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, corresponding author), Rakel Aasheim Greve (0000-0002-3369-7508, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences), Øivin Christiansen (0000-0002-3800-8732, NORCE Research AS), Tone Jørgensen (0000-0003-4420-9247, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences)
Year2024
Volume28
Issue2
Pages325-337
Publication date2024-06-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-1457 • E-ISSN: 1468-2664
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13691457.2024.2364268
OpenAlexW4399724401
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited22

The use of independent experts varies by context, specifically in terms of the dynamics among experts, the child welfare services, and the legal system. This study enriches the current discussion of expertise in child protection cases, a subject that has received limited attention from the perspective of social workers. This explorative study delves into the experiences of social workers in child protection, comparing the use of independent experts in two settings: Norway and England. Comparing these two contexts allows us to better understand the different aspects of independent experts' roles and functions and provide a nuanced picture of their varying contributions. These stories from social work practice in these settings not only inform our understanding of the dynamics within these specific contexts but also spark enquiry into the broader dynamics of expert involvement in child protection cases

Child protection · Political science · Sociology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research · Gender Studies · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work

  • Beyond the Evidence Paradox

    Open Access•Martin Webber, Lynette Joubert et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2026

  • Transferring, Translating, and Transforming

    Paul R Carlile•Organization Science•2004

  • Relational agency in collaborations for the well‐being of children and young people

    Open Access•A Edwards•Journal of Children s Services•2009

  • Introducing Social Science Evidence in Family Court Decision-Making and Adjudication

    Open Access•Laura Robertson, Karen Broadhurst•International Journal of Law…•2019

  • Decision‐making under uncertainty in child protection

    Open Access•Eileen Munro•Child & Family Social Work•2018

  • Legal aid reform

    Stephen Cobb•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2013

  • Children in Limbo

    Open Access•Chris Beckett, Bridget McKeigue•Adoption & Fostering•2003

  • Constructing social research

    Open Access•JeffreyA Ahonen•Journal of Criminal Justice•1994

  • The Importance of Information Processing in Child Protection Cases—A Study of Social Workers’ Integration of Other Professionals’ Knowledge

    Open Access•Rakel Aasheim Greve, Birgitta Persdotter et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2024

  • An Understanding of Optimal Knowledge Management for Social Work Practice

    K Jang•The British Journal of Social Work•2013

  • Social Workers and Independent Experts in Child Protection Decision Making

    Jonathan F Dickens, Jonathan Dickens et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2017

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae