University policies on generative AI in Asia
Promising Practices, Gaps, and Future Directions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6433795 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yun Dai (0000-0002-1199-9855, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author), Sichen Lai (0009-0002-9436-3816, Chinese University of Hong Kong), Cher Ping Lim (0000-0002-4797-1870, Education University of Hong Kong), Ang Liu (0000-0001-9353-0948, UNSW Sydney) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 260-281 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Asian Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1751-6242 • E-ISSN: 1751-6234 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/17516234.2024.2379070 |
| OpenAlex | W4401420184 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 38 |
Considering the opportunities and challenges raised by generative AI (GenAI) technologies, many universities have been developing policies to guide the integration of GenAI in their academic community. Focusing on Asian universities, this paper presents a scoping review of policy development regarding the GenAI integration. Guided by the theoretical framework of technology integration, this study examined the GenAI policies of 30 universities from the QS top 60 Asian universities with inductive content analysis. The review reveals that these policies prioritized text generation applications, student management, and academic integrity, suggesting an effort to uphold traditional academic values and encourage informed adoption. While the universities were at different stages of understanding and managing GenAI, they tended towards a comprehensive approach in formatting their guidance for internal stakeholders and assessment policies. The review also uncovered gaps in policymaking, such as the exclusion of non-academic staff, limited use of evidence-based practices, international misalignments, and a strong adherence to traditional academic paradigms. This scoping review provides a comprehensive and multifaceted overview of policy development in Asian universities, laying the groundwork for global discussions about the role of GenAI in higher education
Academic community · Business · Disk formatting · Engineering ethics · Generative grammar · Knowledge management · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Online Learning and Analytics
A framework for developing university policies on generative AI governance
Generative AI Governance Model in Educational Research
Guiding the uncharted
Multi-Level Barriers to Generative AI Adoption Across Disciplines and Professional Roles in Higher Education
Toward Responsible Integration
Six Institutional Intervention Areas to Support Ethical and Effective Student Use of Generative AI in Higher Education
Why does algorithmic transparency matter for policy acceptance? The mediating role of intent attributions under varying organizational reputations
Think tasks, not tools
Assessment of artificial intelligence-generatedFrom manual to autonomous
Trends, Trajectories and Tomorrows of AI Regulations in Philippine Higher Educational Institutions
Moral Diversity in Institutional Policies Governing the Student Usage of Generative AI
Balancing regulation and innovation
Enhancing Critical Thinking and Self‐Efficacy With GenAI
Grading in an age of assessment reform
Riding the tide of generative artificial intelligence in higher education policy
Understanding Policy Responses to Generative AI in Private Higher Education
Embracing generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education
Handbook of qualitative research
Future research recommendations for transforming higher education with generative AI
Students’ voices on generative AI
Inductive content analysis
Generative AI tools and assessment
Analyzing the role of ChatGPT as a writing assistant at higher education level
A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning
A scoping review of scoping reviews
Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI for Higher Education as Explained by ChatGPT
A “life of optimism” in curriculum, teaching, and teacher education
ChatGPT and its impact on research supervision
A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment
The Substitution Augmentation Modification Redefinition (Samr) Model
Inductive and Deductive
Universities, Clusters, and Innovation Systems
Situated usage of generative AI in policy education
The influence of GenAI on the effectiveness of argumentative writing in higher education
Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions
Scoping studies
Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making
Cluster-Based Policy Making
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |