Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Existing Personal Leadership Prototypes Versus Organizational Leadership Prototypes

How Individuals Manage Tensions Between Leading With Authenticity and Conformity During Their Socialization as Leaders in Organizations

Bibliographic Data

ID6437364
AuthorsBenjamin M Galvin (0000-0001-5995-3170, Marriott School of Business Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA), Jeffrey Bednar (0000-0003-2962-3378, Marriott School of Business Brigham Young University Provo Utah USA), Archie L Bates (0000-0003-3553-2448, United States Military Academy), Archie Bates (Management Department United States Military Academy West Point New York USA)
Year2025
Volume46
Issue5
Pages701-720
Publication date2025-02-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Organizational Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3796 • E-ISSN: 1099-1379
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/job.2863
OpenAlexW4407090773
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited62

Based on qualitative data collected at the United States Military Academy (West Point), this research enhances our understanding of how individuals manage tensions between leading with authenticity and organizational pressures for conformity, resulting from a lack of alignment between their existing personal leadership prototypes and organizational prototypes of leadership. Our theoretical model moves beyond existing research on leader identity construction− which largely treats individuals as blank slates as they construct who they will be as leaders in organizations− by highlighting how individuals learn to enact a leadership approach during socialization that fits within their personal zone of acceptable authenticity and the organization's zone of acceptable conformity. During socialization, individuals may experiment with discarding certain aspects of their existing leadership prototype and/or ignore certain aspects of the organization's leadership prototype, resulting in four primary types of leader–organization fit: Pretender, Believer, Maverick, or Rogue. Our model uncovers important outcomes associated with the varying levels of conformity and authenticity characteristic of these four types of leader–organization fit and highlights how one's fit might evolve over time as individuals engage with and learn from experiences as leaders

Conformity · Political science · Public relations · Socialization · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Management and Organizational Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Handbook of qualitative research

    Norman K Denzin, Yvonna S Lincoln•Handbook of qualitative research•1994

  • Pathways for Positive Identity Construction at Work

    Jane E Dutton, Laura Morgan Roberts et al.•Academy of Management Review•2010

  • Interviewers' perceptions of person–organization fit and organizational selection decisions.

    Daniel M Cable, Timothy A Judge•Journal of Applied Psychology•1997

  • Constructing Professional Identity

    Michael G Pratt, Kevin W Rockmann et al.•Academy of Management Journal•2006

  • The imposter phenomenon in high achieving women

    Pauline Rose Clance, Suzanne Ament Imes et al.•Psychotherapy•1978

  • Who Will Lead and Who Will Follow? A Social Process of Leadership Identity Construction in Organizations.

    D Scott DeRue, Susan J Ashford•Academy of Management Review•2010

  • New opportunities for nurses as patient advocates

    Open Access•Marion E Morra•Seminars in Oncology Nursing•2000

  • Crafting a Job

    Amy Wrzesniewski, Jane E Dutton•Academy of Management Review•2001

  • Person‐organization Fit

    Open Access•Amy L Kristof‐Brown, AMY L KRISTOF•Personnel Psychology•1996

  • A Social Identity Model of Leadership Effectiveness in Organizations

    Open Access•Daan Van Knippenberg, Michael A Hogg•Research in Organizational Behavior•2003

  • A multilevel, identity-based approach to leadership development

    Open Access•David V Day, Michelle M Harrison•Human Resource Management Review•2007

  • The People Make the Place

    Open Access•Benjamin Schneider•Personnel Psychology•1987

  • Building Theories from Case Study Research

    Kathleen M Eisenhardt•Academy of Management Review•1989

  • Social Identity Theory and the Organization

    Blake E Ashforth, Fred A Mael et al.•Academy of Management Review•1989

  • Identity Regulation as Organizational Control

    Open Access•Mats Alvesson, Hugh Willmott•Journal of Management Studies•2002

  • Emotional labor and leadership

    Open Access•William L Gardner, Dawn Fischer et al.•The Leadership Quarterly•2009

  • Provisional Selves

    Open Access•Herminia Ibarra•Administrative Science Quarterly•1999

  • The Social Self

    Open Access•Marilynn B Brewer•Personality and Social Psychology…•1991

  • How do leaders use emotional labor

    Open Access•Ronald H Humphrey•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2012

  • The bright side of emotional labor

    Open Access•Ronald H Humphrey, Blake E Ashforth et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2015

  • Naturalistic inquiry

    Open Access•Yvonna S Lincoln, Egon G Guba et al.•International Journal of…•1985

  • Identity Under Construction

    Blake E Ashforth, Beth S Schinoff•Annual Review of Organizational…•2016

  • Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance

    Open Access•Gretchen M Spreitzer, Scott Sonenshein•American Behavioral Scientist•2004

  • The Self-Concept

    Viktor Gecas•Annual Review of Sociology•1982

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae