Up Close and Powerful
Leaders' Personal Sense of Power and Psychological Closeness to Their Team as Antecedents of Leader Humility, Subordinate Job Engagement and Trust
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6437378 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patrick Liborius (0000-0003-4208-4217, Liechtenstein Business School University of Liechtenstein Vaduz Liechtenstein), Christian Kiewitz (0000-0002-3385-485X, Department of Management and Marketing University of Dayton Dayton Ohio USA), Anna Faber (Justus‐Liebig‐University Gießen Gießen Germany) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1226-1246 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3796 • E-ISSN: 1099-1379 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/job.2883 |
| OpenAlex | W4408983054 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 116 |
Research on leader humility clearly attests to its positive consequences for followers' work‐related outcomes, yet we have only limited knowledge about the antecedents that facilitate leaders expressing humility. Drawing from theoretical works on leadership and power, we posit that leaders' personal sense of power and their psychological closeness to their team constitute important antecedents of leader humility. Specifically, we reason that the impact of supervisors' sense of power on humble leader behavior is qualified by how psychologically close to their subordinates the supervisors deem themselves to be. We investigate the ramifications of this interaction for leader effectiveness by assessing its indirect effects on subordinates' job engagement and trust (via leader‐expressed humility). We test our notions using data from 69 supervisors and their 210 direct subordinates from various organizations and industries in a multi‐level, multi‐source study. Results indicate that supervisors' sense of power relates positively to expressed humility for supervisors who report being close to their team but negatively for supervisors who do not feel close. Results also support our conditional‐indirect‐effects hypotheses involving job engagement and trust as work‐related outcomes. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications for supervisors with a relatively low or relatively high personal sense of power
Closeness · Humility · Political science · Power (physics · Emotional Intelligence and Performance · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Leadership, Courage, and Heroism Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology
Personality and leadership
Social status modulates prosocial behavior and egalitarianism in preschool children and adults
Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance.
Leader narcissism and follower outcomes
Born to choose
The benefits of receiving gratitude for helpers
Modeling How to Grow
Student‐recruited samples in organizational research
Power and consumer behavior
Job Engagement
Trust and team performance
Power and Choice
Power
Measuring the Closeness of Relationships
Common Method Bias in Regression Models With Linear, Quadratic, and Interaction Effects
Interpersonal Power
How Does Leader Humility Influence Team Performance? Exploring the Mechanisms of Contagion and Collective Promotion Focus
The Social Distance Theory of Power
The Good Life of the Powerful
Improving the image of student‐recruited samples
Not So Different After All
Thanks coefficient alpha, we’ll take it from here.
A meta-analysis of humble leadership
Does power corrupt the mind? The influence of power on moral reasoning and self-interested behavior
We don't need more leaders – We need more good leaders. Advancing a virtues-based approach to leader(ship) development
Understanding the Change and Development of Trust and the Implications for New Leaders
When leader humility meets follower competitiveness
Power Increases Social Distance
Power and Goal Pursuit
Control, Interdependence and Power
Humble leadership
Leaders' sense of power and team performance
The Power of Followers That do not Follow
Whether power holders construe their power as responsibility or opportunity influences their tendency to take advice from others
Leader humility and team innovation
Appreciation that inspires
Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion
To Be Fully There
How power corrupts relationships
Controlling other people
Does virtue lead to status? Testing the moral virtue theory of status attainment
Two ways to the top
Give a person power and he or she will show interpersonal sensitivity
The psychological structure of humility
Social power facilitates the effect of prosocial orientation on empathic accuracy
Theories of power
Practical Issues in Structural Modeling
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |