Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Survey measures of democratic attitudes and social desirability bias

Bibliographic Data

ID6445306
AuthorsPedro C Magalhães (0000-0001-8934-4552, Iscte – Instituto Universitário de Lisboa, corresponding author), Laurits F Aarslew (0000-0001-6082-0797, Aarhus University)
Year2025
Pages1-15
Publication date2025-09-12
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Science Research and Methods (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2049-8470 • E-ISSN: 2049-8489
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/psrm.2025.10044
OpenAlexW4414146478
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited64

Research on citizens’ democratic support predominantly relies on surveys. However, the possibility of social desirability biases (SDBs) raises doubts about whether such instruments capture sincere attitudes. We search for evidence of SDB in measures of democratic attitudes in three studies. The first two leverage variations in survey mode (self-completion vs. face-to-face) in the European Social Survey’s Democracy module, drawing on evidence that interviewer absence encourages voicing socially undesirable opinions. The third uses a double-list experiment to estimate the prevalence of an anti-democratic attitude. Using data from as many as 24 European countries, we find no evidence that SDB inflates survey measures of democratic attitudes. These results contribute to our understanding of democratic attitudes and to methodological toolkit for interested scholars

Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Health disparities and outcomes · Social Capital and Networks

  • The Public’s Constraint of Undemocratic Elites

    Open Access•Kevin J Mullinix, David J Ciuk et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Affective Polarization and Democratic Commitment in Brazil

    Open Access•Julian Borba, Ednaldo Aparecido Ribeiro et al.•AMÉRICA LATINA HOY•2026

  • Sympathy for the strong leader in Europe

    Klára Vlachová•European Politics and Society•2026

  • The Item Count Technique as a Method of Indirect Questioning

    Open Access•Judith Droitcour, Rachel Caspar et al.•Wiley Series in Probability and…•2004

  • Who will defend democracy? Evaluating tradeoffs in candidate support among partisan donors and voters

    John Michael Carey, Katherine Clayton et al.•Journal of Elections Public…•2022

  • Combining List Experiment and Direct Question Estimates of Sensitive Behavior Prevalence

    Peter M Aronow, Alexander Coppock et al.•Journal of Survey Statistics and…•2015

  • Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes

    Open Access•Timo Gnambs, Kai Kaspar•Behavior Research Methods•2015

  • Measurement and Control of Response Bias

    Delroy L Paulhus•Measures of personality and…•1991

  • The Majoritarian Threat to Liberal Democracy

    Open Access•G Grossman, Dorothy Kronick et al.•Journal of Experimental Political…•2021

  • Intra-individual variation of extreme response style in mixed-mode panel studies

    Open Access•Julian Aichholzer•Social Science Research•2013

  • Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology

    Open Access•Andrey Lovakov, Elena R Agadullina•European Journal of Social…•2021

  • The Influence of Social Desirability Pressures on Expressed Immigration Attitudes

    Open Access•Alexander L Janus•Social Science Quarterly•2010

  • Lip service to liberal democracy in Western Europe

    Open Access•Lea Kaftan•European Political Science Review•2024

  • Satisfaction with democracy

    Open Access•Jonas Linde, Joakim Ekman•European Journal of Political…•2003

  • A nativist divide? Anti‐immigration attitudes and diffuse support for democracy in Western Europe

    Open Access•Andrej Kokkonen, Jonas Linde•European Journal of Political…•2023

  • Have Europeans Grown Tired of Democracy? New Evidence from Eighteen Consolidated Democracies, 1981–2018

    Open Access•Alexander Wuttke, Konstantin Gavras et al.•British Journal of Political…•2022

  • More positive or More Extreme? A Meta-Analysis of Mode Differences in Response Choice

    C Ye, Janet Fulton et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • Gender Stereotyping Questions Accurately Measure Beliefs About the Traits and Issue Strengths of Women and Men in Politics

    Mirya R Holman•Women & Politics•2023

  • Technocratic attitudes

    Eri Bertsou, Giulia Pastorella•West European Politics•2017

  • Democratic Values and the Transformation of the Soviet Union

    James L Gibson, Raymond M Duch et al.•The Journal of Politics•1992

  • Democratic Hypocrisy and Out-Group Threat

    Gábor Simonovits, Jennifer Mccoy et al.•The Journal of Politics•2022

  • "Racial Attitudes and the "New South

    James H Kuklinski, Michael D Cobb et al.•The Journal of Politics•1997

  • What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum

    Adam N Glynn, Adam Glynn•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • Social Desirability Bias in Cati, IVR, and Web Surveys

    Frauke Kreuter, Stanley Presser et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2008

  • Sensitive Questions in Surveys

    Open Access•Ingmar Ehler, Felix Wolter et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Should Researchers Abandon Questions about “Democracy

    Chad P Kiewiet De Jonge•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  • Who Lies About Electoral Gifts

    Chad P Kiewiet De Jonge•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • (Mis)Measuring Sensitive Attitudes with the List Experiment

    Open Access•Eric Kramon, Keith Weghorst•Public Opinion Quarterly•2019

  • Is Putin’s popularity real

    Timothy Frye, Scott Gehlbach et al.•Post-Soviet Affairs•2017

  • Survey mode and satisfaction with democracy

    Open Access•Hamad Ejaz, Judd R Thornton•Political Science Research and…•2025

  • Estimating Smooth Country–Year Panels of Public Opinion

    Open Access•Christopher Claassen•Political Analysis•2019

  • Statistical Analysis of List Experiments

    Open Access•Graham Blair, Graeme Blair et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Who Is Open to Authoritarian Governance within Western Democracies

    Open Access•Ariel Malka, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2022

  • Under the Veil of Democracy

    Open Access•Hannah S Chapman, Margaret Hanson et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2024

  • On Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Nancy Bermeo•Journal of democracy•2016

  • Polarization versus Democracy

    Open Access•Milan W Svolik•Journal of democracy•2019

  • The Democracy I Like

    Open Access•Lea Kaftan, Theresa Gessler•Government and Opposition•2025

  • Democrats with adjectives

    Open Access•Andreas Schedler, Rodolfo Sarsfield•European Journal of Political…•2007

  • Conceptualizing and Measuring Support for Democracy

    Open Access•Christopher Claassen, Kathrin Ackermann et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • Conceptualizing and Measuring Citizens’ Preferences for Democracy

    Open Access•Pascal D König, Markus B Siewert et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2022

  • Norms of Democracy, Staged Democrats, and Supply of Exclusionary Ideology

    Open Access•Vicente Valentim•Comparative Political Studies•2024

  • Unwelcome Change

    David Waldner, Ellen Lust•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Does Public Support Help Democracy Survive

    Open Access•Christopher Claassen•American Journal of Political…•2020

  • Communists and Democrats

    Open Access•Russell J Dalton•British Journal of Political…•1994

  • Did Shy Trump Supporters Bias the 2016 Polls? Evidence from a Nationally-representative List Experiment

    Alexander Coppock•Statistics Politics and Policy•2017

  • How Solid is Mass Support for Democracy—And How Can We Measure It

    Ronald Inglehart•PS Political Science & Politics•2003

  • Sensitive questions in surveys

    Roger Tourangeau, Ting Yan•Psychological Bulletin•2007

  • Demand Effects in Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Jonathan Mummolo, Erik Peterson•American Political Science Review•2019

  • Democracy in America? Partisanship, Polarization, and the Robustness of Support for Democracy in the United States

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Milan W Svolik•American Political Science Review•2020

  • In the Mood for Democracy? Democratic Support as Thermostatic Opinion

    Open Access•Christopher Claassen•American Political Science Review•2020

  • When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias

    Open Access•Graham Blair, Alexander Coppock et al.•American Political Science Review•2020

  • Increasing Precision without Altering Treatment Effects

    Open Access•Clifford, Geoffrey Sheagley et al.•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Can we Rate Public Support for Democracy in a Comparable Way? Cross-National Equivalence of Democratic Attitudes in the World Value Survey

    Open Access•G Ariely, Eldad Davidov•Social Indicators Research•2011

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae