From green demand to deceptive practices
A cross-cultural study the impact of consumer green preferences on corporate greenwashing behavior in China, Republic of Korea, and Malaysia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6455172 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zhibin Tao (0000-0003-1107-0525, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 100440-100440 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sustainable Futures (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2666-1888 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100440 |
| OpenAlex | W4406299682 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 145 |
In the wave of globalization, the interaction between consumer green preferences and corporate greenwashing behavior is not only about business ethics and market integrity but also about the sustainable development of human society. However, research in this field is still in its infancy, particularly in terms of cross-cultural comparison. This study aims to delve into how consumer green preferences influence corporate greenwashing behavior, particularly within the three representative cross-cultural contexts of China, Republic of Korea, and Malaysia. The goal is to promote the healthy development of green consumption globally and contribute to building a future where humans and nature coexist harmoniously. Utilizing valid survey data from 1433 enterprises across these three countries, and employing SEM and fsQCA methods, the empirical test results indicate that among the three countries: (1) Consumer green preferences lead to corporate engagement in greenwashing behavior. (2) Consumer green preferences lead to market competitive pressure. (3) Market competitive pressure results in corporate greenwashing behavior. (4) Market competitive pressure plays a significant mediating role in the process by which consumer green preferences influence corporate greenwashing behavior. (5) Regulatory environment plays a moderating role in some of the impact paths across different countries, and in some impact paths, the moderating effect is absent. (6) The analysis results using the fsQCA method show that there are 4 different configurations leading to strong greenwashing behavior in enterprises in China, 3 in Republic of Korea, and 4 in Malaysia, and the most influential and explanatory configurations and paths have been identified. This study, with a global perspective, not only advances the theoretical innovation at the academic forefront of corporate governance and sustainability, but it also offers practical intelligent navigation for the strategic global layout of businesses. For policymakers, the findings of this research provide a solid theoretical foundation and forward-looking guidelines for constructing a green, fair, and sustainable market regulatory framework and governance system, holding significant value in guiding future research directions
Advertising · Business · China · Corporate social responsibility · Geography · Greenwashing · Political science · Public relations · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Environmental Sustainability in Business · Marketing
The influence of market demand upon innovation
How the Market Values Greenwashing? Evidence from China
Can evoking nature in advertising mislead consumers? The power of ‘executional greenwashing'
A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations
Greenwash and Green Trust
Scrutiny, Norms, and Selective Disclosure
A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)
A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature
On the evaluation of structural equation models
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Common method biases in behavioral research
When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM
Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error
A checklist for testing measurement invariance
Market competition and regulatory compliance in public, non-profit, and for-profit organizations
Perceived social green preference
Toward sustainable development? Trend analysis of environmental policy in Korea from 1987 to 2040
The Impact of Social Norms of Responsibility on Corporate Social Responsibility Short Title
Hiding in the Crowd
The Impact of Perceived Greenwashing on Customer Satisfaction and the Contingent Role of Capability Reputation
How market pressures and organizational readiness drive digital marketing adoption strategies' evolution in small and medium enterprises
Transforming consumers' intention to purchase green products
Under Pressure? The Link Between Mandatory Climate Reporting and Firms’ Carbon Performance
No End in Sight? A Greenwash Review and Research Agenda
The Reviewer’s Guide to Quantitative Methods in the Social Sciences
Cross-Validation Of Covariance Structures
Cross-cultural issues in business ethics
Cross-Cultural Leadership
A systematic literature review on corporate sustainability
How does command-and-control environmental regulation impact firm value? A study based on ESG perspective
Fostering green innovation performance through open innovation strategies
Does environmental regulation policy help improve business performance of manufacturing enterprises? evidence from China
Advancing Cross-Cultural Research Through Mixed Methods Inquiry
Does greenwashing obstruct sustainable environmental technologies and green financing from promoting environmental sustainability? Analytical evidence from the Indian economy
Information asymmetry and information sharing
Beyond Baron and Kenny
Does environmental regulation improve energy transition performance in China
How Do Competitive Pressures Affect Incentives to Innovate When There Is a Market for Inventions
On the Nature of Competition with Differentiated Products
Set Relations in Social Research
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling
Greenwashing
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Standards of Good Practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Fuzzy-Sets
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |