Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Characterizing the Large‐Scale Structure of Multimodal Semantic Networks

Bibliographic Data

ID7150345
AuthorsRaja Marjieh (0000-0001-8156-1333, Department of Psychology Princeton University, corresponding author), Pol van Rijn (0000-0002-4044-9123, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics), Ilia Sucholutsky (0000-0003-4121-7479, Center for Data Science New York University), Harin Lee (0000-0002-3675-4731, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics), Nori Jacoby (0000-0003-2868-0100, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics), Thomas L Griffiths (0000-0002-5138-7255, Department of Psychology Princeton University)
Year2025
Volume49
Issue10
Pagese70131-e70131
Publication date2025-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCognitive Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cogs.70131
PMID41131782
OpenAlexW4415493983
LanguageEN
References cited57

Humans organize semantic knowledge into complex networks that encode relations between concepts. The structure of those networks has broad implications for human cognitive processes, and for theories of semantic development. Evidence from large lexical networks such as those derived from word associations suggest that semantic networks are characterized by high sparsity and clustering while maintaining short average paths between concepts, a phenomenon known as a “small‐world” network. It has also been argued that those networks are “scale‐free,” meaning that the number of connections (or degree) between concepts follows a power‐law distribution, whereby most concepts have few connections, while a few have many. However, the scale‐free property is still debated, and the extent to which the lexical evidence reflects the naturally occurring semantic regularities of the environment has not been investigated systematically. To address this, we collected and analyzed semantic descriptors, human evaluations, and similarity judgments from four large datasets of naturalistic stimuli across three modalities (visual, auditory, and audio‐visual) comprising 7916 stimuli and 610,841 human responses. By connecting concepts that co‐occur as descriptors of the same stimuli, we construct “multimodal” semantic networks. We show that these networks exhibit a clear small‐world structure with a degree distribution that is best captured by a truncated power law (i.e., the most‐connected concepts are less common than predicted by a perfect power law). We further show that these networks are predictive of human sensory judgments on these domains, as well as reaction times in an independent lexical decision task. Finally, we show that multimodal networks also share overlapping themes with previously analyzed lexical networks, which upon a more rigorous reanalysis are revealed to be truncated too. Our findings shed new light on the origins of the structure of semantic networks by tying it to the semantic regularities of the environment

ENCODE · Semantic memory · Semantic network · Semantic similarity · Child and Animal Learning Development · Language and cultural evolution · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics

  • Comparing partitions

    Open Access•Lawrence J Hubert, Lawrence Hubert et al.•Journal of Classification•1985

  • ImageNet

    Jia Deng, Wei Dong et al.•2009 IEEE Conference on Computer…•2009

  • Scale-free networks are rare

    Open Access•Anna D Broido, Aaron Clauset•Nature Communications•2019

  • The “Small World of Words” English word association norms for over 12,000 cue words

    Open Access•Simon De Deyne, Danielle Navarro et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2019

  • Mixing patterns in networks

    Open Access•M E J Newman•Physical Review E•2003

  • Introducing LexTale

    Open Access•Kristin Lemhöfer, Mirjam Broersma•Behavior Research Methods•2012

  • Over-reliance on English hinders cognitive science

    Open Access•Damián E Blasi, J Henrich et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2022

  • Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon.

    Michael N Jones, Douglas J K Mewhort•Psychological Review•2007

  • Objective Criteria for the Evaluation of Clustering Methods

    William M Rand•Journal of the American…•1971

  • Features of similarity.

    Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1977

  • Topics in semantic representation.

    Thomas L Griffiths, Mark Steyvers et al.•Psychological Review•2007

  • A solution to Plato's problem

    Thomas K Landauer, Susan Dumais et al.•Psychological Review•1997

  • The Large‐Scale Structure of Semantic Networks

    Open Access•Mark Steyvers, Joshua B Tenenbaum•Cognitive Science•2005

  • Scale-Free Networks

    Open Access•Albert-László Barabási•Science•2009

  • The English Lexicon Project

    Open Access•David A Balota, Melvin J Yap et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  • Microsoft Coco

    Open Access•Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire et al.•Computer Vision -- ECCV 2014•2014

  • Retrieval time from semantic memory

    Open Access•Allan M Collins, M Ross Quillian•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1969

  • The University of South Florida free association, rhyme, and word fragment norms

    Open Access•Douglas L Nelson, Cathy L McEvoy et al.•Behavior Research Methods,…•2004

  • Finding community structure in very large networks

    Open Access•Aaron Clauset, M E J Newman et al.•Physical Review E•2004

  • Network ‘Small-World-Ness’

    Open Access•Mark D Humphries, Kevin Gurney et al.•PLoS ONE•2008

  • Power-Law Distributions in Empirical Data

    Aaron Clauset, Cosma Rohilla Shalizi et al.•SIAM Review•2009

  • Gephi

    Open Access•Mathieu Bastian, Sébastien Heymann et al.•Proceedings of the International…•2009

  • A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.

    Allan M Collins, Elizabeth F Loftus•Psychological Review•1975

  • Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks

    Open Access•Duncan J Watts, Steven H Strogatz•Nature•1998

  • Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

    Open Access•Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume et al.•Journal of Statistical Mechanics:…•2008

  • Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks

    Open Access•Albert-László Barabási, Richard Albert et al.•Science•1999

  • Parallelograms revisited

    Open Access•Joseph C Peterson, Dawn Chen et al.•Cognition•2020

  • A circumplex model of affect

    James A Russell•Journal of Personality and Social…•1980

  • Resampling reduces bias amplification in experimental social networks

    Open Access•Mathew D Hardy, Bill D Thompson et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Increasing verbal knowledge mediates development of multidimensional emotion representations

    Open Access•Erik C Nook, Stephanie F Sasse et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2017

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae