Bienvenidos a la conversación

In May 2023, the three of us met with Professor Emerita Ofelia García to share our goals for this Special Issue. Given her expertise in translanguaging, we asked if she would contribute a closing commentary. Noting our admiration of her and her colleagues' work over the past decade (García, 2011; García & Kleyn, 2016; García & Li, 2014; Otheguy et al., 2015) and the ways it has impacted our thinking and areas of research, Dr. García humbly expressed, “All I have done in my work is to describe what I have seen and observed as a way to deconstruct what others have done before.” Mirroring her seemingly simple, yet powerful statement, our vision for this Special Issue is to foster space for critical conversations within our frequently siloed disciplinary communities, where scholars can share observations they have made as a means to decolonize, and transform perspectives around language and the experiences of language-minoritized individuals in science and engineering education (García et al., 2021; Takeuchi et al., 2022). Further, in response to the increased interest in and uptake of translanguaging theory and pedagogy in STEM education research (e.g., Jakobsson et al., 2021; Pérez et al., 2022), this Special Issue was born out of our desire to understand whether there is—or could be and/or should be—consensus around what it means to engage in translanguaging practices, frameworks, and scholarship in science and engineering education. The manuscripts in this Special Issue capture the different and robust ways in which translanguaging as theory and as pedagogy have been taken up by science and engineering researchers and educators from around the world who are working across grade levels and learning environments. From high school science classrooms in the Midwestern US (Bonilla & Morales-Doyle, this issue) to out-of-school science programs for refugees in Lebanon (Salloum, Debs, & BouJaoude, this issue) to kindergartners in Luxembourg (Siry, Wilmes, & Sportelli, this issue), these articles invite us to reckon with science and engineering education from a perspective that centers what individuals from language-minoritized backgrounds are capable of doing, figuring out, and understanding when their language-related resources and practices are viewed in expansive ways (González-Howard et al., 2023). In particular, the manuscripts highlight the brilliance and experiences of individuals who identify, or are identified, as multilingual because they use multiple named languages (e.g., Spanish, Portuguese, and Mandarin) in addition to English (González-Howard & Suárez, 2021), or as multidialectal because they use multiple varieties of the same named language (e.g., African American Vernacular English, Black English, Garifuna, and Caribbean Spanglish) (Baker-Bell, 2020; Degraff, 2005; García et al., 2024; Rickford, 2007). Aiming to foster learning between scholars, this Special Issue brings researchers into conversación, encouraging us to consider and reflect upon different conceptualizations of translanguaging and the ways they are being taken up across disciplinary spaces. For the sake of clarity around how the three of us enter la conversación, we take a moment to present a definition of translanguaging from its origins within bi/multilingual education that aligns with our definition of this construct, and then share how we think the construct can contribute to realizing equitable science and engineering education. For the purposes of this Special Issue, we broadly define translanguaging as the deployment of a bi/multilingual speaker's full semiotic repertoire—which includes multimodal, multisensory, and multilingual elements—without regard for the socially and politically constructed boundaries of named languages, registers, and/or modalities. From this perspective, translanguaging asks researchers and educators to develop expansive perspectives on how minoritized individuals use language, for instance, to make meaning, interact socially, and achieve goals with others. It also asks us to move away from the idea that a bilingual/bidialectal person is made up of two monolinguals wrapped into one (García, 2011; García & Li, 2014). Instead, people have one complex semiotic system (i.e., their idiolect) that comprises multilingual, multimodal, and multisensory dimensions from which they draw upon and use different resources to communicate based on the context they are in (Li, 2018; Otheguy et al., 2015) and their audience (Bell, 2002). Moreover, a translanguaging perspective is inherently political as it questions and pushes back upon socially recognized categories, such as named languages or varieties of those that are privileged, which are intrinsically connected to power structures (e.g., Farsi, Spanish, English, high German), as more legitimate than others. Our conceptualization of translanguaging is not what some call “code-switching” because we, like García and Li (2014), reject the premise that there are codes to switch between. Instead, such moments are evidence of individuals fluidly laminating linguistic resources associated with different named languages to accomplish a specific goal (Suárez, 2020). In the context of science and engineering education, translanguaging can help us extend research and pedagogy that considers and values the heterogeneous nature of how learners share their ideas and engage with each other's thinking (e.g., Rosebery et al., 2010; Warren et al., 2020). Specifically, it offers a theoretical construct and an analytical tool to better study and explain how language-minoritized learners engage in meaning-making and/or design, interact with others, and problem-solve. In addition to showcasing the different robust approaches to translanguaging, as well as presenting our rationale for why translanguaging is productive for us, we would like to offer some considerations for science and engineering education scholars who are interested in embarking on this kind of work. First, we critically heed caution from our research community about translanguaging theory and pedagogy becoming diluted. And by that, we mean being used as a catch-all phrase with no precise meaning and not being taken up to intentionally disrupt harmful, dominant discourses, ideologies, and practices (García et al., 2021; Li, 2023). We have seen this occur before with other theories and pedagogies that were originally proposed for accomplishing transformative work; as they gain popularity, many of their foundational principles are lost (e.g., culturally relevant, responsive, or sustaining pedagogy; Ladson-Billings, 2021). Proactively addressing this concern, we urged contributing authors of this Special Issue to explicitly define language and languaging (Li, 2018) in their work and to articulate whose language and languaging they examined and why. Moreover, we encouraged authors to situate themselves in their research. Who we are, which includes (but is not limited to) the language resources and practices we use across spaces, time, and with different audiences, influences how we experience the world. And for educational researchers, it impacts how we view, relate to, and make sense of others' language and languaging (Boveda & Annamma, 2023; Martínez & Mesinas, 2019; Ríos & Patel, 2023). Implicating ourselves in this process, we next offer some insight into our positionings related to language and languaging and describe how they affect our research and the work we did with this Special Issue. We then share our takeaways from reading this collection of manuscripts and conclude with suggested questions for readers to keep in mind as they engage with the Special Issue. As previously noted, it is of utmost importance that we make our positionalities as researchers transparent, especially those of us who work in learning spaces where prevailing power structures minoritize and undervalue/devalue language practices that do not align with those used by white, Western, dominant language-speaking individuals (González-Howard & Suárez, 2021; Takeuchi et al., 2022). Like the authors whose work comprises this Special Issue, the three of us also represent a swath of intersecting identities, lived experiences, and positions of power (or lack thereof), all of which inform how we see the world, how we navigate the world, and how others view and interact with us in and out of academic spaces. This seemed particularly prescient for us to reflect upon, since all three of us contributed equally to the creation, managing, and finalizing of this Special Issue. For this reason, it is critical to situate ourselves in the work we have done, both as guest co-editors of this Special Issue and as researchers who are committed to making science and engineering education more equitable and just, especially for language-minoritized individuals (Pérez, 2022). We do not intend to simply list our identities as markers of so-called “insiders” (Merriam et al., 2001), but rather to wrestle with dynamics of power and knowledge production in relation to ourselves in science and engineering as disciplines and education (Boveda & Annamma, 2023; Martínez & Mesinas, 2019; Ríos & Patel, 2023). Moreover, the three of us have known each other for over a decade. We navigated graduate school and entered the early stages of our careers as faculty within institutions of higher education. Thus, our evolving positionings are informed by who we were, who we have become as individuals and as a collective, and our interactions with the US education system. Yo, Greses Pérez, am an Assistant Professor of Engineering Education Research at Tufts University, a medium-sized private, Research 1, predominantly white institution in the Northeastern US. My relationship with language and engineering is informed by my experiences as a 1.5-generation Dominican-American, Black Latina, speaker of Caribbean Spanglish, civil engineer, and learning scientist. Most of my STEM professors were male English speakers, who rarely invited the systems of resources and practices of minoritized communities, but throughout my career, I have learned that even within Latinx spaces, the intersectional experiences of Afro and Indigenous Latines are often flattened and invisibilized. Yet, during my time at the University of Puerto Rico in Mayagüez and as a bilingual teacher in Texas, I experienced niche spaces of fogaraté, learning environments where people felt alive through who they were, where their full linguistic and cultural realities were empowered and invited in more than just one language. These rare experiences sparked my curiosity to investigate how people learn engineering in K-16 and how to design inclusive learning environments where people draw on their cultural understandings and language to develop equitable and just engineering solutions (Lemmi & Pérez, 2024; Pérez et al., 2024; Pérez & Marvez, in press; Secules et al., 2023). I, María González-Howard, am an Associate Professor of STEM Education at The University of Texas at Austin, a large research institution recently designated as a Hispanic Serving Institution. I am a white Latina who was born in Argentina and raised with many linguistic and cultural practices common to that country. Porque hablaba español en casa, my early schooling in the US encompassed ESL programming, which I recall as me being frequently pulled out of class to sit in a small room while wearing headphones and repeating back English words and phrases. Because my early memories of school involved feelings of being incomplete and othered, I strive to ensure multilingual students receive more humane and meaningful experiences in education. My lines of scholarship center supporting teachers in recognizing the brilliant ways multilingual students use their existing and entire language repertoire for science (González-Howard, Andersen, et al., 2024). In particular, I integrate translanguaging theory and praxis in elementary science methods courses to guide monolingual and multilingual preservice teachers in problematizing their language orientations and honoring and supporting multilingual students' language use in science practices (Andersen et al., 2022; González-Howard, Méndez Pérez, & Andersen, 2024). I, Enrique (Henry) Suárez, am an Associate Professor at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, a large Research institution in New England. I am a White Latino, multilingual, heterosexual, cisgender, and nondisabled, and I work to make science learning environments more just through affirming and building on minoritized students' linguistic, epistemic, and cultural resources. My scholarship focuses on how young children use their translanguaging practices to make sense of physical phenomena (e.g., Suárez, 2020; Suárez & Otero, 2024), as well as how to support mono- and multilingual teachers recognize and build on the brilliance of their students' ideas and languaging. Central to this work is my professional experience as a (Western-trained) astrophysicist, which began in my home country of Venezuela, spanned multiple continents, and was built on collaborating with multilingual colleagues. These experiences have pushed me to name and dismantle narrow definitions of what counts as “language of science” in learning environments, especially when these limiting perceptions construe minoritized students as needing fixing. As translanguaging scholars in STEM education, we are committed to describing what we see in multilingual communities beyond normative conceptions of language or their unitary semiotic systems. Within this commitment lies our desire to transform how language-minoritized students and their teachers learn and participate in science and engineering, fully recognizing that the instructional models in most science and engineering classrooms have ignored, misrecognized, or outright excluded the myriad language practices that multilingual students draw upon for figuring out the world and solving meaningful problems. Throughout our careers, we have seen how the listening practices of people in positions of power (e.g., white listening subjects; Flores & Rosa, 2015) have led them to miss the beauty, richness, and future outlook in the dexterity of multilinguals to navigate and make sense of the world between languages and cultures. Yet, our research, as well as the work of the Special Issue authors, continue to show that, when listening closely and noticing more expansively, we can better recognize the intelligence and complexity in how multilingual students' use language to engage in engineering design and to understand the natural world around them. The 10 manuscripts included in this Special Issue align with this commitment and desire. To further situate these manuscripts, we briefly offer an account of the work that went into developing this Special Issue. After publishing our call for abstracts in Fall 2022 (Pérez et al., 2022), we received 40 1000-word extended abstracts from scholars across 10 countries whose work focused on language-minoritized learners in science and engineering education. The authors of 15 of these abstracts were invited to submit their full manuscripts within 6 months. After an extensive and rigorous review process, which entailed multiple rounds of reviews and 10 manuscripts were in this a and critical of language in science and engineering education this Special Issue as a to a about the importance and the of in research, and to critically language and/or languaging through the of translanguaging theory and pedagogy (García & Li, 2014; Li, 2018; Otheguy et al., The in this collection highlight the dexterity and brilliance of language-minoritized resources and also on the used by educational researchers who draw upon translanguaging to engage with the language resources and practices of these different are to out to readers as they engage with this Special Issue, we present three takeaways that are to languaging in science and engineering education is translanguaging existing power structures within language and and intersectional identities are critical to addressing language. As we describe each we in and manuscripts from this Special Issue. we a manuscripts we invite readers to consider how these ideas across the entire As the Special Issue manuscripts the political nature of translanguaging (Li, 2018; Otheguy et al., 2015) us to language used within schooling spaces, such as academic (García et al., 2021). Moreover, it also us to disrupt power into the of learning environments that in and languaging being viewed and as more productive and than others. In STEM where the of disciplinary language and minoritized students' practices are often as they frequently receive the or that their translanguaging is a more and ways of understanding and (González-Howard, Andersen, et al., 2024; González-Howard, Méndez Pérez, & Andersen, 2024; Yet, the contributing authors all present translanguaging as a powerful to the and political nature of language within science and engineering education. For instance, in the context of a bilingual high school and issue) the of and critical which translanguaging, to to language, and cultural work how such can within the system of schooling that can transform multilingual students' science learning how this of work is not in their and issue), work from the past of science education research that have explicitly translanguaging with a this collection languages and language practices as & and as to construe the of a language of science or engineering is to the boundaries that have continue to and their communities at the of these back upon such socially constructed Wilmes, and issue) capture what can be when learning environments foster young as they engage in science Specifically, their work the ways in which young children can draw upon resources to make meaning when structures do not their but space for all the articles in the Special Issue, we and about what it means to center and in science and engineering learning environments through translanguaging as a theory and a For the contributing authors recognize that translanguaging is a theory for and working to dismantle power structures that between named languages, registers, and other of For instance, in their and issue) how different that translanguaging their for and in science and engineering from more to to science and engineering as of In authors of manuscripts used translanguaging as an analytical and tool for noticing the productive nature of language-minoritized students' languaging practices for natural This in with these languaging practices as or for learning science and engineering, as in needing or incomplete and needing even in For instance, and issue) use and to understand how multilingual learners perspectives about dimensions of translanguaging during science to disrupt practices that would their and issue) show us that both the and the and that to from the In thinking of translanguaging as a transformative and praxis and and present translanguaging as a that is even to monolingual English speakers, them deconstruct the political around The and dimensions of translanguaging are the of to to a about the boundaries within which we are and transformative and work. These to and power between of in science and engineering education are about the context in which language and students' and experiences while recognizing the of linguistic we also in how different manuscripts with these of translanguaging, from the of the in which these For instance, Wilmes, and issue) that translanguaging practices are of their which both linguistic and semiotic for as the construct is because it the and multisensory of that are often out of definitions of that pushes on our definitions of translanguaging is and issue), who us to think about translanguaging as within varieties of the same named language, rather than to multiple named languages for a of this The authors in this Special Issue use identities, or as analytical in and theoretical and and how people in and how their experiences are For as a to be an power that practices, and other identities intersecting with the disciplinary one while others et al., 2007). to named languages, these are socially constructed and 2014; & are or can be or socially by others & et al., et al., 2001), such as when researchers people to (e.g., are not for goals but they can also be by people specific we as science and engineering education scholars are to take a critical to language, we to recognize that these are for people in identities are for analytical purposes in research and for in the of and such as when Latinx have and through the 2014; et al., 2021), they also et al., To further intersectional identities are an to consider when of language and understanding the experiences of people 2020; 2022). The manuscripts highlight the importance of thinking about whose languages we are at and why we consider of in specific In their study focused on to learn science in the multilingual educational system where English is over Debs, and issue) recognize the of In their translanguaging the language resources of students at home and in their while also the boundaries of disciplinary and supporting and issue) the nature of and language by how in a multilingual engineering research use practices to their and of by Moreover, the study in STEM dynamics while for more equitable and inclusive environments in and issue) questions about how teacher education programs focused on and linguistic support in bilingual/bidialectal and of teacher Within language bilingual education the authors show how the translanguaging as multilingual science educators as they learn to through the theoretical of translanguaging and and issue) present a at the of and language, that African American students' and that teachers with such better in science when to those with This the of language such as African American English and Black English, within translanguaging and that Black should also be and (García et al., 2024). is often to to translanguaging is a through which we can also understand the experiences of of varieties of language and the these in the of people and the of This Special Issue to capture around what it can like to engage in translanguaging theory and pedagogy in science and engineering education research, rather than to represent a We this collection of articles as the of a between scholars from disciplinary spaces, a that us with and around what we mean by language and languaging in science and Moreover, to Dr. Ofelia from the of this we this pushes us to develop and use more critical and expansive to better and support the brilliant ways language-minoritized individuals engage with others, for instance, in design and engineering these questions in we to engage with this collection of offer of translanguaging across science and engineering education research. a la is not to this as no were or in this

Garcia · Humanities · Linguistics · Pedagogy · Political science · Premise · Scholarship · Science education · Sociology · Translanguaging · Higher Education Learning Practices · Law · Multilingual Education and Policy · Philosophy · Second Language Learning and Teaching

• Subjective Intelligence

  Open Access•Greses Pérez, Trevion S Henderson et al.•Education Sciences•2025

  Add to list

• Culturally and Linguistically Sustaining Formative Assessment in science and engineering

  Shakhnoza Kayumova, Akira Harper et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2025

  Add to list

• Collective (Un)Learning

  Open Access•María González‐howard, Karina Méndez Pérez et al.•Science Education•2026

  Add to list

• Translanguaging analysis of multilingual middle school students’ authentic mathematics-based computing experiences

  Esteban Cantú, Sylvia Celedón‐pattichi et al.•Bilingual Research Journal•2025

  Add to list

• Language as “Resource”? Why Science Education's Raciolinguistic Histories Matter Today

  Open Access•Kathryn L Kirchgasler, Diego Román•Journal of Research in Science…•2025

  Add to list

• Pedagogy of Whole Languaging Hearts

  Open Access•Sophia Thraya, Miwa Aoki Takeuchi et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2026

  Add to list

• A Call to Reimagine Science Formative Assessment Systems Through Translanguaging

  Open Access•Caitlin G Mcc Fine, Erin M Furtak•Science Education•2025

  Add to list

• Linguistic Justice

  April Baker-Bell•Linguistic Justice•2020

  Add to list

• Translanguaging with Multilingual Students

  Ofelia García, Tatyana Kleyn•Translanguaging with Multilingual…•2016

  Add to list

• “The Coat Traps All Your Body Heat”

  Ann S Rosebery, Mark Ogonowski et al.•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2010

  Add to list

• Multiple Ways of Knowing

  Beth Warren, Shirin Vossoughi et al.•Handbook of the Cultural…•2020

  Add to list

• Language, Bilingualism and Education

  Open Access•Oreto García, Ofelia García et al.•Translanguaging•2014

  Add to list

• Back in style

  Open Access•Allan Bell•Style and Sociolinguistic Variation•2002

  Add to list

• The weirdest people in the world?

  Open Access•J Henrich, Steven J Heine et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2010

  Add to list

• Identity and Agency in Cultural Worlds

  Carole Cain, Debra Skinner et al.•Identity and Agency in Cultural…•2001

  Add to list

• Borderlands/La Frontera

  Gloria Anzaldúa•Feminist Studies•2025

  Add to list

• Translanguaging in elementary science

  Open Access•Catherine Lemmi, Greses Pérez•International Journal of Science…•2024

  Add to list

• “Estoy Explorando Science”

  Open Access•Enrique Suarez•Science Education•2020

  Add to list

• Going beyond # RetireELL

  Open Access•Miwa Aoki Takeuchi, Shakhnoza Kayumova et al.•Journal of Research in Science…•2022

  Add to list

• Retiring the term English language learners

  Open Access•María González‐howard, Enrique Suarez•Journal of Research in Science…•2021

  Add to list

• Ting, tang, tong

  Open Access•Enrique Suarez, Valerie Otero•Journal of Research in Science…•2024

  Add to list

• Three Decades of Culturally Relevant, Responsive, & Sustaining Pedagogy

  Gloria Ladson-Billings•The Educational Forum•2021

  Add to list

• Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages

  Ricardo Otheguy, Oreto García et al.•Applied Linguistics Review•2015

  Add to list

• Rejecting abyssal thinking in the language and education of racialized bilinguals

  Open Access•Oreto García, Ofelia García et al.•Critical Inquiry in Language…•2021

  Add to list

• Towards critical translanguaging pedagogy – new ways of raising and answering questions from a Global South perspective

  Li Wei•Critical Inquiry in Language…•2023

  Add to list

• The language of ciencia

  Luis E Poza•International Journal of…•2018

  Add to list

• Constructing identities in a linguistically diverse learning context

  Pinky Makoe•International Journal of…•2014

  Add to list

• Black Feminist Thought

  Patricia Hill Collins•Black Feminist Thought•2013

  Add to list

• Positions, positionality, and relationality in educational research

  Cati V De Los Ríos, Leigh Patel•International Journal of…•2023

  Add to list

• Beyond Making a Statement

  Open Access•Mildred Boveda, Subini Ancy Annamma•Educational Researcher•2023

  Add to list

• Bilingual education in the 21st century

  G Richard Tucker•Journal of Multilingual and…•2011

  Add to list

• Language Views for Scientific Sensemaking Matter

  Open Access•María González‐howard, Sage Andersen et al.•Educational Researcher•2023

  Add to list

• Undoing Appropriateness

  Nelson Flores, Jonathan Rosa•Harvard Educational Review•2015

  Add to list

• Chapter 3

  Open Access•J P Gee•Review of Research in Education•2000

  Add to list

• Translanguaging as a Practical Theory of Language

  Open Access•Li Wei•Applied Linguistics•2017

  Add to list

• Power and positionality

  Sharan B Merriam, Juanita Johnson-Bailey et al.•International Journal of Lifelong…•2001

  Add to list

• Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color

  Open Access•Heidi B Carlone, Angela Johnson•Journal of Research in Science…•2007

  Add to list

• Cross-Field Effects and Ethnic Classification

  Open Access•G C Mora•American Sociological Review•2014

  Add to list

• Linguists' most dangerous myth

  Michel Degraff•Language in Society•2005

  Add to list

• Identity Construction

  K A Cerulo•Annual Review of Sociology•1997

  Add to list