Going Nowhere Faster
Did the Covid-19 Pandemic Accelerate the Trend Toward Staying Home
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7161992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eric A Morris (0000-0001-8690-6644, Clemson University), Samuel Speroni (0000-0003-4364-6162, Luskin School of Public Affairs, Institute of Transportation Studies, UCLA), Brian D Taylor (0000-0002-1037-2751, Luskin School of Public Affairs, Institute of Transportation Studies, UCLA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 361-379 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Planning Association (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0194-4363 • E-ISSN: 1939-0130 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01944363.2024.2385327 |
| OpenAlex | W4403902586 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 28 |
Problem, research strategy, and findingsCovid-19 significantly altered work, out-of-home activity participation, and travel, with much activity time being moved into the home. If these patterns hold, they could imply significant long-term changes for homes, businesses, cities, and transportation. We examined data for 34,000 respondents to the American Time Use Survey from 2019 (the pre-pandemic period), 2021 (the pandemic period), and 2022 and 2023 (the post-pandemic period). We used ordinary least squares (OLS) regressions to study participation in 12 out-of-home activities, travel (by auto, transit, and walking), and 16 in-home activities. We observed sharp declines in overall out-of-home activity, travel by all modes, and 10 of the 12 specific out-of-home activities in 2021 compared with 2019, whereas time spent on 13 of the 16 in-home activities rose during that period. By 2023, most of these changes persisted: Time spent out-of-home, traveling by all modes, and on six out-of-home activities remained notably lower in 2023 than in 2019, whereas time spent on nine in-home activities remained higher. The trend away from out-of-home activities and travel appears to be persisting.Takeaways for practiceFirst, given elevated remote work and shopping, planners should consider repurposing some office and retail land uses. Second, with fewer office workers, center cities may have to capitalize on other strengths such as recreational and residential desirability for some market segments, such as young people or others who prefer urban living. Third, more time at home may increase demand for more spacious and affordable housing, perhaps in lower-cost outlying suburbs of large metros and in smaller metropolitan areas. Finally, an end to ever-rising personal travel may lessen the need for costly interventions to increase the capacity of highway and transportation systems
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Geography · Outbreak · Pandemic · Medicine · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies · Virology
Why Working from Home Will Stick
A multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model
How many jobs can be done at home?
The Donut Effect of Covid-19 on Cities
Tobit or not Tobit?
Parents' work arrangements and gendered time use during the Covid ‐19 pandemic
Going nowhere fast
Impact of Covid-19 on leisure consumption in the US
The Evolution of Work from Home
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |