Please Touch the Hedgehog
Haptic Exploration of Mounted Specimens Increases Inspection Time and Positive Evaluation of an Exhibit
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7167238 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Constanze Hampp (0009-0003-0889-204X, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Germany, corresponding author), Magdalena Novak (0000-0002-0676-9000, Leibniz‐Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen Germany), Astrid Lange (0000-0002-3503-1486, Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe Karlsruhe Germany), Stephan Schwan (0000-0003-2451-720X, Leibniz‐Institut für Wissensmedien Tübingen Germany) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 1701-1715 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Science Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0036-8326 • E-ISSN: 1098-237X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/sce.21991 |
| OpenAlex | W4411465761 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 48 |
Natural history museums with their huge collections and exhibits seem to be particularly well suited to create an understanding and awareness of biodiversity. Mounted specimens are typical learning objects in natural history museums. The visual sense obviously plays a role here, but the haptic exploration of certain elements can also be conducive to learning. By combining an observational study and a mixed‐method study using a questionnaire and a semistructured interview, we analyzed how visitors use, evaluate, and benefit from the haptic exploration of mounted specimens. We also investigated whether a combination of a fur piece and a photo would be a less conservation‐sensitive alternative for mounted specimens. Although both studies indicate that visitors only spent a relatively short time at the exhibit, the possibility of haptic exploration led them to engage with more objects and to spend more time with them. This was independent of whether the mounted specimens or the combination of a photo and a piece of fur was presented. In addition, positive evaluations tended to occur more frequently in the conditions in which touching was permitted, whereas negative evaluations were more frequent in the conditions without haptic experience and the lack of opportunity for interaction was often criticized in these conditions
Archaeology · Geography · Haptic technology · Human–computer interaction · Natural (archaeology) · Observational study · Simulation · Animal and Plant Science Education · Computer Science · Medicine · Psychology · Tactile and Sensory Interactions · Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
The Power of Interest for Motivation and Engagement
Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments
Designs for learning
Measuring emotions during epistemic activities
Hand movements
An Evolutionary Upgrade of Cognitive Load Theory
Intelligent science exhibits
There is more to touch than meets the eye
Advancing multimedia learning for science
Science museum educators’ views on object-based learning
Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse
Material Culture, Museums, and Memory
Dead Ringer? Visitors' Understanding of Taxidermy as Authentic and Educational Museum Exhibits
Timing and Tracking
Museum Manners
Measuring Learning Outcomes in Museums, Archives and Libraries
Surprised-curious-confused
Distribution of attention in a gallery segment on the National Socialists' Führer cult
Art, touch and meaning making
Introduction to Sensory Museology
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |