Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Overlooking of Subtractive Changes

Replication and Extension to Stronger Cues and Social Norms

Bibliographic Data

ID7170758
AuthorsAdrien A Fillon (0000-0001-8324-2715, LAPSCO, CNRS UMR 6024 Université Clermont‐Ferrand Clermont‐Ferrand France, corresponding author), Fabien Girandola (0000-0002-1253-1728, Laboratory of Social Psychology (LPS) & Institute on Creativity and Innovations of Aix‐Marseille (InCIAM) Aix‐Marseille University Aix‐en‐Provence France), Nathalie Bonnardel (0000-0002-5876-990X, Research Center for the Psychology of Cognition, Language and Emotion (PsyCLE) & Institute on Creativity and Innovations of Aix‐Marseille (InCIAM) Aix‐Marseille University Aix‐en‐Provence France), Lionel Souchet (0000-0002-5620-2790, Laboratory of Social Psychology (LPS) & Institute on Creativity and Innovations of Aix‐Marseille (InCIAM) Aix‐Marseille University Aix‐en‐Provence France)
Year2025
Volume59
Issue1
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Creative Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-0175 • E-ISSN: 2162-6057
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/jocb.1535
OpenAlexW4408468267
LanguageEN
References cited42

People systematically overlook subtractive changes and favor additive ones when reporting new ideas. In a first preregistered experiment conducted via the Prolific platform among French adults ( N = 477), we replicated experiments 2, 3, and 4 in Adams et al.'s study. We replicated the overlooking of subtraction, as participants reported 1155 additive ideas and only 297 subtractive ideas. Cueing participants (“Remember that you can add things or take them away”) increased the percentage of participants who reported at least one subtractive idea (overall OR = 2.52, improvement condition, φ = 0.18, make it worse condition, φ = 0.24). In a second experiment conducted to test how the framing of the cue influences the overlook, participants reported more subtractive ideas when they read a subtract‐only cue (“remember that you can take things away”), than with a subtract‐then‐add cue. Results therefore provided empirical support for the overlooking of subtractive changes hypothesis, mitigated by a cue. We also found that norms affected the report of new ideas (descriptive OR = 7.49, injunctive OR = 6.86). Cues and injunctive (but not descriptive) norms were both related to the asymmetry

Art · Perception · Replication (statistics) · Social norms approach · Statistics · Subtractive color · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Mathematics · Mental Health Research Topics · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Creativity in Context

    Teresa M Amabile, Mary Collins et al.•Creativity In Context•2018

  • Making replication mainstream

    Open Access•Rolf A Zwaan, Alexander Etz et al.•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2018

  • On problem-solving.

    Karl Duncker, Lynne S Lees•The Psychological Monographs•1945

  • Feature Fatigue

    Open Access•Debora Viana Thompson, Rebecca W Hamilton et al.•Journal of Marketing Research•2005

  • Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment

    Open Access•Robert B Cialdini•Current Directions in Psychological…•2003

  • Same Same, but Different? Relations between Facets of Conscientiousness and Grit

    Open Access•Fabian T C Schmidt, G Nagy et al.•European Journal of Personality•2018

  • Creativity

    Beth A Hennessey, Teresa M Amabile•Annual Review of Psychology•2010

  • The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms

    Open Access•P Wesley Schultz, Jessica M Nolan et al.•Psychological Science•2007

  • Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science

    Open Access•Open Science Collaboration•Science•2015

  • Planetary boundaries

    Open Access•Will Steffen, Katherine Richardson et al.•Science•2015

  • Construct jangle or construct mangle? Thinking straight about (nonredundant) psychological constructs

    Open Access•Gordon Hodson•Journal of Theoretical Social…•2021

  • The Structure of Scientific Revolutions

    Mark S Massa•Structure of Theological…•2018

  • The Social Self

    Open Access•Marilynn B Brewer•Personality and Social Psychology…•1991

  • Avoiding “False Alarms” and “Misses” in Psychological Theory Building

    Open Access•Ulrich Weger, Ulrich W Weger•Psychological Reports•2019

  • Emotional Intelligence and Transformational and Transactional Leadership

    Open Access•Peter D Harms, Marcus Credé•Journal of Leadership &…•2010

  • Nudge

    Open Access•Richard V Adkisson•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • Conceptual ambiguities and measurement issues in sensory processing sensitivity

    Open Access•Susan Hellwig, Marcus Roth•Journal of Research in Personality•2021

  • Pre-registration in social psychology—A discussion and suggested template

    Open Access•A E Van ’t Veer, Roger Giner-Sorolla et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2016

  • Sensory-processing sensitivity and its relation to introversion and emotionality

    Elaine N Aron, Arthur Aron•Journal of Personality and Social…•1997

  • Much ado about grit

    Marcus Credé, Michael Tynan et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2017

  • Seeking Lasting Enjoyment with Limited Money

    Stephanie M Tully, Hal E Hershfield et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae