The very idea of rational irrationality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7354375 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Spencer Paulson (0000-0001-5794-1387, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-21 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Politics Philosophy & Economics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1470-594X • E-ISSN: 1741-3060 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/1470594x231177640 |
| OpenAlex | W4378191632 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 62 |
I am interested in the “rational irrationality hypothesis” about voter behavior. According to this hypothesis, voters regularly vote for policies that are contrary to their interests because the act of voting for them isn’t. Gathering political information is time-consuming and inconvenient. Doing so is unlikely to lead to positive results since one's vote is unlikely to be decisive. However, we have preferences over our political beliefs. We like to see ourselves as members of certain groups (e.g. “rugged individualists”) and being part of those groups depends on having certain beliefs (e.g. about welfare spending). Even if a decrease in welfare spending would be bad for me, I might still benefit by believing in and, consequently, voting for a decrease since my vote is unlikely to make a difference but getting to see myself as a rugged individualist will make a noticeable difference to my wellbeing. It is sometimes argued that this hypothesis fails for empirical reasons. I will argue that things are worse: it is conceptually incoherent. I will do so by first showing that it is a rationalizing explanation and then argue that rationalizing explanations must be reflectively stable from the agent's perspective. The rational irrationality hypothesis is not
Economics · Individualism · Irrationality · Law and economics · Market economy · Methodological individualism · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Rationality · Voting · Voting behavior · Welfare · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Economic Theory and Institutions · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Introduction to Mathematical Sociology
Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences
The Norm of Belief
Controlling Attitudes
"Coherent Arbitrariness"
Against Content Normativity
The Normativity of Content
The Power of Suggestion
Direction of Fit
An economic theory of democracy
Making Up Your Mind
Democratic Reason
Two Kinds of Agency
Evidentialism and the Numbers Game1
The Psychology of Self‐defense
“Hot” Political Cognition
The Retrieval of Ethics
The toxin puzzle
The Logic of Collective Action
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy
A Nonpragmatic Vindication of Probabilism
An Objective Justification of Bayesianism I
Expected Accuracy Supports Conditionalization—and Conglomerability and Reflection
Assertion, Knowledge, and Context
How Truth Governs Belief
Doxastic Deliberation
No Exception for Belief
The Ethics of Belief
Epistemic Teleology and the Separateness of Propositions
A Wild West of the Mind
The Wrong Kind of Reason
Are knowledgeable voters better voters
Party Over Policy
No Norm Needed
The Philosophical Quarterly
Social Behavior as Exchange
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |