Delving into social entrepreneurship in universities
Is It Legitimate Yet
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7366481 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rıdvan Çınar (0000-0002-5640-224X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 217-232 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Regional Studies Regional Science (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2168-1376 • E-ISSN: 2168-1376 |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/21681376.2019.1583602 |
| OpenAlex | W2944004467 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 30 |
Universities have recently been pressurized to go beyond their economic conceptualization of third-mission activities and contribute to solving grand societal challenges in the regions in which they are located. Social entrepreneurship has emerged as one mechanism by which universities can address societal challenges. Despite a growing awareness of universities’ potential and expectations to enhance social entrepreneurship in their geographical vicinities, how these processes become legitimized within a higher education context has received surprisingly little attention. This paper, therefore, explores factors affecting the (de)legitimacy process of social entrepreneurship within universities. Using a single case study design that relies on semi-structured interviews carried out in a Dutch public university, it was found that organizational legitimacy of social entrepreneurship remains unestablished. Furthermore, the legitimacy process is affected by (1) the expectations of stakeholders, the difficulty of measuring social impact and third-mission indicators; (2) an overemphasis on high-tech research and application as an organizational identity; (3) the absence of a leader in the field and lack of organizational recognition; and (4) stringent regulations of public institutions in the Netherlands. In addition, enhancing social entrepreneurs is hindered by the lack of place-based belonging among the student body. Consequently, this paper argues that a holistic approach that focuses on the specificities of universities and the increasing competitive environment in which they have come to function, the potential facilitating role of other organizational actors in the field, and designing appropriate policy instruments and incentives would benefit universities in their efforts to enhance social entrepreneurship
Business · Conceptualization · Context (archaeology · Economics · Entrepreneurship · Field (mathematics · Identity (music · Incentive · Legitimacy · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social entrepreneurship · Sociology · Cultural Industries and Urban Development · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Management and Organizational Studies
University-Industry joint undertakings with high societal impact
How entrepreneurial ecosystems support the formation of international base-of-the-pyramid ventures
Social entrepreneurship in higher education
Invisible innovation
Higher education institutions and innovative entrepreneurship
Contextualizing the role of universities to regional development
Indicators of the Third University Mission
Indicadores Da Terceira Missão Universitária
The social impact of universities
Institutions and organizations
New Institutionalism in the Analysis of Complex Organizations
The Civic University
Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling
Social entrepreneurship as an essentially contested concept
Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions
Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation
Institutional Logics
Revisiting the Third Mission of Universities
The Meaning of Social Resources
Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education
Organizational Legitimacy
Defining place attachment
Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions
Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis
Place-making and Place Maintenance
Legitimacy as a Social Process
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2025 (7) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |