Can Ally Work Mobilize Voice? Male Leaders' Ally Work on Women's Pro‐Group Voice

Bibliographic Data

ID7473731
AuthorsCarolyn T Dang (0000-0001-6117-714X, Smeal College of Business The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA, corresponding author), Soojin Oh (0000-0002-9053-2830, The University of Hong Kong Pok Fu Lam Hong Kong), Apoorva Joshi (0000-0001-5011-4370, Ross School of Business University of Michigan Ann Arbor Michigan USA), Aparna Joshi (0000-0002-7366-177X)
Year2026
Volume47
Issue1
Pages25-43
Publication date2026-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Organizational Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0894-3796 • E-ISSN: 1099-1379
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/job.70007
OpenAlexW4412784152
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited79

Organizations rely on members from relatively advantaged social groups to act as allies. Yet, whether these individuals' ally work enables or inhibits those from relatively disadvantaged social groups to engage in social change efforts remains unclear. We focus on male leaders' ally work and draw on intergroup relations research to theorize its consequences. We expect that the type of ally work male leaders engage in can differentially impact female employees' pro‐group voice. Specifically, we expect self‐focused ally work (or when male leaders critically examine themselves) to be more effective in promoting women's pro‐group voice when compared to relational‐focused ally work (or when male leaders focus on building supportive relationships with women). Across three studies—a field study with working female employees (Study 1) and two experiments (Studies 2 and 3)—we test this prediction and find some support that the indirect effect of male leaders' self (vs. relational) ally work is mediated by female employees' increased feelings of hopefulness. Moreover, we theorize and find full support for our prediction that the indirect effect is stronger when female employees hold fixed (vs. incremental) theory about intelligence. Implications for theory and practice are discussed

Group (periodic table · Political science · Work (physics · Chemistry · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Psychology · Social and Intergroup Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access