Beyond metrics
Corporate governance and the reordering of rural power in regenerative agriculture
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7476571 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jorge Fernández-Vidal (0000-0001-9603-9337, Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA), corresponding author), Silverio Alarcón (0000-0001-5823-4238), Silverio Lorenzo Alarcon (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 123 |
| Pages | 104081-104081 |
| Publication date | 2026-02-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Rural Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0743-0167 • E-ISSN: 1873-1392 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104081 |
| OpenAlex | W7131351665 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
Corporate regenerative agriculture programs are transforming the governance of sustainability in rural areas. Through contracts, incentive schemes, and monitoring systems, agrifood corporations now influence farming practices that were once guided by public institutions or local knowledge. While these initiatives claim to promote ecological regeneration, they also redefine how power, trust, and responsibility are distributed across the countryside. Drawing on comparative analysis of forty-five corporate regenerative agriculture programs and thirty-four interviews with farmers, agronomists, and sustainability managers, this study examines how these programs are designed and governed, and how they affect rural autonomy and legitimacy. The analysis identifies four main governance logics: compliance, experimentation, partnership, and branding. Each reflects a different balance between corporate control and farmer participation, from audit-driven oversight to collaborative learning. The findings show that compliance and branding-driven models often strengthen corporate authority while offering only symbolic participation. In contrast, partnership and experimentation models allow limited spaces for negotiation and trust-building. Across all cases, the alignment between corporate timelines and the slower rhythms of ecological and social change determines whether regenerative transitions deliver real transformation or remain performative. By viewing regenerative agriculture as a form of rural governance reordering, the paper connects institutional design with questions of justice, autonomy, and legitimacy. It argues that the success of regeneration depends not only on ecological practices but on how democratic and inclusive the governance structures behind them become. • Corporate regenerative agriculture acts as a new form of rural governance. • Four governance logics shape rural adaptation: compliance, experimentation, partnership, branding. • Temporal and legitimacy gaps limit the depth of corporate regenerative transitions. • “Legitimacy traps” explain why audit-driven systems sustain credibility without real change. • True regeneration depends on co-adaptive governance and shared risk between firms and farmers
Agriculture · Autonomy · Corporate governance · General partnership · Incentive · Legitimacy · Power (physics · Sustainability · Timeline · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Rural development and sustainability
A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes
What Is Regenerative Agriculture? A Review of Scholar and Practitioner Definitions Based on Processes and Outcomes
Regenerative Agriculture
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research
Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems
Purposive sampling
Soil, capital and power
Complex adaptive governance systems
Twenty‐five years of Living Under Contract
The Regenerative Lens
Neoliberal environmentality
Doing qualitative and interpretative research
A social–ecological approach to managing multiple agro-ecosystem services
Regenerative agriculture
Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance
Introduction to the symposium
Governing Farmers through data? Digitization and the Question of Autonomy in Agri-environmental governance
Re-imagining the rural
Unlocking sustainability? The power of corporate lock-ins and how they shape digital agriculture in Germany
Sustainability assemblages
Governing mountain landscapes collectively
Corporate-Led Environmental Governance
Green rebranding
The co-optation of regenerative agriculture
Corporate concentration and power matter for agency in food systems
Sustainability transitions in the agri-food sector
Beyond food for thought – Directing sustainability transitions research to address fundamental change in agri-food systems
Institutional work in diverse niche contexts
The Historical Dynamics of Social-Ecological Traps
Transforming landscapes and mindscapes through regenerative agriculture
Legal and institutional foundations of adaptive environmental governance
Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access, and price
Who gains from contract farming? Dependencies, power relations, and institutional change
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |