Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Historical Overview and Pathologization of Sexual and Gender Diversity in Brazilian Psychological Assessment

Bibliographic Data

ID7514541
AuthorsAngelo Brandelli Costa (0000-0002-0742-8152, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, corresponding author), Silvia H Koller (0000-0001-9109-6674, North-West University), Henrique Caetano Nardi (0000-0001-6058-1642, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)
Year2026
Volume60
Issue1
Publication date2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIntegrative Psychological and Behavioral Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1932-4502 • E-ISSN: 1936-3567
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s12124-026-09973-4
PMID41801575
OpenAlexW7134284365
LanguageEN
References cited62

This article analyzes personality assessment instruments used in Brazilian psychology in the early 2000s. It seeks to understand how tests that may contain discriminatory biases related to sexual and gender diversity coexisted with guidelines that defend human rights and the elimination of prejudice. The historical evolution of gender and sexuality assessment in psychology is explored, from the 18th-century concept of “single sex” to the development of psychological tests that measure “masculinity” and “femininity”. The article examines the ethical and technical implications of using such instruments, highlighting their potential discriminatory biases and contradictions with ethical guidelines. Historical influences on these instruments are addressed, including evolutionary and psychoanalytic theories, as well as the development of personality tests. The shift from the pathologization of gender and sexuality variations to the recognition and affirmation of diversity is also discussed. The article highlights a paradox in Brazilian psychology, where regulatory bodies emphasize ethical principles and human rights, yet historically approved and maintained tests with clear discriminatory biases. This is attributed to a historical disconnect between empirical psychology and critical/feminist psychology in Brazil, unlike the more integrated approach in the North American context where the tests were developed

Context (archaeology · Diversity (politics · Gender diversity · Gender psychology · Human sexuality · Personality · Psychoanalytic theory · Psychological research · Psychological science · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Psychological Testing and Assessment · Psychology and Mental Health

  • Hereditary genius

    Francis Galton•1869

  • Sex and personality

    Lewis M Terman, Catharine Cox Miles•1936

  • On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny.

    Sandra Lipsitz Bem, Sandra Lipsitz•Journal of Consulting and…•1977

  • Mothers, Fathers, and Peers as Socialization Agents of Sex-Typed Play Behaviors in Young Children

    Judith H Langlois, A Chris Downs•Child Development•1980

  • Integrating the Study of Transgender Spectrum and Cisgender Experiences of Self-Categorization from a Personality Perspective

    Open Access•Charlotte Chuck Tate, Cris P Youssef et al.•Review of General Psychology•2014

  • Imprinting and the Establishment of Gender Role

    John Money•Archives of Neurology And…•1957

  • Sex Reassignment at Birth

    Milton Diamond•Archives of Pediatrics and…•1997

  • A Multiphasic Personality Schedule (Minnesota)

    Starke R Hathaway, J McKinley et al.•The Journal of Psychology•1940

  • Minding the body

    Jack Drescher, Peggy T Cohen-Kettenis et al.•International Review of Psychiatry•2012

  • Labeling People

    Martin S Staum•Labeling People•2003

  • The measurement of psychological androgyny

    Sandra L Bem•Journal of Consulting and…•1974

  • Construct Validation of the Comrey Personality Scales

    Andrew L Comrey, Thomas E Backer•Multivariate Behavioral Research•1970

  • The measurement of masculinity and femininity

    Open Access•Jill G Morawski•Journal of Personality•1985

  • Psychology and gender at the turn of the century

    Henry L Minton•American Psychologist•2000

  • Avoiding heterosexual bias in language

    Committee on Lesbian and Gay Concerns•American Psychologist•1991

  • The Failure of Cis Feminism

    Jordan J Tudisco•TSQ Transgender Studies Quarterly•2023

  • Diagnosing difficult women and pathologising femininity

    Open Access•Jane M Ussher•Feminism & Psychology•2013

  • Bias in Psychological Assessment

    Jeffrey N Chernin, Jeffrey Chernin et al.•Measurement and Evaluation in…•1997

  • Off With the Old, On With the New

    Open Access•Janet T Spence•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2011

  • Instrumental and Expressive Traits, Trait Stereotypes, and Sexist Attitudes

    Open Access•Janet T Spence, Camille E Buckner•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2000

  • The Social Psychology of Sex and Gender

    Open Access•Stephanie A Shields, Elaine C Dicicco•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2011

  • Distinguishing Between Sex and Gender

    Open Access•Charlene L Muehlenhard, Zoë D Peterson•Sex Roles•2011

  • The Development and Validation of the Genderism and Transphobia Scale

    Open Access•Darryl B Hill, Brian L B Willoughby•Sex Roles•2005

  • The Variability Hypothesis

    Stephanie A Shields•Signs: Journal of Women in…•1982

  • Maternal behavior and perceived sex of infant

    Jerrie Ann Will, Patricia A Self et al.•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•1976

  • Toward a redefinition of sex and gender

    Rhoda K Unger•American Psychologist•1979

  • Avoiding heterosexist bias in psychological research

    Gregory M Herek, Douglas C Kimmel et al.•American Psychologist•1991

  • Questioning current definitions of gender identity

    Open Access•Michael Fleming, Michael Z Fleming et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•1980

  • Masculinity, Femininity, and Transsexualism

    Open Access•Anna Herman-Jeglińska, Anna Grabowska et al.•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2002

  • Queer Diagnoses

    Open Access•Jack Drescher•Archives of Sexual Behavior•2010

  • Variability as Related to Sex Differences in Achievement

    Leta Stetter Hollingworth•American Journal of Sociology•1914

  • Gender-related traits and gender ideology

    Janet T Spence•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Imagining Transgender

    David Valentine•Imagining Transgender•2007

  • Feminism and psychology

    Alice H Eagly, Asia A Eaton et al.•American Psychologist•2012

  • Functionalism, Darwinism, and the psychology of women

    Stephanie A Shield, Stephanie A Shields et al.•American Psychologist•1975

  • Standards of Care for the Health of Transsexual, Transgender, and Gender-Nonconforming People, Version 7

    Eli Coleman, Walter Bockting et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • Impacto dos 15 Anos do Satepsi na Avaliação Psicológica Brasileira

    Open Access•Caroline T Reppold, Ana Paula Porto Noronha•Psicologia Ciência e Profissão•2018

  • Interfaces entre Psicologia e Direito

    Open Access•Marina Wanderley Vilar De Carvalho•Psicologia Ciência e Profissão•2013

  • Masculinity-femininity

    Open Access•Anne Constantinople•Feminism & Psychology•2005

  • Feminismos, teoria queer e psicologia social crítica

    Open Access•Lenise Santana Borges•Psicologia & Sociedade•2014

  • Trend Analysis of Medical Publications About LGBT Persons

    John E Snyder•Journal of Homosexuality•2011

  • Em direito a um futuro trans

    Open Access•Mário Felipe De Lima Carvalho, Mario Carvalho et al.•Sexualidad Salud y Sociedad (Rio…•2013

  • The Medical Construction of Gender

    Suzanne J Kessler•Signs: Journal of Women in…•1990

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae