The Double‐Edged Sword of Servant Leadership
Motivational Climates, Helping Behavior, and Financial Performance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7514939 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Therese E Sverdrup (0000-0002-1871-9406), Alexander Madsen Sandvik (0000-0002-3320-2595), Vidar Schei (0000-0002-8131-0099), Claudia Buengeler (0000-0003-1276-2232) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 497-517 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Organizational Behavior (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0894-3796 • E-ISSN: 1099-1379 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/job.70031 |
| OpenAlex | W4415983249 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 96 |
Research on the effects of servant leadership on firm success has yielded inconsistent results. Connecting servant leadership theory to achievement goal theory, we theorize that servant leadership exerts both beneficial and detrimental effects on firms by shaping two distinct motivational climates: mastery climate and performance climate. These climates, in turn, serve as mechanisms linking servant leadership to two complementary dimensions of firm success: relational outcomes (firm helping behavior) and performance outcomes (financial performance). We tested these assertions using a two‐study design comprising an experimental study with 99 simulated firms working for a fictitious leader (Study 1) and a multisource, time‐lagged field study of 120 small firms and their leaders (Study 2). Study 1 demonstrated that servant leadership strengthens firm mastery climate and weakens firm performance climate relative to a control condition (directive leadership). Study 2 revealed that servant leadership was positively related to firm helping behavior mediated by firm mastery climate but negatively related to firm financial performance mediated by firm performance climate. This negative indirect relationship was moderated by autonomy in the firm, which weakened the positive effect of firm performance climate on firm financial performance. Our findings clarify both the benefits and pitfalls of servant leadership for firms, highlighting that its relational advantages may come at the expense of financial outcomes under certain conditions. This research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of when and how servant leadership is advantageous for organizational success
Autonomy · Control (management · Field (mathematics · Servant · Servant leadership · SWORD · Human Behavior and Motivation · Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors
Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness
Potential Problems in the Statistical Control of Variables in Organizational Research
Servant Leadership
Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance.
Bayesian Estimation and Inference
Scale Adaptation in Organizational Science Research
Helping and Voice Extra-Role Behaviors
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias.
What Goes Around Comes Around
Servant leadership
Assembling Fragments Into a Lens
Do Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership Explain Variance Above and Beyond Transformational Leadership? A Meta-Analysis
Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors
Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
The future of employment
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Advances in Bayesian Model Fit Evaluation for Structural Equation Models
Are the effects of servant leadership only spurious? The state of research on the causal effects of servant leadership, recommendations, and an illustrative experiment
The context deficit in leadership research
Driven to Win
Can Engagement Go Awry and Lead to Burnout? The Moderating Role of the Perceived Motivational Climate
Servant Leadership and Team Performance
Advantages of Monte Carlo Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects
Perceived mastery climate, felt trust, and knowledge sharing
Energy at work
Self‐determination theory and work motivation
Motivational climates, work passion, and behavioral consequences
Decision-Making Groups Attenuate the Discussion Bias in Favor of Shared Information
CEO Servant Leadership and Organizational Profitability
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |