Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cultural drift, indirect minority influence, network structure, and their impacts on cultural change and diversity

Bibliographic Data

ID7526850
AuthorsJiin Jung (0000-0002-4372-2930, University of Kansas, corresponding author), Aaron Bramson (0000-0001-8511-3714, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research), William D Crano (0000-0003-3392-6937, Claremont Graduate University), Sarah E Page (0000-0003-2723-5216, University of Michigan), Scott E Page, John H Miller (0000-0002-1696-5603, Decision Sciences (United States))
Year2021
Volume76
Issue6
Pages1039-1053
Publication date2021-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Psychologist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-066X • E-ISSN: 1935-990X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1037/amp0000844
PMID34914438
OpenAlexW4200105916
LanguageEN
Citations received3

The present research investigates how psychological mechanisms and social network structures generate patterns of cultural change and diversity. The two psychological mechanisms studied here are cultural drift and indirect minority influence; the former is parameterized by an error rate ε) and the latter by a leniency threshold (λ). The patterns of cultural change are examined in terms of magnitude (small vs. large), speed (gradual vs. rapid), and frequency (frequent vs. rare). Diversity and polarization in a society are examined in terms of global cultural variation (inverse Simpson index) and local neighborhood difference (Hamming distance). Key findings are that in networks with high connectivity or local community structures (complete, scale-free, random, and modular networks) cultural drift can produce a rapid, large, and rare pattern of cultural change (punctuated equilibrium), whereas in lattice or small world networks, it produces a more gradual change pattern. Indirect minority influence robustly produces a gradual, small, and frequent pattern of cultural change (gradualism) across various network structures. When cultural change occurs in social networks that have a modular community structure, indirect minority influence generates a regime of cultural diversity whereas cultural drift generates a polarized regime. Finally, cultural drift and indirect minority influence generate distinct tipping points for social change in different network structures, but prediction of whether and when cultural change emerges is difficult at tipping points in both cases. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved

Cultural diversity · Diversity (politics · Economic geography · Economics · Political science · Politics · Regime change · Sociology · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · Law · Mental Health Research Topics · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • From inclusion to innovation

    Jiin Jung, Timothy R Gulden•International Journal of…•2025

  • Cultural changes as seen in Chinese urban TV series

    Open Access•Tengfei He, Huijie Shi et al.•Current Psychology•2024

  • Populism as a Conceptual Problem

    Open Access•Ernesto Domínguez López, Valerian Thielicke-Witt et al.•Societies•2024

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae