Legitimating exclusion and inclusion

Culture’, education and entitlement to local urban citizenship in Tianjin and Lanzhou

Bibliographic Data

ID7724925
AuthorsSophia Woodman (0000-0002-7099-2717, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume21
Issue7
Pages755-772
Publication date2017-10-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCitizenship Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1362-1025 • E-ISSN: 1469-3593
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13621025.2017.1353739
OpenAlexW2736485213
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited41

The paradigmatic ‘migrant’ in China is a worker of rural origin, but more than 30% of the one-fifth of the population living and working away from their place of hukou registration are inter-urban migrants, a group mostly neglected by scholars. Based on ethnographic observation and interviews from two Chinese cities – one on the coast, one in the impoverished interior – this article examines how a range of types of migrants deal with citizenship and mobility. It shows that a key criterion for being able to settle in a new place and gain access to local social citizenship is migrants’ level of ‘culture,’ expressed primarily through formal education. Linking access to local citizenship for migrants to their ‘cultural quality’ goes largely unquestioned, as it is connected to the legitimacy of education as a means of differentiating among citizens more generally. This logic shapes family migration strategies as parents seek to ensure that their children will receive an education that enables access to the kinds of good jobs and benefits that enable full citizenship wherever they live

Citizenship · Economics · Inclusion–exclusion principle · Political science · Politics · Sociology · China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Gender Studies · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access