Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Anticipating Discussion about a Product

Rehearsing What to Say Can Affect Your Judgments

Bibliographic Data

ID7842464
AuthorsAnn E Schlosser (0000-0003-2914-9581, University of Washington), Sharon Shavitt (0000-0001-6052-3397, Small Business Administration)
Year2002
Volume29
Issue1
Pages101-115
Publication date2002-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Consumer Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-5301 • E-ISSN: 1537-5277
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1086/339924
OpenAlexW2129763103
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited33

This research examines one aspect of the common but relatively understudied consumer behavior context of group interaction. We argue and demonstrate that the mere anticipation of group discussion can influence people's product attitudes. This occurs because anticipating discussion shifts people's focus toward the criteria dominating what they are mentally rehearsing to discuss. Such a shift is important because people commonly refer primarily to less important information when they explain or prepare to discuss their attitudes. Three studies demonstrate that when people are forming an attitude toward a product while anticipating discussion, this focus on less important information substantially affects people's attitudes toward the product. As a result, depending on the evaluative implications of what is rehearsed, anticipating group discussion can lead to attitudes that are more extreme, more moderate, or similar to those of people not anticipating discussion. Moreover, when the criteria predominantly rehearsed for discussion do not represent how consumers typically evaluate the products, attitudes affected by the group-anticipation context do not correspond to product judgments made outside of the group-anticipation context

Affect (linguistics) · Anticipation (artificial intelligence) · Business · Context (archaeology) · Focus (optics) · Focus group · Negative information · Product (mathematics) · Rehearsing · Communication · Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification · Digital Marketing and Social Media · Marketing · Media Influence and Health · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • You Get What You Pay For? Self-Construal Influences Price-Quality Judgments

    Ashok K Lalwani, Sharon Shavitt•Journal of Consumer Research•2013

  • Anticipated Group Interaction

    Adam Duhachek, Shuoyang Zhang et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2007

  • Self-disclosure versus self-presentation on social media

    Open Access•Ann E Schlosser•Current Opinion in Psychology•2020

  • Using Message Form to Stimulate Conversations

    Open Access•Hans Hoeken, Piet Swanepoel et al.•Communication Theory•2009

  • Introspecting about Reasons can Reduce Post-Choice Satisfaction

    Open Access•Timothy D Wilson, Douglas J Lisle et al.•Personality and Social Psychology…•1993

  • Logic and Conversation

    H P Grice•Speech Acts•1975

  • Ignoring Irrelevant Information

    Open Access•Patrick Rabbitt, P M A Rabbitt•British Journal of Psychology•1964

  • The role of attitude objects in attitude functions

    Open Access•Sharon Shavitt•Journal of Experimental Social…•1990

  • Acting on one's attitudes

    Open Access•M Snyder, Deborah Kendzierski•Journal of Experimental Social…•1982

  • The Functional Approach to the Study of Attitudes

    Daniel Katz•Public Opinion Quarterly•1960

  • Effects of affective and cognitive focus on the attitude–behavior relation

    Murray G Millar, Abraham Tesser•Journal of Personality and Social…•1986

  • Thinking too much

    Timothy D Wilson, Jonathan W Schooler•Journal of Personality and Social…•1991

  • Biased information search in group decision making

    Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Stefan Schulz‐Hardt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2000

  • Social and cognitive strategies for coping with accountability

    Philip E Tetlock, Linda Skitka et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1989

  • Reasoning and the weighting of attributes in attitude judgments

    Gary M Levine, Jamin Halberstadt et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1996

  • The complexity–extremity effect and age-based stereotyping

    Patricia W Linville•Journal of Personality and Social…•1982

  • Effects of introspecting about reasons

    Timothy D Wilson, Sara D Hodges et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • The process of cognitive tuning in communication

    Robert B Zajonc•Journal of Abnormal & Social…•1960

  • Reference Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions

    William O Bearden, Michael J Etzel•Journal of Consumer Research•1982

  • Brand Community

    Albert M Muniz, Thomas C O''Guinn et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2001

  • Sequential Choice in Group Settings

    Dan Ariely, Jonathan Levav•Journal of Consumer Research•2000

  • The Role of Explanations and Need for Uniqueness in Consumer Decision Making

    Itamar Simonson, Stephen M Nowli et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2000

  • The Social Uses of Advertising

    Mark Ritson, Richard Elliott•Journal of Consumer Research•1999

  • Ignoring Irrelevant Information

    J Wesley Hutchinson, Joseph W Alba•Journal of Consumer Research•1991

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0,21
Citation span2007 - 2020 (14)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae