Play it again Sam
Some notes on the productivity of repetition in popular music
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7976635 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Richard Middleton (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1983 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 235-270 |
| Publication date | 1983-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Popular Music (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0261-1430 • E-ISSN: 1474-0095 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0261143000001641 |
| OpenAlex | W2145529710 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 3 |
Repetition, as a component of musical structure in popular songs, has long played an important part in ‘popular common-sense’ definitions, and criticisms, of the music. ‘It's monotonous’; ‘it's all the same’; ‘it's predictable’: such reactions have probably filtered down from the discussions of mass culture theorists. From this point of view, repetition (within a song) can be assimilated to the same category as what Adorno termed standardisation (as between songs). Of course, the significance of the role played by such techniques in the operations of the music industry – their efficacy in helping to define and hold markets, to channel types of consumption, to pre-form response and to make listening easy – can hardly be denied; it is, however, equally difficult to reduce the function of repetition simply to an analysis of the ‘political economy’ of popular music production and its ideological effects. Despite Adorno's critical assault (see Adorno 1941), despite later twists to the theory by, for instance, Fredric Jameson (1981), who argues that rather than being a negative quality of mass culture, repetition is simply a fundamental characteristic of all cultural production under contemporary capitalism, the question of repetition refuses to go away. Why do listeners find interest and pleasure in hearing the same thing over again? To be able to answer this question, which has troubled not only mass cultural theory but also traditional philosophical aesthetics, as well as more recent approaches such as psychoanalysis and information theory, would tell us more about the nature of popular music, and hence, mutatis mutandis , about music in general, than almost anything else. We must start by locating repetition within an overall theory of musical syntax
Aesthetics · Art · Criticism · Epistemology · Ideology · Linguistics · Literature · Musical · Pleasure · Political science · Politics · Popular music · Repetition (rhetorical device · Sociology · Law · Music History and Culture · Music Technology and Sound Studies · Musicology and Musical Analysis · Philosophy · Psychology
On and On
Everyday I Write the Book
The ›song-ification‹ of the Tannhäuser Overture in Lars von Trier’s Epidemic
An Analysis of Common Songwriting and Production Practices in 2014-2015 Billboard Hot 100 Songs
Comparer l’incomparable
Conexões sensíveis
Towards a Social Semiotic Approach of the Analysis of Emotion in Sound and Music
Percorsi di identità narrativa nella memoria difficile
Decoding the meanings of the sound art installation The Visitors by Kjartansson
We Are Gone”
Discourses of unity and purpose in the sounds of fascist music
Harmonic Stasis and Oscillation in Björk's Medúlla
Riff Schemes, Form, and the Genre of Early American Hardcore Punk (1978-83)
Grooves and Waves
The media and reform
Estruturas musicais do samba-enredo
Songwriters and song lyrics
Language ideology and kadongo kamu flow
La musique composée par John Powell pour Dragons (2010)
Som, Imaginação E Conhecimento
Radio broadcasting in Canada
Articulating musical meaning/re-constructing musical history/locating the 'popular
Teach you to rock'? Popular music in the university music department
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 1985 - 2026 (42) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |