Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Women Robed in Independence

How Women Judges Influence Perceptions of Judicial Independence in Europe

Bibliographic Data

ID7991804
AuthorsEmilee Smart (0000-0002-9950-879X, Northern Arizona University, corresponding author), Andrea G Dooley Wood (University of Kentucky), Abbie Wood (0000-0002-3345-6755)
Year2025
Volume13
Issue1
Pages166-183
Publication date2025-01-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Law and Courts (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2164-6589 • E-ISSN: 2164-6570
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1017/jlc.2024.23
OpenAlexW4406249445
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited69

The number of women on high courts across the globe has been steadily increasing. Recent estimates found that women now make up 61% of the judiciary in European countries (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2019). The large number of women now serving in judicial positions has resulted in a changing demographic makeup of courts. While the majority might think this is a step forward for diverse representation, there is ultimately a dichotomy between judicial accountability that comes as a result of increased diversity in descriptive representation and judicial independence. Given this dichotomy, along with the increase in women on courts, it follows that the public’s perceptions of courts’ independence has the potential to change. We explore this phenomenon by asking the following question: How does the presence of women on high courts impact perceptions of judicial independence among the public? Using survey data gathered from respondents in twenty-seven European countries from 2016 to 2022, we examine how the dynamics of an increasing number of women on high courts alters the public’s perceptions on the level of independence of the court in their country. We draw from literature on judicial independence as well as women political elites and corruption. Importantly, we document that increasing the percentage of women on courts results in higher perceptions of judicial independence for women. Overall, our findings highlight important trends regarding gender diversity in political institutions and how changes in descriptive characteristics shape perceptions of judicial independence

Independence (probability theory · Judicial Independence · Perception · Political science · Politics · Statistics · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Does Descriptive Representation Increase Acceptance of Judicial Decisions

    Open Access•Jay N Krehbiel•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Do Women Legislators Matter?

    Open Access•Michael B Berkman, Michael Berkman et al.•American Politics Quarterly•1993

  • Bribery and corruption

    Open Access•Muhammad Nurul Houqe, Muhammad Kaleem Zahir-ul-Hassan et al.•Crime Law and Social Change•2020

  • My Fair Lady? Inferring Organizational Trust From the Mere Presence of Women in Leadership Roles

    Open Access•Mansi Joshi, Amanda B Diekman•Personality and Social Psychology…•2022

  • Women, War, and Winning Elections

    Open Access•Jennifer L Lawle, Jennifer L Lawless•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • The 2008 presidential election, political efficacy, and group empowerment

    Christopher Stout, Katherine Tate•Politics Groups and Identities•2013

  • Do Americans perceive diverse judges as inherently biased

    Open Access•Yoshikuni Ono, Michael A Zilis•Politics Groups and Identities•2021

  • Introducing the Historical Gender Equality Index

    Open Access•Selin Dilli, Sarah Carmichael et al.•Feminist Economics•2018

  • Towards greater legitimacy in global governance

    Jan Aart Scholte•Review of International Political…•2011

  • Campaigning on the welfare state

    Open Access•Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik•Journal of European Social Policy•2017

  • Cognitive Heuristics, Inter-Institutional Politics, and Public Perceptions of Insulated Institutions

    Open Access•Michael A Zilis•International Journal of Public…•2020

  • Gender and corruption

    Open Access•Anand V Swamy, Anand Swamy et al.•Journal of Development Economics•2001

  • Do women always behave as corruption cleaners

    Open Access•Alice Guerra, Tatyana Zhuravleva•Public Choice•2022

  • Women's Underrepresentation in the U.S. Congress

    Open Access•Kira Sanbonmatsu•Daedalus•2020

  • Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections

    Monika L Mcdermott•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts

    Nancy Scherer, Brett Curry•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Opposition to Women Political Leaders

    Open Access•Yoshinobu Endo, Yoshikuni Ono•Women & Politics•2023

  • Citizens’ Ambivalence toward Female Politicians

    Sun Young Park, Young Min Baek•Women & Politics•2019

  • "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes

    Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • An Integrated Model of Women's Representation

    Leslie A Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A Schwindt‐bayer et al.•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Gender Quotas, Women’s Representation, and Legislative Diversity

    Tiffany D Barnes, Mirya R Holman•The Journal of Politics•2020

  • Breaking the Judicial Glass Ceiling

    María C Escobar-Lemmon, Valerie J Hoekstra et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Explaining Judicial Diversity

    Open Access•Mark S Hurwitz, Drew Noble Lanier•State Politics & Policy Quarterly•2003

  • Descriptive Representation, Judicial Nominations, and Perceptions of Presidential Accomplishment

    Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Representation•2023

  • Gender-Based Evaluations Of Integrity Failures Women Leaders Judged Worse

    Open Access•Benjamin J Thomas, Gregory A Petrow•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • The Politics of Women's Presence on High Courts

    Open Access•Christopher Shortell, Melody E Valdini•Politics & Gender•2022

  • Electoral Institutions and the Manifestation of Bias

    Open Access•Melody E Valdini•Politics & Gender•2013

  • Women Get the Job Done

    Open Access•Nichole M Bauer, Ivy A M Cargile•Politics & Gender•2023

  • The Intersectional Dynamics of Descriptive Representation

    Open Access•Celeste Montoya, Christina Bejarano et al.•Politics & Gender•2022

  • More is Better

    Lonna Rae Atkeson, Nancy Carrillo•Politics & Gender•2007

  • Measuring Bias against Female Political Leadership

    Open Access•Mark Setzler•Politics & Gender•2019

  • Someone like Me

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections

    Open Access•Monika L Mcdermott•Political Research Quarterly•1998

  • Forming Impressions of Political Leaders

    Open Access•Mark Pancer, S Mark Pancer et al.•Political Psychology•1999

  • The Symbolic Benefits of Descriptive and Substantive Representation

    Open Access•Mark Hayes, Matthew Hayes et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • Gender Differences in Legislator Responsiveness

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen, Bailey Sanders et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2020

  • Corruption as an obstacle to women’s political representation

    Open Access•Aksel Sundström, Lena Wängnerud•Party Politics•2016

  • The Impact of Women Legislators on Humanitarian Military Interventions

    Open Access•Patrick E Shea, Charlotte Christian•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2017

  • Restoring trust in the police

    Open Access•Tiffany D Barnes, Emily Beaulieu et al.•Governance•2018

  • The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption

    Open Access•Andrew Wroe, Nancy Allen et al.•European Political Science Review•2013

  • A judges' revolution? Political corruption and the judiciary in Italy

    Open Access•Donatella Della Porta•European Journal of Political…•2001

  • Will Women Executives Reduce Corruption? Marginalization and Network Inclusion

    Open Access•Monika Bauhr, Nicholas Charron•Comparative Political Studies•2021

  • Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies

    Open Access•Ted Brader, Joshua A Tucker et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • Corruption and Trust

    Open Access•Stephen D Morris, Joseph L Klesner•Comparative Political Studies•2010

  • The Legitimacy of Representation

    Open Access•Sveinung Arnesen, Yvette Peters•Comparative Political Studies•2018

  • Women Politicians, Institutions, and Perceptions of Corruption

    Open Access•Tiffany D Barnes, Emily Beaulieu•Comparative Political Studies•2019

  • Engendering” Politics

    Open Access•Tiffany D Barnes, Stephanie M Burchard•Comparative Political Studies•2013

  • Judicial Reshuffles and Women Justices in Latin America

    Open Access•Ignacio Arana Araya, Melanie M Hughes et al.•American Journal of Political…•2021

  • Partisans in Robes

    Open Access•Stephen P Nicholson, Thomas G Hansford•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates

    Leonie Huddy, Nayda Terkildsen•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy

    Open Access•Anthony Clayton, Amanda Clayton et al.•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law

    Open Access•Yoshikuni Ono, Michael A Zilis•American Journal of Political…•2022

  • Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives

    Open Access•Cheryl Boudreau, Scott A Mackenzie•American Journal of Political…•2014

  • Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Tom S Clark, Jonathan P Kastellec•American Politics Research•2015

  • The Influence of Women Legislators on State Health Care Spending for the Poor

    Open Access•Marie Courtemanche, Jonathan Green et al.•Social Sciences•2017

  • Political Cleaners

    Open Access•Anne Marie Goetz•Development and Change•2007

  • Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited

    H-E Sung•Social Forces•2003

  • Intersecting Interests

    Open Access•Michael D Minta, N E Brown•Du Bois Review Social Science…•2014

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae