Women Robed in Independence
How Women Judges Influence Perceptions of Judicial Independence in Europe
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 7991804 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Emilee Smart (0000-0002-9950-879X, Northern Arizona University, corresponding author), Andrea G Dooley Wood (University of Kentucky), Abbie Wood (0000-0002-3345-6755) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 166-183 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-10 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Law and Courts (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2164-6589 • E-ISSN: 2164-6570 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1017/jlc.2024.23 |
| OpenAlex | W4406249445 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 69 |
The number of women on high courts across the globe has been steadily increasing. Recent estimates found that women now make up 61% of the judiciary in European countries (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2019). The large number of women now serving in judicial positions has resulted in a changing demographic makeup of courts. While the majority might think this is a step forward for diverse representation, there is ultimately a dichotomy between judicial accountability that comes as a result of increased diversity in descriptive representation and judicial independence. Given this dichotomy, along with the increase in women on courts, it follows that the public’s perceptions of courts’ independence has the potential to change. We explore this phenomenon by asking the following question: How does the presence of women on high courts impact perceptions of judicial independence among the public? Using survey data gathered from respondents in twenty-seven European countries from 2016 to 2022, we examine how the dynamics of an increasing number of women on high courts alters the public’s perceptions on the level of independence of the court in their country. We draw from literature on judicial independence as well as women political elites and corruption. Importantly, we document that increasing the percentage of women on courts results in higher perceptions of judicial independence for women. Overall, our findings highlight important trends regarding gender diversity in political institutions and how changes in descriptive characteristics shape perceptions of judicial independence
Independence (probability theory · Judicial Independence · Perception · Political science · Politics · Statistics · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology
Do Women Legislators Matter?
Bribery and corruption
My Fair Lady? Inferring Organizational Trust From the Mere Presence of Women in Leadership Roles
Women, War, and Winning Elections
The 2008 presidential election, political efficacy, and group empowerment
Do Americans perceive diverse judges as inherently biased
Introducing the Historical Gender Equality Index
Towards greater legitimacy in global governance
Campaigning on the welfare state
Cognitive Heuristics, Inter-Institutional Politics, and Public Perceptions of Insulated Institutions
Gender and corruption
Do women always behave as corruption cleaners
Women's Underrepresentation in the U.S. Congress
Voting Cues in Low-Information Elections
Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts
Opposition to Women Political Leaders
Citizens’ Ambivalence toward Female Politicians
"Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes
An Integrated Model of Women's Representation
Gender Quotas, Women’s Representation, and Legislative Diversity
Breaking the Judicial Glass Ceiling
Explaining Judicial Diversity
Descriptive Representation, Judicial Nominations, and Perceptions of Presidential Accomplishment
Gender-Based Evaluations Of Integrity Failures Women Leaders Judged Worse
The Politics of Women's Presence on High Courts
Electoral Institutions and the Manifestation of Bias
Women Get the Job Done
The Intersectional Dynamics of Descriptive Representation
More is Better
Measuring Bias against Female Political Leadership
Someone like Me
Race and Gender Cues in Low-Information Elections
Forming Impressions of Political Leaders
The Symbolic Benefits of Descriptive and Substantive Representation
Gender Differences in Legislator Responsiveness
Corruption as an obstacle to women’s political representation
The Impact of Women Legislators on Humanitarian Military Interventions
Restoring trust in the police
The role of political trust in conditioning perceptions of corruption
A judges' revolution? Political corruption and the judiciary in Italy
Will Women Executives Reduce Corruption? Marginalization and Network Inclusion
Which Parties Can Lead Opinion? Experimental Evidence on Partisan Cue Taking in Multiparty Democracies
Corruption and Trust
The Legitimacy of Representation
Women Politicians, Institutions, and Perceptions of Corruption
Engendering” Politics
Judicial Reshuffles and Women Justices in Latin America
Partisans in Robes
Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates
All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy
Ascriptive Characteristics and Perceptions of Impropriety in the Rule of Law
Informing the Electorate? How Party Cues and Policy Information Affect Public Opinion about Initiatives
Source Cues and Public Support for the Supreme Court
The Influence of Women Legislators on State Health Care Spending for the Poor
Political Cleaners
Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited
Intersecting Interests
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |