Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Descriptive Representation, Judicial Nominations, and Perceptions of Presidential Accomplishment

Bibliographic Data

ID6378826
AuthorsAlex Badas (0000-0002-6379-0375, University of Houston), Katelyn E Stauffer (0000-0001-7285-0440, University of South Carolina)
Year2023
Volume59
Issue2
Pages249-270
Publication date2023-04-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueRepresentation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0034-4893 • E-ISSN: 1749-4001
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00344893.2022.2037699
OpenAlexW4213439739
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited56

Some narratives claim that American presidents can increase their approval ratings by nominating members of underrepresented groups to positions within the judiciary. Indeed, public opinion polls frequently show that members of the public think presidents should consider individuals from underrepresented groups when making judicial appointments. Despite the prevalence of these narratives, little research investigates how the descriptive characteristics of judicial appointments influence public evaluations of the president. We find that the public views presidents more favourably when they are more inclusive of women and minorities in their judicial appointments, and this effect is particularly strong for Democrats. The results demonstrate that presidents can increase public support by appointing individuals from underrepresented groups. This research has implications for representation and judicial selection in the United States

Judicial opinion · Narrative · Perception · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Public opinion · Public relations · Representation (politics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Psychology · Public Administration

  • Lifetime Appointments, Lasting Reactions

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • The Prevalence and Consequences of Women’s Algorithmic Underrepresentation in Cross-National Political Google Searches

    Open Access•Tobias Rohrbach, Mykola Makhortykh et al.•Political Communication•2026

  • Gender and Ambition Among Potential Law Clerks

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • Legislative diversity and the rise of women judicial nominees in the United States

    Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • Democratizing U.S. Courts

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, John M Bruce•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • Mass Versus Donor Attitudes on the Importance of Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Women Robed in Independence

    Open Access•Emilee Smart, Andrea G Dooley Wood et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2025

  • Descriptive Representation in an Era of Polarization

    Anna Weissman•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Because He Is Gay

    Ana Bracic, Mackenzie Israel-Trummel et al.•The Journal of Politics•2023

  • You Reached Out to Me to Help

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Jessica A Schoenherr et al.•Politics & Gender•2025

  • Anchoring or Expanding? Gender and Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Jonathan M King, Jessica A Schoenherr et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Motivated Reasoning and Attitudes Towards Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Millionaire Justices and Attitudes Towards the Supreme Court

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Billy Justus•Political Behavior•2024

  • The Influence of Descriptive Representation on Support for Judicial Nominees and the US Supreme Court

    Open Access•Miles T Armaly, Christopher Krewson et al.•Political Behavior•2025

  • Promoting a Diverse Bench

    Open Access•Jaclyn Kaslovsky, Albert H Rivero et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Can't We All Just Get Along? How Women MPs Can Ameliorate Affective Polarization in Western Publics

    Open Access•James Adams, David Bracken et al.•American Political Science Review•2023

  • Who gets in? a conjoint analysis of labour market demand and immigration preferences in England and Japan

    Open Access•Riku Kawakami, Thomas J Scotto et al.•New Community•2025

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Rule by Law

    Tom Ginsburg, Tamir Moustafa•Rule by Law•2008

  • Political Power and Women’s Representation in Latin America

    Leslie A Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A Schwindt‐bayer•Political power and women's…•2010

  • Uncivil Agreement

    L Mason•Uncivil agreement•2018

  • Conjoint Survey Experiments

    Open Access•Kirk Bansak, Jens Hainmueller et al.•Advances in Experimental…•2021

  • Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, Dominik Hangartner et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2015

  • A retrospective on Obama’s judges

    Rorie Spill Solberg, Jennifer Segal Diascro•Politics Groups and Identities•2018

  • Are samples drawn from Mechanical Turk valid for research on political ideology

    Open Access•Clifford, Ryan Jewell et al.•Research & Politics•2015

  • Why “Go Public”? Presidential Use of Nominees to the U.S. Courts of Appeals

    Open Access•Lisa M Holmes, Lisa Holmes•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • The Promise of Experiments for Studying the Presidency

    Open Access•Jeffrey E Cohen•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • Assessing the President

    Richard A Brody•Assessing the President•1991

  • Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts

    Nancy Scherer, Brett Curry•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy

    Open Access•Michael B Mackuen, Michael Mackuen et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Voting Can Be Hard, Information Helps

    Open Access•Melody Crowder-Meyer, Shana Kushner Gadarian et al.•Urban Affairs Review•2020

  • "Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent "Yes

    Joanna Mansbridge, Jane Mansbridge•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • The Marginal and Time-Varying Effect of Public Approval on Presidential Success in Congress

    Jon R Bond, Richard Fleisher et al.•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Breaking the Judicial Glass Ceiling

    María C Escobar-Lemmon, Valerie J Hoekstra et al.•The Journal of Politics•2021

  • Integrity and Presidential Approval, 1980-2000

    Brian Newman•Public Opinion Quarterly•2003

  • Michelle Obama as a Political Symbol

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Politics & Gender•2019

  • More is Better

    Lonna Rae Atkeson, Nancy Carrillo•Politics & Gender•2007

  • Are You My Candidate? Gender, Undervoting, and Vote Choice in Same-Party Matchups

    Open Access•Katelyn E Stauffer, Colin A Fisk•Politics & Gender•2022

  • The Supreme Court as an electoral issue

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Elizabeth N Simas et al.•Political Science Research and…•2022

  • The shape of and solutions to the MTurk quality crisis

    Open Access•Ryan Kennedy, Clifford et al.•Political Science Research and…•2020

  • Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Presidential Success on the Substance of Legislation

    Open Access•A W Barrett, Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Someone like Me

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Political Research Quarterly•2018

  • How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations

    Open Access•Malcolm Sen, Maya Sen•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • Racial Salience and the Obama Vote

    Open Access•Brian F Schaffner, Bertram Schaffner•Political Psychology•2011

  • How Explicit Racial Prejudice Hurt Obama in the 2008 Election

    Open Access•Spencer Piston•Political Behavior•2010

  • Motivated Reasoning, Public Opinion, and Presidential Approval

    Open Access•Ellen M Key, Kathleen Donovan et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • The Symbolic Benefits of Descriptive and Substantive Representation

    Open Access•Mark Hayes, Matthew Hayes et al.•Political Behavior•2017

  • What Goes with Red and Blue? Mapping Partisan and Ideological Associations in the Minds of Voters

    Open Access•Stephen N Goggin, John Henderson et al.•Political Behavior•2020

  • White Voters and African American Candidates for Congress

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton•Political Behavior•2004

  • Using Eye-Tracking to Understand Decision-Making in Conjoint Experiments

    Open Access•Libby Jenke, Kirk Bansak et al.•Political Analysis•2021

  • Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, D J Hopkins et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • Does Conjoint Analysis Mitigate Social Desirability Bias

    Open Access•Yusaku Horiuchi, Zachary Markovich et al.•Political Analysis•2022

  • Ideological Republicans and Group Interest Democrats

    Open Access•Matt Grossmann, David A Hopkins•Perspectives on Politics•2015

  • Scoring Points

    Open Access•Jonathan Remy Nash•Perspectives on Politics•2006

  • Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes

    Michael S Lewis-Beck, Mary Stegmaier•Annual Review of Political Science•2000

  • Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts

    Open Access•Jonathan P Kastellec•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging

    Open Access•Christina L Boyd, Lee Epstein et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • All Male Panels? Representation and Democratic Legitimacy

    Open Access•Anthony Clayton, Amanda Clayton et al.•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Presidential Strategy in the Judicial Appointment Process

    Open Access•Lisa M Holmes, Lisa Holmes•American Politics Research•2007

  • Commander-in-chief or chief economist

    Open Access•Michael Nickelsburg, Helmut Norpoth•Electoral Studies•2000

  • What voters want from their parties

    Open Access•Annika Werner•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Voting for women in nonpartisan and partisan elections

    Open Access•Alex Badas, Katelyn E Stauffer•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections

    Open Access•James E Campbell, Joe A Sumners•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Public Perceptions of Women's Inclusion and Feelings of Political Efficacy

    Open Access•Katelyn E Stauffer•American Political Science Review•2021

  • Race, Sociopolitical Participation, and Black Empowerment

    Open Access•Lawrence D Bobo, Lawrence Bobo et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

Unique citing works17
Citations per year5,67
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae