Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Naturalistic and Transcendental Moments in Kant's Moral Philosophy

Bibliographic Data

ID8081745
AuthorsPaul Guyer (0000-0001-7195-6710, corresponding author)
Year2007
Volume50
Issue5
Pages444-464
Publication date2007-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInquiry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0020-174X • E-ISSN: 1502-3923
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00201740701612309
OpenAlexW2041698158
LanguageEN
Citations received15

During the 1760s and 1770s, Kant entertained a naturalistic approach to ethics based on the supposed psychological fact of a human love for freedom. During the critical period, especially in the Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals, Kant clearly rejected such an approach. But his attempt at a metaphysical foundation for ethics in section III of the Groundwork was equally clearly a failure. Kant recognized this in his appeal to the “fact of reason” argument in the Critique of Practical Reason, but thereby gave up on any attempt to ground the fundamental principle of morality at all. So it is of interest to see how far we might now proceed along the lines of his original naturalistic approach

Appeal · Argument (complex analysis · Epistemology · Foundation (evidence · Metaphysics · Morality · Naturalism · Political science · Practical reason · Teleology · Transcendental idealism · Transcendental number · Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · War, Ethics, and Justification · Law · Philosophy

  • The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870)

    Open Access•Allen W Wood, Songsuk Susan Hahn•Cambridge History of Philosophy…•2012

  • Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity

    Kate Moran, Kate A Moran•Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity•2018

  • From Justice to Fairness

    Michael Nance, Jeppe Von Platz•Kant on Freedom and Spontaneity•2018

  • Kant on the Moral Law as the Causal Law for Freedom

    David Forman•Kant-Studien•2022

  • Some hope for Kant’s Groundwork III

    Open Access•Jessica Saunders•Inquiry•2024

  • Kant, Eudaimonism, Act-Consequentialism and the Fact of Reason

    Martin Sticker•Archiv für Geschichte der…•2020

  • Schopenhauer, Kant and Compassion

    Open Access•Paul Guyer•Kantian Review•2012

  • God’s Awful Majesty Before Our Eyes

    Open Access•Tyler Paytas•Kantian Review•2017

  • Kant on Moral Freedom and Moral Slavery

    Open Access•David Forman•Kantian Review•2012

  • Sex, Love, and Gender

    Helga Varden•Sex, Love, and Gender•2020

  • How can Common Rational Capacities Confirm the Correctness of the Deduction in Groundwork III—and Why does it Matter

    Open Access•Martin Sticker•Hegel Bulletin•2014

  • The Moral Law as a Fact of Reason and Correctness Conditions for the Moral Law

    Open Access•Byeong D Lee•Dialogue•2018

  • Kant on Freedom and Rational Agency

    Markus Kohl•Kant on Freedom and Rational Agency•2023

  • Kant's Theory of Normativity

    Open Access•Konstantin Pollok•Kant's Theory of Normativity•2017

  • Kant's Conception of Freedom

    Open Access•Henry E Allison•Kant's Conception of Freedom•2020

Unique citing works15
Citations per year1,07
Citation span2012 - 2024 (13)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 15

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae