The interplay of geopolitics and historical lessons in foreign policy
Denmark facing German post-war rearmament
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8911549 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hans Mouritzen (Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), Strandgade 56, DK-1401 Copenhagen, Denmark, corresponding author), Mikkel Runge Olesen (0000-0003-1996-4494, DIIS, the Danish Institute for International Studies, and the Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 406-427 |
| Publication date | 2010-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cooperation and Conflict (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0010-8367 • E-ISSN: 1460-3691 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0010836710387028 |
| OpenAlex | W2043763391 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 18 |
Realist theory can no longer afford to neglect cases where policy-makers’ ‘lessons of the past’ play a role in foreign policy decisions. The case of Denmark confronting the prospect of German post-war rearmament should illustrate an interplay between the state’s geopolitical necessity — acquiescence in German NATO membership and rearmament due to Soviet military proximity — and policy-makers’ lessons from the recent German occupation of Denmark (that led to Danish inclinations to reject such membership). In other words, this is a case of strong and countervailing pressures. The article examines how the interplay unfolded, including the tactics politicians used to counterbalance and overrule any ‘inconvenient’ lessons. Whereas geopolitical pressures clearly dominated the ‘competition’, one historical lesson could be used as a negotiation asset to bluff foreign powers on the related Schleswig issue. The general thesis articulated in this article is that the state’s external freedom of action, as a gate-keeper, may allow or forbid lessons to play a role. Studying only situations characterized by wide freedom of action gives us a biased picture of foreign policy, implying that policy-makers are free to enact whatever peculiarities or constructions — in the case of this article, historical lessons — are available to them. However, such situations remain only special cases of foreign policy
Acquiescence · Foreign policy · Foreign policy analysis · Foreign relations · Geopolitics · German · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · State (computer science · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · European Union Policy and Governance · History · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law
Best Practices and Elite Belief
Altid beredt! Den danske ekspeditionsparathed i komparativt lys
To Balance or Not to Balance
Remember Iraq!’ Learning theory and the 2013 non-decision on air strikes against Syria
Varieties of neutrality
Was something rotten in the state of Denmark? Three narratives of the active internationalism in Danish foreign policy
We now know
Discord and Collaboration
Analogies at War
The Functions of Social Conflict
America's Germany
The Origins of Alliances
The Nordic–Baltic Area
The Politics of History and the “War of Monuments” in Estonia
On the Sources of Knowledge and of Ignorance
Democracy and foreign policy
Lessons of the Past
Geopolitics of the North
Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
Learning and foreign policy
Anarchy is what states make of it
Compatibility and Consensus
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,4 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2025 (15) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |