Magistrates and Juries in France, 1791-1952
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8940414 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James M Donovan (0000-0003-4336-0658, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1999 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 379-379 |
| Publication date | 1999-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | French Historical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0016-1071 • E-ISSN: 1527-5493 |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/286713 |
| OpenAlex | W2330310788 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
When the men of the Revolution introduced trial by jury in France in 1791, they saw it as an expression of the sovereignty of the people. It was based on the assumption that citizen-judges, guided by their common sense, were competent to administer justice. Yet by the middle of the twentieth century, the jury systemonce seen as essential to the protection of the people's liberty-had been nearly destroyed in France. Justice was now administered almost entirely by professional magistrates. It was, in fact, the magistrates themselves who were primarily responsible for this outcome. Their principal means of achieving it was a procedure known as correctionalization (i.e., transferring cases that would normally be tried by the cours d'assises, the trial courts for felonies and the only French tribunals to use juries, to the tribunaux correctionnels, the trial courts for misdemeanors, which used panels of judges only).' A number of jurists and historians have discussed how magistrates used this procedure to better assure convictions and free the judiciary from most of the limitations juries imposed on its power. Yet no one seems to have provided a systematic analysis of all the factors that contributed to the evolution of the conflict between magistrates and juries, a conflict which began in the Napoleonic period and did not end until the mid-twentieth century. For the character of the magistrates' attack on the juries was hardly static: though influenced to some extent by prerevolutionary French legal traditions, which had
Political science · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Medieval and Early Modern Justice · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies
Judicial Authority and Popular Justice
Le théâtre de la preuve
Public Opinion and the French Capital Punishment Debate of 1908
Recent Articles on French History
Morphine on Trial
De la discrétion dans la sélection des crimes. Approche sociologique des déterminants de la correctionnalisation
Witnessing for the Defense
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,27 |
| Citation span | 2000 - 2022 (23) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 7 |