Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Magistrates and Juries in France, 1791-1952

Bibliographic Data

ID8940414
AuthorsJames M Donovan (0000-0003-4336-0658, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume22
Issue3
Pages379-379
Publication date1999-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrench Historical Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0016-1071 • E-ISSN: 1527-5493
PublisherJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/286713
OpenAlexW2330310788
LanguageEN
Citations received7

When the men of the Revolution introduced trial by jury in France in 1791, they saw it as an expression of the sovereignty of the people. It was based on the assumption that citizen-judges, guided by their common sense, were competent to administer justice. Yet by the middle of the twentieth century, the jury systemonce seen as essential to the protection of the people's liberty-had been nearly destroyed in France. Justice was now administered almost entirely by professional magistrates. It was, in fact, the magistrates themselves who were primarily responsible for this outcome. Their principal means of achieving it was a procedure known as correctionalization (i.e., transferring cases that would normally be tried by the cours d'assises, the trial courts for felonies and the only French tribunals to use juries, to the tribunaux correctionnels, the trial courts for misdemeanors, which used panels of judges only).' A number of jurists and historians have discussed how magistrates used this procedure to better assure convictions and free the judiciary from most of the limitations juries imposed on its power. Yet no one seems to have provided a systematic analysis of all the factors that contributed to the evolution of the conflict between magistrates and juries, a conflict which began in the Napoleonic period and did not end until the mid-twentieth century. For the character of the magistrates' attack on the juries was hardly static: though influenced to some extent by prerevolutionary French legal traditions, which had

Political science · Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis · History · Medieval and Early Modern Justice · Vietnamese History and Culture Studies

  • Judicial Authority and Popular Justice

    E E Ferguson•Journal of Social History•2006

  • Le théâtre de la preuve

    Open Access•Frédéric Chauvaud•Revue d Histoire des Sciences…•2010

  • Public Opinion and the French Capital Punishment Debate of 1908

    Open Access•James M Donovan•Law and History Review•2014

  • Recent Articles on French History

    Jean‐pierre V M Herubel, Jean-Pierre V M Hérubel•French Historical Studies•2005

  • Morphine on Trial

    Sara Black, Sara Elizabeth Black•French Historical Studies•2019

  • De la discrétion dans la sélection des crimes. Approche sociologique des déterminants de la correctionnalisation

    Rémi Rouméas•Déviance et Société•2022

  • Witnessing for the Defense

    Open Access•Louise Mcreynolds•Slavic Review•2010

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,27
Citation span2000 - 2022 (23)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae