Significant Silences in Locke's Two Treatises of Government
Constitutional History, Contract and Law
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 8956122 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Martyn P Thompson (University of Tübingen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1988 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 275-294 |
| Publication date | 1988-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Historical Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0018-246X • E-ISSN: 1469-5103 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0018246x00012887 |
| OpenAlex | W2046896431 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 28 |
It is increasingly common in modern literary theory to read that a text's meaning must be elicited from the textual ‘possibilities which are not said ’. At this level of generality, the proposition applies equally to the interpretation of non-literary as literary texts. In this paper, I shall endeavour to illustrate the usefulness of this approach by considering the meaning of Locke's argument in Two treatises in terms of things which Locke chose not to say. I shall argue two points. First, I shall suggest that many of the controversies which have arisen in recent years about Locke's meaning have suffered because inadequate attention has been paid to the precise character of a number of silences in Locke's argument. The persistence of an inadequate framework for understanding the character of Englishmen's appeals to an original contract, constitutional law and history in the late seventeenth century will occupy my attention here. Second, I shall suggest that attention to the details of Locke's most significant silences can cast light on current controversies about the intellectual status of Locke's argument. In particular, I shall argue that the current tendency to locate Two treatises within a context of coded, conspiratorial politics is mistaken
Argument (complex analysis · Art · Character (mathematics · Context (archaeology · Epistemology · Generality · Interpretation (philosophy · Linguistics · Literature · Meaning (existential · Political science · Politics · Proposition · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence · Psychology · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Returning to Rawls
Mary Astell
James Tyrrell, John Locke, and Patriarcha non Monarcha (1681)
Our prince is king!’
Matthew Tindal's Rights of the Christian Church (1706) and the Church–state Relationship
The Ancient Constitution and the Languages of Political Thought
John Locke and Richard Ashcraft's Revolutionary Politics
Simple Objections and Complex Reality
Mary Astell (1666-1731), Critic of Locke
The Foundations of Modern Political Thought
The Political Thought of John Locke
Natural Rights Theories
Virtue, Commerce, and History
Monarchy and Revolution
The Goths in England
Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke, Peter Laslett
The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law
Reception and Influence
Revolutionary Politics and Locke's Two Treatises of Government
Patriarchalism in Political Thought
Abdicate’ and ‘Contract’ in the Glorious Revolution
James Tyrrell, Whig Historian and Friend of John Locke
Locke, Revolution Principles, and the Formation of Whig Ideology
The Glorious Revolution
Abdicate’ and ‘Contract’ Restored
John Locke on the Glorious Revolution
The Rulers now on Earth’
The Educational Writings of John Locke
A Note On "Reason" and "History" in Late Seventeenth Century Political Thought
Two treatises of government
John Locke and the Law of Nature
The Reception of Locke's Two Treatises of Government 1690–1705
Revolution Principles
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,25 |
| Citation span | 1990 - 2025 (36) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |